Skip to main content
Log in

Single-level fusion without decompression for high-grade spondylolithesis in adolescents: a novel surgical strategy

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to assess the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a novel surgical approach to HGS consisting of a single-level anterior reduction, placement of a lordotic cage, and circumferential fixation without decompression.

Methods

This was a retrospective consecutive case series of 11 adolescents who underwent anterior reduction through placement of a lordotic cage followed by posterior fusion using pedicle screws and rods confined to L5–S1. Radiographic data included slip percentage, slip angle, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic sagittal parameters assessed at clinical visits preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. A telephone survey was conducted to obtain current information about function, activity level, work status, and retrograde ejaculation.

Results

Patients were followed for an average of 7.8 years (range 2–16). Mean age was 15.5 years (range 12–19). The mean percent slip corrected from 55 to 18%. The average slip angle was + 17.1° preoperatively and − 14.1° at final assessment (average correction of 20.7°). Thirty-six percent (4/11) of patients improved by three Meyerding grades and an additional 55% (6/11) improved by two grades. Complications included one instance each of superficial infection, wound dehiscence, and transient neuralgia. There were no cases of instrumentation failure, cage subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, or retrograde ejaculation. Radiographic evidence of fusion was observed in all cases.

Conclusion

Single-level anterior reduction and circumferential fusion without decompression appears to be a safe and effective alternative for the surgical treatment of pediatric HGS.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The original/raw data for main outcomes presented in the paper can be found in Table 2.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA (2007) Evidence-based medicine analysis of isthmic spondylolisthesis treatment including reduction versus fusion in situ for high-grade slips. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19 Suppl):S126–S129. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145b353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ploumis A, Hantzidis P, Dimitriou C (2005) High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis and spondyloptosis: report of three cases with surgical treatment and review of the literature. ActaOrthopBelg 71(6):750–757

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wiltse LL, Jackson DW (1976) Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children. ClinOrthopRelat Res 117:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  4. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Ungacta FF, Riew KD (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(16):1701–1711. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908150-00012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH (2003) Evaluation and surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Instr Course Lect 52:525–532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burkus JK, Dryer RF, Peloza JH (2013) Retrograde ejaculation following single-level anterior lumbar surgery with or without recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in 5 randomized controlled trials: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 18(2):112–121. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.spine11908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreau S, Lonjon G, Guigui P, Lenoir T, Garreau de Loubresse C, Chopin D (2016) Reduction and fusion in high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis by a single posterior approach. Results in 50 patients. OrthopTraumatolSurg Res 102(2):233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.12.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeWald CJ, Vartabedian JE, Rodts MF, Hammerberg KW (2005) Evaluation and management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S49-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155573.34179.7e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harms J, Jeszensky D (1997) True spondylolisthesis reduction and monosegmental fusion in spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, pp 1337–1347

    Google Scholar 

  10. Passias PG, Poorman CE, Yang S, Boniello AJ, Jalai CM, Worley N, Lafage V (2015) Surgical treatment strategies for high-grade spondylolisthesis: A systematic review. Int J Spine Surg 9:50. https://doi.org/10.14444/2050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruf M, Koch H, Melcher RP, Harms J (2006) Anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion in high-grade developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):269–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197204.91891.eb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ (2005) High-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: monosegmental surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(6 Suppl):S42-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155583.55856.f9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maurice HD, Morley TR (1989) Caudaequina lesions following fusion in situ and decompressive laminectomy for severe spondylolisthesis Four case reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(2):214–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198902000-00012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MG (1996) An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(10):1133–1138. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199605150-00002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoenecker PL, Cole HO, Herring JA, Capelli AM, Bradford DS (1990) Caudaequina syndrome after in situ arthrodesis for severe spondylolisthesis at the lumbosacral junction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(3):369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill GG, Manning JG, White HL (1955) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion; excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37(3-a):493–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hresko MT, Hirschfeld R, Buerk AA, Zurakowski D (2009) The effect of reduction and instrumentation of spondylolisthesis on spinopelvic sagittal alignment. J PediatrOrthop 29(2):157–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181977de8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nahle IS, Labelle H, Parent S, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong JM (2019) The impact of surgical reduction of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis on proximal femoral angle and quality of life. Spine J Official J North Am Spine Soc 19(4):670–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanfilippo JA Jr, Lee JY, Rihn J, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS (2007) BMP-2 causes increased postoperative radiculitis following TLIF. J Official North Am Spine Soc 7(5):5S-6S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tannoury CA, An HS (2014) Complications with the use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in spine surgery. J Official North Am Spine Soc 14(3):552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Comer GC, Smith MW, Hurwitz EL, Mitsunaga KA, Kessler R, Carragee EJ (2012) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with and without bone morphogenetic protein-2 augmentation: a 10-year cohort controlled study. J Official North Am Spine Soc 12(10):881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindley EM, McBeth ZL, Henry SE, Cooley R, Burger EL, Cain CM, Patel VV (2012) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(20):1785–1789. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825752bc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec JC (2003) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(10):1023–1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000062965.47779.eb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gumbs AA, Shah RV, Yue JJ, Sumpio B (2005) The open anterior paramedian retroperitoneal approach for spine procedures. Arch Surg 140(4):339–343. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.4.339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bateman DK, Millhouse PW, Shahi N, Kadam AB, Maltenfort MG, Koerner JD, Vaccaro AR (2015) Anterior lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated complications. J Official North Am Spine Soc 15(5):1118–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Amy Bronstone, PhD, for assistance with editing the manuscript, Jarrod Brown and Austin Wheeler for assistance with data collection, and Darlene Guillot for creating the medical illustrations.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A, H, K: Made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work. A, H, K: Drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content. A, H, K: Approved the version to be published. A, H, K: Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew G. S. King.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. King reports having received payment from by Medicrea to attend a meeting outside the scope of this work. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Louisiana Health Sciences Center (FWA 00002762).

Informed consent

In view of the retrospective nature of the study, the fact that all the procedures and measures being performed were part of routine care, and that data were de-identified, the IRB did not require informed consent.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that the human research participant provided signed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 2,  3.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alijanipour, P., Heffernan, M.J. & King, A.G.S. Single-level fusion without decompression for high-grade spondylolithesis in adolescents: a novel surgical strategy. Spine Deform 9, 1457–1464 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00352-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00352-0

Keywords

Navigation