Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of the flexibility of the spinal deformity on low back pain and disc degeneration in adult patients nonoperatively treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracolumbar or lumbar curves

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of the flexibility of thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) curves on low back pain (LBP) and disc degeneration in adult patients nonoperatively treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Forty-seven adult patients (46 women; mean age, 40.5 years) nonoperatively treated for AIS with TL/L curves were included. The patients completed radiological examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, and a questionnaire survey for LBP evaluation. The flexibility of the spinal deformity was evaluated using supine side-bending radiographs. Radiographic measurements were correlated with scores for LBP and disc degeneration.

Results

The average magnitude and flexibility of the TL/L curve were 49.0° and 56%, respectively. The magnitudes of the TL/L curve and disc wedging were significantly correlated with LBP (|r|= 0.3–0.4). The flexibility of the TL/L curve and disc wedging, and the lumbar lateral range of motion (ROM) were significantly correlated with LBP and disc degeneration (|r|= 0.3–0.5). After controlling for the magnitudes of the TL/L curve and disc wedging, the flexibility of L4/5 disc wedging and the lumbar lateral ROM remained significantly correlated with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 pain score (partial correlation coefficient [r′] = 0.5 and 0.3), Oswestry Disability Index (− 0.3 and − 0.3), and disc degeneration (− 0.4 and 0.3).

Conclusion

In AIS patients with TL/L curves, the flexibility of L4/5 disc wedging and the lumbar lateral ROM were significantly correlated with LBP and disc degeneration, independent of the magnitudes of the coronal deformities. Our findings indicate that maintaining or improving lumbar flexibility may be beneficial for preventing or treating LBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Agabegi SS, Kazemi N, Sturm PF et al (2015) Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally mature patients: a critical review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:714–723. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein SL (2019) The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 39:S44–S46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan P, Skaggs DL, Sanders AE et al (2017) Pain is the greatest preoperative concern for patients and parents before posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E1245–E1250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Hirano T et al (2020) Health-related quality of life in nonoperated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the middle years: a mean 25-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:E83–E89. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O et al (2019) Adult spinal deformity. Lancet 394:160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31125-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG et al (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 369:1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohashi M, Watanabe K, Hirano T et al (2020) Flexibility of the thoracic curve and three-dimensional thoracic kyphosis can predict pulmonary function in nonoperatively treated adult patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Sci 25:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohashi M, Watanabe K, Hirano T et al (2018) Predicting factors at skeletal maturity for curve progression and low back pain in adult patients treated nonoperatively for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracolumbar/lumbar curves: a mean 25-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E1403–E1411. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohashi M, Watanabe K, Hirano T et al (2019) The natural course of compensatory lumbar curves in nonoperated patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:E89–E98. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K et al (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:682–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M et al (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202150-00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR et al (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2024–2029. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D (1989) Coronal and sagittal plane spinal deformities correlating with back pain and pulmonary function in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198912000-00018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S et al (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J 25:3675–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K et al (2018) Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J 27:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P (1999) Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2497–2505. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199912010-00012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Nieuwenhuyse A, Crombez G, Burdorf A et al (2009) Physical characteristics of the back are not predictive of low back pain in healthy workers: a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohashi M, Bastrom TP, Marks MC et al (2020) The benefits of sparing lumbar motion segments in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are evident at 10 years postoperatively. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:755–763. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F et al (2002) Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2346–2349. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211010-00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Japan Orthopaedics and Traumatology Research Foundation Inc. (No. J16G0016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MO, KW, TH, KH, KK, HT, and YS: conception and design of the work; MO, KW, TH, KH, KK, HT, and YS: acquisition and analysis of data; HK: conceptual advice and supervision; MO, KW, TH, and KH: interpretation of data; MO, KW, TH, KH, KK, HT, YS, and HK: drafted the work; MO, KW, TH, KH, KK, HT, YS, and HK: substantively revised the work; MO, KW, TH, KH, KK, HT, YS, and HK: approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Ohashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The submitted manuscript does not contain any information about medical device(s)/drug(s). No relevant financial activities exist outside the submitted work.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences.

Consent to participate and for publication

The written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohashi, M., Watanabe, K., Hirano, T. et al. Impact of the flexibility of the spinal deformity on low back pain and disc degeneration in adult patients nonoperatively treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracolumbar or lumbar curves. Spine Deform 10, 133–140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00402-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00402-7

Keywords

Navigation