Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No prominent toxicity of polyethylene microplastics observed in neonatal mice following intratracheal instillation to dams during gestational and neonatal period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Toxicological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) have been recently recognized as a global environmental threat and its exposure as a risk factor to human health. Health effects through MPs exposure have been recently reported, especially through oral route of exposure. Since MPs could be exposed to humans through routes other than oral, this study was designed to evaluate whether MPs exposed through the inhalation route could be delivered to fetal mice and exhibit systemic toxicity. Polyethylene (PE) with 10–45 µm diameter were administered at 0 (distilled water, vehicle control), 6 (low administration), and 60 (high administration) µg/mouse/day to 3 pregnant dams per group from gestational day 9 to postnatal day (PND) 7 through intratracheal instillation. Dams and neonates were sacrificed at PND 7 and blood was collected. Various neonatal organs including brain, lung, heart, stomach, intestine, kidneys, and ovaries were collected for histopathological observation and weight measurement. No influence of PE-MPs administration was observed on the number of offsprings born, but the body and organs’ weight were heavier overall in the high administration group of dams and neonates than the other groups with statistical significance achieved in the heart and spleen weight. Level of serum acetylcholinesterase and glutathione peroxidase activity was decreased in the high administration group of dams and neonates compared with the other groups. Lung was the organ with highest number of PE-MPs present in the both administration groups of dams, and PE-MPs were also detected in liver and intestine of the high administration dams. Whereas, PND7 neonates showed accountable numbers of PE-MPs only in kidneys of the high administration group. Overall, the present study indicates that PE-MPs instilled intratracheally could be delivered to neonates from dams. Even though adverse effects from PE-MPs exposure during pregnant and lactational period are less prominent on both dam and neonate, potential of second-generation toxicity could be considered for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AWG, McGonigle D, Russell AE (2004) Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science 304:838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore CJ (2008) Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ Res 108:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrady AL (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abbasi S, Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Turner A, Kelly FJ, Dominguez AO, Jaafarzadeh N (2019) Distribution and potential health impacts of microplastics and microrubbers in air and street dusts from Asaluyeh County, Iran. Environ Pollut 244:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedà C, Caccamo L, Fossi MC, Gai F, Andaloro F, Genovese L, Perdichizzi A, Romeo T, Maricchiolo G (2016) Intestinal alterations in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758) exposed to microplastics: preliminary results. Environ Pollut 212:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cole M, Lindeque P, Fileman E, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2015) The impact of polystyrene microplastics on feeding, function and fecundity in the marine copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Environ Sci Technol 49:1130–1137. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504525u

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright SL, Kelly FJ (2017) Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environ Sci Technol 51:6634–6647. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Browne MA, Dissanayake A, Galloway TS, Lowe DM, Thompson RC (2008) Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environ Sci Technol 42:5026–5031. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800249a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu Y, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Jiang W, Zhao Y, Geng J, Ding L, Ren H (2016) Uptake and accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and toxic effects in liver. Environ Sci Technol 50:4054–4060. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. von Moos N, Burkhardt-Holm P, Köhler A (2012) Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. after an experimental exposure. Environ Sci Technol 46:11327–11335. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302332w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hans B, Hollman PCH, Peters RJB (2015) Potential health impact of environmentally released micro- and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology. Environ Sci Technol 49:8932–8947. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee K-W, Shim WJ, Kwon OY, Kang J-H (2013) Size-dependent effects of micro polystyrene particles in the marine copepod tigriopus japonicus. Environ Sci Technol 47:11278–11283. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401932b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nobre CR, Santana MFM, Maluf A, Cortez FS, Cesar A, Pereira CDS, Turra A (2015) Assessment of microplastic toxicity to embryonic development of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Mar Pollut Bull 92:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.12.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Lemos B, Ren H (2017) Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci Rep 7:46687. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Cauwenberghe L, Janssen CR (2014) Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption. Environ Pollut 193:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rochman CM, Tahir A, Williams SL, Baxa DV, Lam R, Miller JT, The FC, Werorilangi S, The SJ (2015) Anthropogenic debris in seafood: plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci Rep 5:14340. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang D, Shi H, Li L, Li J, Jabeen K, Kolandhasamy P (2015) Microplastic pollution in table salts from China. Environ Sci Technol 49:13622–13627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karami A, Golieskardi A, Choo CK, Larat V, Karbalaei S, Salamatinia B (2018) Microplastic and mesoplastic contamination in canned sardines and sprats. Sci Total Environ 612:1380–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason SA, Welch VG, Neratko J (2018) Synthetic polymer contamination in bottled water. Front Chem 6:407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M, Mirande C, Tassin B (2016) Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: a source of microplastics in the environment? Mar Pollut Bull 15:290–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Qiao R, Bonilla MM, Yang X, Ren H, Lemos B (2018) Evidence that microplastics aggravate the toxicity of organophosphorus flame retardants in mice (Mus musculus). J Hazard Mater 5:348–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu L, Luo T, Zhao Y, Cai C, Fu Z, Jin Y (2019) Interaction between microplastics and microorganism as well as gut microbiota: a consideration on environmental animal and human health. Sci Total Environ 667:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu L, Wan Z, Luo T, Zhengwei Fu, Jin Y (2018) Polystyrene microplastics induce gut microbiota dysbiosis and hepatic lipid metabolism disorder in mice. Sci Total Environ 631–632:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo T, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang X, Zhou J, Shen M, Zhao Y, Fu Z, Jin Y (2019) Maternal exposure to different sizes of polystyrene microplastics during gestation causes metabolic disorders in their offspring. Environ Pollut 255:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee MS, Lee JK, Lee SH, Zoh KD (2020) Occurrence of micropastics in the Han river and riverine fish in South Korea. Sci Total Environ 708:134535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Poulsen SS, Jackson P, Kling K, Knudsen KB, Skaug V, Kyjovska ZO, Thomsen BL et al (2016) Multi-walled carbon nanotube physicochemical properties predict pulmonary inflammation and genotoxicity. Nanotoxicology 10:1263–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2016.1202351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bendtsen KM, Brostrøm A, Koivisto AJ, Koponen I, Berthing T, Bertram N, Kling KI et al (2019) Airport emission particles: exposure characterization and toxicity following intratracheal instillation in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 16:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-019-0305-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Avio CG, Gorbi S, Milan M, Benedetti M, Fattorini D, D’Errico G, Pauletto M, Bargelloni L, Regoli F (2015) Pollutants bioavailability and toxicological risk from microplastics to marine mussels. Environ Pollut 198:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.12.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gambardella C, Morgana S, Ferrando S, Bramini M, Piazza V, Costa E, Garaventa F, Faimali M (2017) Effects of polystyrene microbeads in marine planktonic crustaceans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 145:25–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fonte E, Ferreira P, Guilhermino L (2016) Temperature rise and microplastics interact with the toxicity of the antibiotic cefalexin to juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): post-exposure predatory behaviour, acetylcholinesterase activity and lipid peroxidation. Aquat Toxicol 180:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.09.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stock V, Böhmert L, Lisicki E, Block R, Cara-Carmona J, Pack LK, Selb R et al (2019) Uptake and effects of orally ingested polystyrene microplastic particles in vitro and in vivo. Arch Toxicol 93:1817–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02478-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li B, Ding Y, Cheng X, Sheng D, Xu Z, Rong Q, Wu Y, Zhao H, Ji X, Zhang Y (2020) Polyethylene microplastics affect the distribution of gut microbiota and inflammation development in mice. Chemosphere 244:125492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Risk Assessment Program for Management of Microplastics Project, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (grant No. 2020003120002) and the educational training program for the management of information on the hazards and risk of chemical substances funded by the Ministry of Environment, Korea (entrusted to Korea Chemicals Management Association). This study was conducted as a part of the first author’s master’s thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Heo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

The original online version of this article was revised: In the Acknowledgements section of this article, the funding information was incorrect.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Y., Song, Y., Kim, G.W. et al. No prominent toxicity of polyethylene microplastics observed in neonatal mice following intratracheal instillation to dams during gestational and neonatal period. Toxicol Res. 37, 443–450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-020-00086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-020-00086-7

Keywords

Navigation