Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostik und Management bei chronischer Instabilität des hinteren Kreuzbandes

Diagnosis and management of chronic posterior cruciate ligament instability

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Knie Journal Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Chronische Instabilitäten des hinteren Kreuzbandes (HKB) nach verzögerter Diagnostik oder insuffizienter Ausheilung einer hinteren Kreuzbandruptur stellen eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Kenntnisse der typischen Verletzungsmechanismen, anatomischen Verhältnisse sowie gezielte klinische und bildgebende Untersuchungen helfen, diese Instabilitäten zu erkennen und zu objektivieren. Die posteriore Tibiatranslation in seitenvergleichenden Röntgenstressaufnahmen ist eine hilfreiche Entscheidungsgrundlage der Therapie. Das Fundament der operativen Therapie chronischer hinterer Instabilitäten stellt die hintere Kreuzbandersatzplastik dar. Die standardisierte arthroskopische anatomische Rekonstruktion wird in diesem Artikel skizziert.

Abstract

Chronic posterior instabilities after delayed diagnosis or insufficient healing of a posterior cruciate ligament rupture are challenging. Knowledge of the typical injury mechanisms, the detailed anatomy as well as targeted clinical examinations and imaging modalities help to identify these instabilities. Determination of increased posterior tibial translation on stress x‑rays can objectify instability and guide treatment. The surgical approach to chronic instability is ligament reconstruction. Standardized arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction is outlined in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Kennedy NI, Wijdicks CA, Goldsmith MT et al (2013) Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1: the individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med 41:2828–2838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM et al (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LaPrade RF, Floyd ER, Falaas KL et al (2021) The posterior cruciate ligament: anatomy, biomechanics, and double-bundle reconstruction. J Arthrosc Surg Sports Med 2:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winkler PW, Zsidai B, Wagala NN et al (2021) Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 1: anatomy, biomechanics and diagnostics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:672–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodriguez W Jr., Vinson EN, Helms CA et al (2008) MRI appearance of posterior cruciate ligament tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernhardson AS, DePhillipo NN, Daney BT et al (2019) Posterior tibial slope and risk of posterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 47:312–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhardson AS, Aman ZS, DePhillipo NN et al (2019) Tibial slope and its effect on graft force in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 47:1168–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gwinner C, Weiler A, Roider M et al (2017) Tibial slope strongly influences knee stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective 5‑ to 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 45:355–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung TM, Reinhardt C, Scheffler SU et al (2006) Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1116–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobsen K (1976) Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand 47:335–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Góralczyk A, Mostowy M, Ebisz M et al (2021) The PCL envelope lack sign (PELS) is a direct arthroscopic sign of chronic posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Appl Sci 11(8), 3608. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083608

  12. DGU) LdDGfUeV. S1 Leitlinie „Hintere Kreuzbandruptur“. AWMF Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. 2018.

  13. Schulz MS, Steenlage ES, Russe K et al (2007) Distribution of posterior tibial displacement in knees with posterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 89-A:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frosch K, Proksch N, Preiss A et al (2012) Treatment of bony avulsions of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) by a minimally invasive dorsal approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24:348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bedi A, Musahl V, Cowan JB (2016) Management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: an evidence-based review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:277–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winkler PW, Zsidai B, Wagala NN et al (2021) Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:682–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matava MJ, Sethi NS, Totty WG (2000) Proximity of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion to the popliteal artery as a function of the knee flexion angle: implications for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:796–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cosgarea AJ, Kramer DE, Bahk MS et al (2006) Proximity of the popliteal artery to the PCL during simulated knee arthroscopy: implications for establishing the posterior trans-septal portal. J Knee Surg 19:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johannsen AM, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA et al (2013) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 41:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Günther MHBA, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

D. Günther erhält oder erhielt Honoraria/Reisekosten von Arthrex, Stryker, Smith and Nephew, Storz, Geistlich, Medical Magnesium, Rimasys, Codon, Medi und Telos. A. Hundeshagen gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

Wolf Petersen, Berlin

Karl-Heinz Frosch, Hamburg

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hundeshagen, A., Günther, D. Diagnostik und Management bei chronischer Instabilität des hinteren Kreuzbandes. Knie J. 5, 219–225 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43205-023-00229-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43205-023-00229-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation