Skip to main content

Accuracy of freehand pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the subaxial cervical spine

Abstract

Study design

Radiographic comparative study with prospectively collected data.

Objectives

To assess the accuracy of subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with freehand technique compared to lateral mass screws (LMS).

Summary of background data

The freehand cervical pedicle screw insertion technique guided by intraoperative lateral C-arm imaging has been shown to be both safe and effective. However, no study has performed a 100% audit of this technique using pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) to determine its true accuracy, as well as its reduction capability of CPS and LMS instrumentation.

Methods

36 consecutive patients treated surgically by a single surgeon with the exclusive practice of LMS and subsequently CPS over 2 years were included. CT and EOS slot scanner were performed pre- and post-operatively to determine the extent of pedicle screw breach and to assess sagittal alignment reduction between CPS and LMS groups. Predictors of pedicle screw breaches were also identified using multivariate analysis.

Results

CPS fixation was more effective in restoring global cervical angle and had superior reduction capability of cervical lordosis at the levels of C3/4 (5.00 ± 3.92, p = 0.008), C4/5 (6.63 ± 5.5, p = 0.010) and C5/6 (7.22 ± 6.19, p = 0.004) compared to LMS fixation. Pedicle screw breaches occurred most commonly at C4 (p = 0.003), and most commonly involved the lateral pedicle wall (p < 0.001). Placement of freehand pedicles screws on the concavity of rotated vertebrae was predictive of pedicle screw breach (OR 2.567, 95% CI 1.058–6.228, p = 0.037). There was no significant difference in the complication rate.

Conclusions

Although freehand cervical pedicle screw fixation is technically more demanding, it is generally safe and effective. However, the increased risk of screw breaches in the context of a rotated spine should be taken into consideration. Lateral mass screw fixation is advised if spinal realignment is not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abumi K, Ito M, Sudo H (2012) Reconstruction of the subaxial cervical spine using pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 37(5):E349–E356. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239cf1f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Xie J, Yang Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Li T, Liu L (2013) Computed tomography assessment of lateral pedicle wall perforation by free-hand subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(7):901–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1752-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joaquim AF, Mudo ML, Tan LA, Riew KD (2018) Posterior subaxial cervical spine screw fixation: a review of techniques. Glob Spine J 8(7):751–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218759940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perna F, Borghi R, Pilla F, Stefanini N, Mazzotti A, Chehrassan M (2016) Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 100(3):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0438-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Nakashima H, Machino M (2009) Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope. Eur Spine J 18(9):1293–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1032-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Mwaka ES, Kobayashi S, Baba H (2009) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 11(5):521–528. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.Spine08385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Law MD Jr, Bernhardt M, White AA 3rd (1993) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of surgical indications and decision making. Yale J Biol Med 66(3):165–177

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Saito J, Maki S, Kamiya K, Furuya T, Inada T, Ota M, Iijima Y, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Aramomi M, Mannoji C, Koda M (2016) Outcome of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion surgery for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci 32:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abumi KMD, Kaneda KMD (1997) Pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine 22(16):1853–1863

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hey HWD, Tan KA, Ho VC, Azhar SB, Lim JL, Liu GK, Wong HK (2018) Radiologically defining horizontal gaze using EOS imaging-a prospective study of healthy subjects and a retrospective audit. Spine J 18(6):954–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, Weber MH (2015) Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 24(5):990–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3853-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bredow J, Beyer F, Oppermann J, Kraus B, Meyer C, Stein G, Eysel P, Koy T (2016) A novel classification of screw placement accuracy in the cervical spine. Technol Health Care 24(6):919–925. https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-161246

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam GC, Hill DL, Le LH, Raso JV, Lou EH (2008) Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods. Scoliosis 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Min WK, Na SB, Jang JA (2018) Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using freehand technique and triggered EMG in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it different between concave and convex side? J Orthop Surg 26(2):2309499018784975. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018784975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boon Tow BP, Yue WM, Srivastava A, Lai JM, Guo CM, Wearn Peng BC, Chen JL, Yew AK, Seng C, Tan SB (2015) Does navigation improve accuracy of placement of pedicle screws in single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis?: a comparison between free-hand and three-dimensional O-arm navigation techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(8):E472–E477. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a9435e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo J, Wu C, Huang Z, Pan Z, Li Z, Zhong J, Chen Y, Han Z, Cao K (2017) The accuracy of the lateral vertebral notch-referred pedicle screw insertion technique in subaxial cervical spine: a human cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(4):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2647-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duff J, Hussain MM, Klocke N, Harris JA, Yandamuri SS, Bobinski L, Daniel RT, Bucklen BS (2018) Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study. Clin Biomech 53:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M, Ito K (2006) Cervical pedicle screw fixation in 100 cases of unstable cervical injuries: pedicle axis views obtained using fluoroscopy. J Neurosurg Spine 5(6):488–493. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Westermann L, Spemes C, Eysel P, Simons M, Scheyerer MJ, Siewe J, Baschera D (2018) Computer tomography-based morphometric analysis of the cervical spine pedicles C3–C7. Acta Neurochir 160(4):863–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3481-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chanplakorn P, Kraiwattanapong C, Aroonjarattham K, Leelapattana P, Keorochana G, Jaovisidha S, Wajanavisit W (2014) Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical spine using multi-detector computerized tomography (MD-CT) scan: the consideration for cervical pedicle screws fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim MK, Cho HJ, Kwak DS, You SH (2018) Characteristics of regional bone quality in cervical vertebrae considering BMD: determining a safe trajectory for cervical pedicle screw fixation. J Orthop Res 36(1):217–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pijpker PAJ, Kraeima J, Witjes MJH, Oterdoom DLM, Coppes MH, Groen RJM, Kuijlen JMA (2019) Accuracy assessment of pedicle and lateral mass screw insertion assisted by customized 3D-printed drill guides: a human cadaver study. Oper Neurosurg 16(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chachan S, Bin Abd Razak HR, Loo WL, Allen JC, Shree Kumar D (2018) Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is more reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation. Eur Spine J 27(11):2729–2736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5585-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A (2010) Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 19(3):370–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HWDH: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, revising critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published; W-HZ: acquisition of data for the work, Analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, drafting the work, final approval of the version to be published; YHJT: acquisition of data for the work, revising critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published; JHT: analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, revising critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwee Weng Dennis Hey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Wen-Hai Zhuo: joint first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hey, H.W.D., Zhuo, WH., Tan, Y.H.J. et al. Accuracy of freehand pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine Deform 8, 1049–1058 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00119-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00119-z

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Deformity correction
  • Freehand technique
  • Lateral mass screws
  • Pedicle screws