Abstract
Selection of the most optimal method of mining in the stage of designing the mine is considered to be an important and sensitive issue as far as designing the system of exploitation of a mine is concerned. This selection is based on geological, geotechnical, geographical, economic, social and political studies, etc. recognizing all of the factors that impact the method selection and determining the size of effect of each of these factors is not easily possible. The purpose of selecting the optimum extraction method in the first stage of designing a mine is to select a method that is as compatible as possible with the storage conditions and external factors such as economy, the budget that has been assigned to this project, and political, social and local conditions. In this respect, the researcher developed numerical and analytical methods for selecting a method for the extraction of mineral resources. Numerical methods are based on scoring parameters that are indicative of the condition of mineral resources. On the other hand, the analytical methods have utilized the decision-making methods in management sciences. The parameters that affected the decision making associated with the extraction method were not precise and they can be put in fuzzy sets. In this article, the shortcomings and defects of old quantitative numerical methods, such as UBS and Nicholas method, have been reviewed and using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, which are multi-criteria analytical methods, the best method of extraction of copper from Qaleh Zari copper mine was selected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, L., & Thompson, S. D. (1992). Mining method classification systems, SME Mining Engineering Hand-Book (pp. 531–537). Society for Mining Engineering, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc.
Afradi, A., Alavi, I., & Moslemi, M. (2020). Selecting the most suitable method for extracting construction materials in Iran through the fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making model. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (india): Series D. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-020-00239-w
Alavi, I., & Alinejad, R. H. (2011a). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for plant species selection (case study: Reclamation plan of Sungun Copper Mine; Iran). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1104–1113.
Alavi, I., Alinejad, R. H., & Sadegh Zadeh, M. (2011b). Prioritizing crescive plant species in Choghart Iron Mine Desert Region (used method: Fuzzy AHP). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1075–1078.
Alpay, S., & Yavuz, M. (2009). Underground mining method selection by decision making tools. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(2), 173–184.
Balusa, B. C., & Singam, J. (2017). Underground mining method selection using WPM and PROMETHEE. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (india) Series D, 99, 1–7.
Bitarafan, M. R., & Ataei, M. (2004). Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 104(9), 493–498.
Boshkov, S. H., & Wright, F. D. (1973). Basic and parametric criteria in the selection, design and development of underground mining systems. In A. B. Cummins & I. A. Given (Eds.), SME mining engineering handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 12.2-12.13). New York: SME-AIME.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and System, 17(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
Chu, M.-T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G.-H., & Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities’ group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.026
Chu, T. C. (2002). Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20, 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200227
Hartman, H. L. (1987). Introductory mining engineering. Wiley.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer.
Kabassi, K., & Virvou, M. (2004). A technique for preference ordering for advice generation in an intelligent help system. In Proceeding of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on System. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400857.
Kacprzyk, J. (1986). Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and System, 18(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(86)90014-X
Karadogan, A., Bascetin, A., Kahriman, A., & Gorgun, S. (2001). A new approach in selection of underground mining method. In Int. Conf. Modern Management Mine Producing Geol. Env. Protection, Varna, Bulgaria, June 3–9, 2001. pp. 171–184.
Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1985). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Khalou Kakayi, R., Atayi, M., Javanshir, M., & Jahanshahi, H. (2006). Mining method selection for Ghale-Zari copper deposit in Birjand with the use of analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management (IJIE), 17(3), 37–45.
Laubscher, D. H. (1981). Selection of mass underground mining methods. In D. Stewart (Ed.), Design and operation of caving and sublevel stoping mines (pp. 23–38). SME-AIME.
Miller, D. (2003). Indigenous copper mining and smelting in pre-colonial southern Africa. In Craddock, P. & Lang, J. (Eds.) Mining and metal production through the ages. London: British Museum, pp 101–110
Miller, T. L., Pakalnis, R., & Poulin, R. (1995). UBC mining method selection. University of British Columbia.
Mohammadian, M. (2017). Modelling, control and prediction using hierarchical fuzzy logic systems: Design and development. The International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), 6(3), 105–123.
Morrison, R. G. K. (1976). A philosophy of ground control (pp. 125–159). McGill University.
Nicholas, D. E. (1981). Method selection—A numerical approach. In D. Stewart (Ed.), Design and operation of caving and sublevel stoping mines, Chap. 4 (pp. 39–53). SME-AIME.
Nicholas, D. E. (1992). Selection method. In H. L. Hartman (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook (2nd ed., pp. 2090–2106). Society for Mining Engineering, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc.
Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS Publications.
Wang, W., Liu, X., Ma, Y., et al. (2021). A new approach for occupational risk evaluation of natural gas pipeline construction with extended cumulative prospect theory. The International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01038-x
Yang, F., Mu, N., Liao, X., et al. (2021). EA-HUFIM: Optimization for fuzzy-based high-utility itemsets mining. The International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01003-8
Yazdi, M., Khan, F., Abbassi, R., & Rusli, R. (2020). Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making. Safety Science, 127, 104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104705
Yen, J., & Langari, R. (1999). Fuzzy logic: Intelligence, control, and information. (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965a). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zhang, H. J., Zhou, Y., & Gan, Q. H. (2019). An extended PROMETHEE-II-based risk prioritization method for equipment failures in the geothermal power plant. The International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), 21(8), 2490–2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00679-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Mauro Cesar Geraldes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afradi, A., Alavi, I. & Moslemi, M. Selecting the best mining method using analytical and numerical methods. J. Sediment. Environ. 6, 403–415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43217-021-00063-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43217-021-00063-6