Abstract
This brief report assessed adolescents’ (n = 1720, M = 13.87 years old, SD = 2.17) ratings of moral violations under a moral foundations theory (MFT) paradigm. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used to control for the nested nature of school groups and explore relationships between gender, political identity, and moral violation ratings. Participants came from schools in predominantly conservative communities in the USA, and results show interaction effects between gender and conservative political identity for the physical harm to animals, physical harm to humans, emotional harm to humans, justice, and sanctity violation ratings. These findings provide a possible starting point for future studies of how sociocultural factors, internalized gender stereotypes, and political identity might influence moral intuition development during adolescence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data used in this study is freely available upon request from the author.
References
Bespalov, A., Prudnikova, M., Nyamdorj, B., & Vlasov, M. (2017). Life aspirations, values and moral foundations in Mongolian youth. Journal of Moral Education, 46(3), 258–271. eax. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1347087
Bretl, B. L. (2020). Assessing the structure of moral intuitions in early adolescence (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Bretl, B. L. (2021). Neural and Linguistic Considerations for Assessing Moral Intuitions Using Text-Based Stimuli. The Journal of Psychology, 155(1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2020.1832034
Cingel, D. P., & Krcmar, M. (2020). Considering moral foundations theory and the model of intuitive morality and exemplars in the context of child and adolescent development. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755337
Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
Day, M. V., Fiske, S. T., Downing, E. L., & Trail, T. E. (2014). Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1559–1573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214551152
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: Exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PloS one, 7(12), e50092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050092
Haidt, J. (2004). The Emotional Dog Gets Mistaken for a Possum. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.283
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2007). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), In Moral Psychology: The cognitive science of morality (2nd ed., pp. 181–217). MIT Press.
Hansen, D. M., Bretl, B. L., & Amini, B. (2019). Adolescent Development in Context: Social, Psychological, and Neurological Foundations. University of Kansas.
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology Justifies Morality: Political Beliefs Predict Moral Foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63, 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12448
Joeckel, S., Bowman, N. D., & Dogruel, L. (2012). Gut or Game? The Influence of Moral Intuitions on Decisions in Video Games. Media Psychology, 15(4), 460–485. ufh. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.727218
Joeckel, S., Bowman, N. D., & Dogruel, L. (2013). The Influence of Adolescents’ Moral Salience on Actions and Entertainment Experience in Interactive Media. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 480–506. ufh. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.781513
Khan, S. R., & Stagnaro, M. N. (2016). The Influence of Multiple Group Identities on Moral Foundations. Ethics & Behavior, 26(3), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1007997
McHugh, C., McGann, M., Igou, E. R., & Kinsella, E. L. (2021). Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC). Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990636
Tamborini, R. (2011). Moral intuition and media entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology:Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000031
Turiel, E. (1979). Social convention and morality: Two distinct conceptual and developmental systems. In Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 77–116). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243.
Villanueva-Blasco, V., & Grau-Alberola, E. (2019). Gender and age differences in the internalization of gender stereotypes in early and mid adolescence. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17(47), 107–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed Consent
Informed consent/assent was obtained from all research participants consistent with international codes of ethics and in compliance to IRB approved protocols. The protocol for this study was approved by the University of Kansas Institutional Review Board as STUDY00142366: “Character Foundations Survey (CFS) Reliability and Validation Study.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bretl, B.L. Adolescent Ratings of Moral Violations Moderated by Gender and Political Identity. Trends in Psychol. 30, 608–619 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-021-00120-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-021-00120-z