Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients can have body dissatisfaction which can affect their perception of health. Two body image measures, the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis (BIDQ-S), have been used in pediatric IS with variable correlation to the SRS-22r and radiographs, but have not been compared to each other. As patient reported outcomes (PROs) continue to be highlighted in large database studies and national hospital ranking system scoring, we should narrow use to the best and most efficient. We aim to determine which of two better correlates to pediatric IS patients’ radiographs and quality of life (QoL) scores.
Consecutive IS patients aged 10–19 years old without surgery prospectively completed BIDQ-S, SAQ, SRS-22r, and PedsQL self-reported outcome measures. BIDQ-S and SAQ were compared in correlation to the two QoL surveys, as well as to radiographic major curve, shoulder asymmetry, lateral upright ribcage offset at apex, and coronal/sagittal balance. Spearman’s r was used for correlations.
104 surveys with mean age 14.4 years and mean major curve 42° (14°–74°) were included. BIDQ-S and SAQ scores strongly correlated to each other (r = 0.76), but BIDQ-S had a stronger correlation to total SRS-22r (− 0.75 vs − 0.61 SAQ), PedsQL total (− 0.76 vs − 0.55) and better or no difference in each SRS-22r and PedsQL domain. Both poorly correlated to radiographs (main curve: r = 0.32 BIDQ-S, 0.31 SAQ).
The BIDQ-S correlates better to SRS-22r and PedsQL for pediatric IS patients than the SAQ. Neither correlate well to radiographs.
Level of evidence
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Clayson D, Luz-Alterman S, Cataletto MM et al (1987) Long-term psychological sequelae of surgically versus nonsurgically treated scoliosis. Spine 12:983–986
Payne WK, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD et al (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 22:1380–1384
Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC et al (1997) Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):712–717
Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K et al (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after a brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10:278–288
Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B et al (1994) The Ste-Justine Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Cohort Study. Part II: perception of health, self and body image, and participation in physical activities. Spine 19(14):1562–1572
Danielsson AJ (2007) What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life? Spine 32(19 Suppl):S101–S108
D’Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG et al (2000) Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 25(14):1795–1802
Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B et al (1994) Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine 19:1562–1572
Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D et al (2006) Parents’ and patients’ perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(20):2367–2374
Lonner BS, Brochin R, Lewis R et al (2019) Body image disturbance improvement after operative correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 7(5):741–745
Cheshire J, Gardner A, Berryman F et al (2017) Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:37 (eCollection 2017)
Brewer P, Berryman F, Baker D, Pynsent P, Gardner A (2013) Influence of Cobb angle and ISIS2 surface topography volumetric asymmetry on Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcome scores in scoliosis. Spine Deform 1(6):452–457
Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W et al (2003) Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 28:2158–2163
Pineda S, Bago J, Climent JM (2006) Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 1:18
Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR et al (2007) The spinal appearance questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 32(24):2719–2722
Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Polly DW et al (2011) Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing. Spine 36(18):E1240–E1244
Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Crerand CE et al (2014) Body image in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis Version. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(8):e61
Cash TF, Phillips KA, Santos MT et al (2004) Measuring “negative body image”: validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire in a nonclinical population. Body Image 1(4):363–372
Wetterkamp M, Thielsch MT, Gosheger G et al (2016) German validation of the BIDQ-S questionnaire on body image disturbance in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 26(2):309–315
Bao H, Yan P, Lonner B et al (2015) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis. Spine 40(21):E1155–E1160
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2008) Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126(5):1763–8
Faul R, Erdfelder E, Buchner A et al (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160
Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M et al (2013) Discriminative properties of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire compared with the Spinal Research Society-22 Revised. Spine Deform 1(5):328–338
Matamalas A, Bago J, D’Agata E, Pellise F (2014) Body image in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of psychometric properties between four patient-reported outcome instruments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-81
Thielsch MT, Wetterkamp M, Boertz P et al (2018) Reliability and validity of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS). J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):274
Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J (1978) Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60(2):173–176
Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM et al (1999) Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-center study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440
Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2000) Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument. Spine 25:2381–2386
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:63–69
Glattes RC, Burton DC, Lai SM et al (2007) The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity. Spine 32(16):1778–1784
Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D et al (2004) The influence of spine and trunk deformity on preoperative idiopathic scoliosis patients’ health-related quality of life questionnaire responses. Spine 29(8):861–868
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28(1):74–78
Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D et al (2003) Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 28(1):70–73
Verma K, Lonner B, Hoashi JS et al (2010) Demographic factors affect Scoliosis Research Society-22 performance in healthy adolescents: a comparative baseline for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 35(24):2134–2139
Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW (2006) A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine 31:3027–3038
Birdwell K, Shufflebarger H, Lenke L et al (2000) Parents’ and patients’ preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Spine 25:2392–2399
Parent EC, Wong D, Hill D et al (2010) The association between Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores and scoliosis severity changes at a clinically relevant threshold. Spine 35(3):315–322
Bagó J, Pérez-Grueso FJ, Les E et al (2009) Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18(12):1898–1904
Koch KD, Buchanan R, Birch JG et al (2001) Adolescents undergoing surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: how physical and psychological characteristics relate to patient satisfaction with the cosmetic result. Spine 26:2119–2124
Qiu X, Ma W, Li W et al (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine J 18(1):45–51
Toombs C, Lonner B, Shah S et al (2018) Quality of life improvement following surgery in adolescent spinal deformity patients: a comparison between Scheuermann Kyphosis and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform 6(6):676–683
Mulcahey MJ, Chafetz RS, Santangelo AM et al (2011) Cognitive testing of the spinal appearance questionnaire with typically developing youth and youth with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31(6):661–667
Bago J, Sanchez-Raya J, Perez-Grueso FJS et al (2010) The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 5(1):6
Bago J, Matamalas A, Sanchez-Raya J et al (2018) Responsiveness of image perception outcome scales after surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between the trunk appearance perception scale (TAPS) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine Deform 6(4):417–423
We would like to acknowledge Susan Lenander for her special assistance in PRO completion.
No funding was received for this work.
This study is covered under approved IRB permission; exemption for consent.
Conflict of interest
None pertinent to this study; see declaration form.
Available without HPI.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bauer, J.M. The body image disturbance questionnaire-scoliosis better correlates to quality of life measurements than the spinal assessment questionnaire in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00358-8
- Body image
- Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
- Pediatric scoliosis
- Scoliosis PRO