Abstract
Purpose
Since the introduction of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a variety of post-operative chest drainage systems have been utilized. Most surgeons use formal chest tubes with a Pleur-evac, while others use smaller bulb suction drains (e.g., Blake drain). In addition, some centers utilize pleural closure. This multicenter study evaluates whether drain type or pleural closure impact perioperative and 90 day complication rates.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted from three institutions with established VBT programs. All preoperative, perioperative and 90 day postoperative data were analyzed to determine differences in outcomes between three cohorts: standard chest tube (SCT), standard chest tube with pleural closure (SCTPC) and 10 French Bulb drain (BD).
Results
104 patients were identified for the study. 57 SCT, 25 SCTPC and 22 BD. All data are listed in order: SCT, SCTPC, BD. Length of stay (3.7, 4.3, 3.0 days) was less in the BD group (p = 0.009); post-operative drainage (460, 761, 485 cc) was less in the SCT and BD groups (p < 0.001); intra-operative estimated blood loss (EBL) 146, 382, 64 cc was less in the BD group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in number of days (3.2, 3.2, and 2.8 days) drainage was in place, groups (p = 0.311). Complication profile was similar with 2 chest tube reinsertions in the SCT and one hemothorax that resolved spontaneously in BD group.
Conclusions
In this series of 104 patients, SCT, SCTPC and BD all had a similar safety profile. All three methods were safe and effective in managing post-operative chest drainage after thoracic VBT. In the series, BD group had significantly shorter LOS than both groups that used chest tubes.
Level of evidence
Level III, Retrospective cohort study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parent S, Shen J (2020) Anterior vertebral body growth-modulation tethering in idiopathic scoliosis: surgical technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(17):693–699
Hoernschemeyer DG, Boeyer ME, Robertson ME et al (2020) Anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent scoliosis with growth remaining: a retrospective review of 2 to 5-year postoperative results. J Bone Jt Surg Am 102(13):1169–1176
Miyanji F, Pawelek J, Nasto LA et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Jt J 102-B(12):1703–1708
Beauchamp EC, Lenke LG, Cerpa M et al (2020) Selecting the “touched vertebra” as the lowest instrumented vertebra in patients with lenke type-1 and 2 curves: radiographic results after a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 102(22):1966–1973
Newton PO, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP et al (2020) Anterior spinal growth modulation in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison with posterior spinal fusion at 2 to 5 years postoperatively. J Bone Jt Surg Am 102(9):769–777
Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Ames RJ et al (2021) Prospective follow-up report on anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: interim results from an FDA IDE study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(17):1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01503 (PMID: 34185722)
Newton PO (2020) Spinal growth tethering: Indications and limits. Ann Transl Med 8(2):27
Haber LL, Adams TM, Briski DC et al (2020) Long-term results of spine stapling for AIS to skeletal maturity and beyond. J Pediatr Orthop 40(1):e37–e41
Bumpass DB, Fuhrhop SK, Schootman M et al (2015) Vertebral body stapling for moderate juvenile and early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: cautions and patient selection criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(24):E1305–E1314
Lavelle WF, Samdani AF, Cahill PJ et al (2011) Clinical outcomes of nitinol staples for preventing curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31(1 Suppl):S107–S113
Owen S, Gould D (1997) Underwater seal chest drains: the patient’s experience. J Clin Nurs 6:215–225
Fox V, Gould D, Davies N et al (1999) Patients’ experiences of having an underwater seal chest drain: a replication study. J Clin Nurs 8:684–692
Valusek PA, Tsao K, St Peter SD et al (2007) A comparison of chest tubes versus bulb-suction drains in pediatric thoracic surgery. J Pediatr Surg 42(5):812–814
Mathew S, Milbrandt TA, Potter DD et al (2021) Thoracic paravertebral nerve catheter reduces postoperative opioid use for vertebral body tethering patients. Spine Deform 9(6):1601–1607
Mathew S, Larson AN, Potter DD et al (2021) Defining the learning curve in CT-guided navigated thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering. Spine Deform 9(6):1581–1589
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the following members of the Harms Study Group: Mark Able MD, John Asghar MD, Keith Bachmann MD, Randy Betz MD, Aaorn Buckland MD, Patrick Cahill MD, David Clements MD, Mark Erickson MD, Nicholas Fletcher MD, Jack Flynn MD, Peter Gabos MD, Sumeet Garg MD, Stephen George MD, Michael Glotzbecker MD, Munish Gupta MD, Juergen Harms MD, Daniel Hedequist MD, Steven Hwang MD, Amit Jain MD, Michael Kelly MD, Hubert Labelle MD, Larry Lenke MD, Baron Lonner MD, Jean Mac-Thiong MD, Josh Pahys MD, Stefan Parent MD, Ben Roye MD, Suken Shah MD, Harry Shufflebarger MD, Paul Sponseller MD, Peter Sturm MD, Daniel Sucato MD, Salil Upasani MD, Michael Vitale MD, Burt Yaszay MD.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
LH: conception/data collection and interpretation, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. HS: conception/data collection and interpretation, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. NN: data collection/analysis, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. ANL: conception/data collection and analysis, revision, final approved, agreed. BD: data collection/analysis, writing, final approved, agreed. JR: data interpretation, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. WF: data collection/interpretation, writing, final approved, agreed. TM: conception, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. MB: data interpretation, writing and revision, final approved, agreed. MM: data interpretation, revision, final approved, agreed. PN: data interpretation, revision, final approved, agreed. AS: data interpretation, revision, final approved, agreed. FM: data interpretation, revision, final approved, agreed. DH: data interpretation, revision, final approved, agreed. Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work. Drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content. Approved the version to be published. Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Peter Newton MD: during the conduct of the study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the submitted work: grants and other from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation, other from Rady Children's Specialists, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from DePuy Synthes Spine, grants and other from SRS, grants from EOS imaging, personal fees from Thieme Publishing, grants from NuVasive, other from Electrocore, personal fees from Cubist, other from International Pediatric Orthopedic Think Tank, grants, non-financial support and other from Orthopediatrics, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Stryker/K2M, grants and non-financial support from Alphatech, grants from Mazor Robotics, personal fees from MiRus, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Pacira, from Scoliosis Research Society. In addition, Dr. Newton has a patent Anchoring systems and methods for correcting spinal deformities (8540754) with royalties paid to DePuy Synthes Spine, a patent Low profile spinal tethering systems (8123749) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent Screw placement guide (7981117) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., a patent Compressor for use in minimally invasive surgery (7189244) licensed to DePuy Spine, Inc., and a patent Posterior spinal fixation pending to K2M. Amer Samdani MD: during the conduct of the study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the submitted work: personal fees from DePuy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Ethicon, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Medical Device Business Services, personal fees from Mirus, personal fees from NuVasive, personal fees from Orthofix, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet. Firoz Miyanji MD: during the Conduct of the Study: grants from Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation. Outside the Submitted Work: personal fees from Deupy Synthes Spine, personal fees from Stryker Spine, personal fees from Zimmer Biomet. This study was supported in part by grants to the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation in support of Harms Study Group research from DePuy Synthes Spine, EOS imaging, Stryker Spine, Medtronic, NuVasive, Zimmer Biomet and the Food and Drug Administration.
Ethical approval
This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of the Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Mayo Clinic, and University of Missouri-Columbia approved this study.
Informed consent
No informed consent was needed as this was a retrospective chart review, and no identifying information was used.
Human and animal rights
This article was a retrospective chart review and, thus, did not infringe on rights of humans or animals.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Haber, L., Starring, H., Newcomb, N. et al. Drain options after vertebral body tethering. Spine Deform 11, 367–372 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00595-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00595-5