Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Considering Project Management Activities for Engineering Design Groups

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Operations Research Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the topic of benefit-augmenting project planning. Accept that an array of potentially beneficial activities is available, but restricted usable resources may not allow each of them to be pursued. Benefit profiles of undertakings are considered to be non-expanding aspects of the time of completion of activities. Formal numerical models are comprehensive for the different variants of the problem, including those incorporating a third group arrangement view. The nature of the problem is analyzed, and the degree of information is improved with respect to the importance of the undertaking, in particular. Future exploration territories include the identification of the general conditions under which the prioritization of tasks can contribute to an optimal arrangement. The increase of better upper limits of the verifiable list program is additionally a hobby. It would also be exciting to understand how the mutual deviation data can be fed back to the preceding phases of the choice of mission and booking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal S, Singh RK, Murtaza Q (2016) Prioritizing critical success factors for reverse logistics implementation using fuzzy-TOPSIS methodology. J Ind Eng Int 12:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alcaraz J, Maroto C (2001) A robust genetic algorithm for resource allocation in project scheduling. Ann Oper Res 102:83–109

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alcaraz J, Maroto C, Ruiz R (2003) Solving the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with genetic algorithms. J Oper Res Soc 54:614–626

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alham MH, Elshahed M, Ibrahim DK, El Zahab EEDA (2017) Optimal operation of power system incorporating wind energy with demand side management. Ain Shams Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.07.004

  5. Altintas C, Azizoglu M (2020) A resource constrained project scheduling problem with multi-modes. Int J Inf Technol Proj Manag 11:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alzraiee H, Zayed T, Moselhi O (2015) Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation. Autom Constr B 49:176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amans P, Mazars-Chapelon A, Villesèque-Dubus F (2015) Budgeting in institutional complexity: the case of performing arts organizations. Manag Account Res 27:47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andor G, Mohanty SK, Toth T (2015) Capital budgeting practices: a survey of Central and Eastern European firms. Emerg Mark Rev 23:148–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2015.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ardenghi JI, Vazquez GE, Brignole NB (2015) Parallel optimization by means of a Spectral-Projected-Gradient approach. Comput Chem Eng 81:344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arrow KJ, Lind RC (2014) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. J Nat Resour Policy Res 6:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Askin RG (2003) Multiproject Selection and Scheduling with Capacitated, Renewable Resources. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Portland, OR

  12. Bai A et al (2016) Social and economic possibilities for the energy utilization of fitomass in the valley of the river Hernád. Renew Energy 85:777–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balas E (1968) Project scheduling with resource constraints. DTIC Document

  14. Balas E (1969) Machine sequencing via disjunctive graphs: an implicit enumeration algorithm. Oper Res 17:941–957

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbosa J, Leitão P, Adam E, Trentesaux D (2015) Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: the ADACOR evolution. Comput Ind 66:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baumann T, Harfst S, Swanger A, Bayer D, Cell A, Boswell W (2015) Managing successful project teams in a diverse stakeholder environment: merging industry best practices with an education system to address critical human factors procedia. Soc Behav Sci 194:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Belbin RM (1975) Management teams: why they succeed or fail. Willey, New York

  18. Berre D, Vayssières J, Boussemart J-P, Leleu H, Tillard E, Lecomte P (2015) A methodology to explore the determinants of eco-efficiency by combining an agronomic whole-farm simulation model and efficient frontier. Environ Model Softw 71:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beşikci U, Bilge Ü, Ulusoy G (2015) Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem. Eur J Oper Res 240:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhanot N, Rao PV, Deshmukh SG (2015) Enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing: results from a survey of researchers and industry professionals. Procedia CIRP 29:562–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilolikar VS, Jain K, Sharma M (2016) An adaptive crossover genetic algorithm with simulated annealing for multi mode resource constrained project scheduling with discounted cash flows. Int J Oper Res 25:28–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bochenina K, Butakov N, Boukhanovsky A (2016) Static scheduling of multiple workflows with soft deadlines in non-dedicated heterogeneous environments. Futur Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.08.009

  23. Böttcher J, Drexl A, Kolisch R, Salewski F (1999) Project scheduling under partially renewable resource constraints. Manag Sci 45:543–559

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bouleimen K, Lecocq H (2003) A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version. Eur J Oper Res 149:268–281

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brucker P, Knust S (2003) Lower bounds for resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Eur J Oper Res 149:302–313

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brucker P, Knust S, Schoo A, Thiele O (1998) A branch and bound algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 107:272–288

    Google Scholar 

  27. Calantone R, Benedetto CD (2000) Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 47:232–244

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chakrabortty RK, Sarker RA, Essam DL (2016) Multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling under resource disruptions. Comput Chem Eng 88:13–29

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chakrabortty RK, Abbasi A, Ryan MJ (2020) Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling using modified variable neighborhood search heuristic. Int Trans Oper Res 27:138–167

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chen W-N, Zhang J (2013) Ant colony optimization for software project scheduling and staffing with an event-based scheduler. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen R, Sun H, Guo Q, Jin H, Wu W, Zhang B (2015) Profit-seeking energy-intensive enterprises participating in power system scheduling: model and mechanism. Appl Energy 158:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cherchi C, Badruzzaman M, Oppenheimer J, Bros CM, Jacangelo JG (2015) Energy and water quality management systems for water utility's operations: a review. J Environ Manag 153:108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chiu W-C, Peña JI, Wang C-W (2015) Industry characteristics and financial risk contagion. J Bank Financ 50:411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi B-C, Park M-J (2015) A continuous time–cost tradeoff problem with multiple milestones and completely ordered jobs. Eur J Oper Res 244:748–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Clark KB, Chew B, Fujimoto T (1987) Product development in the world auto industry. Brook Pap Econ Act 3:729–771

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen M, Eliashberg J, TH H (1996) New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Manag Sci 42:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  37. Damak N, Jarboui B, Siarry P, Loukil T (2009) Differential evolution for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Comput Oper Res 36:2653–2659

    Google Scholar 

  38. Datar S, Jordan C, Kekre S, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (1997) New product development structures and time-to-market. Manag Sci 43:452–464

    Google Scholar 

  39. Davis EW (1973) Project scheduling under resource constraints: historical review and categorisation of procedures. AIIE Trans 5:297–313

    Google Scholar 

  40. Davis EW, Heidorn GE (1971) An algorithm for optimal project scheduling under multiple resource constraints. Manag Sci 17:B-803–B-816

    Google Scholar 

  41. De Reyck B, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (1998) Local search methods for the discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project networks. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 45(6):553–578

  42. De Reyck B (1998) A branch-and-bound procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations. Eur J Oper Res 111:152–174

    Google Scholar 

  43. De Reyck B, Herroelen W (1998) An optimal procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows and generalized precedence relations. Comput Oper Res 25:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  44. De Reyck B, Herroelen W (1999) The multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations. Eur J Oper Res 119:538–556

    Google Scholar 

  45. Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (1992) A branch-and-bound procedure for the multiple resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Manag Sci 38:1803–1818

    Google Scholar 

  46. Demeulemeester EL, Herroelen WS (1996) An efficient optimal solution procedure for the preemptive resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 90:334–348

    Google Scholar 

  47. Demeulemeester EL, Herroelen WS (1997) A branch-and-bound procedure for the generalized resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Oper Res 45:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  48. Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (2000) The discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project networks: a branch-and-bound approach. IIE Trans 32:1059–1069

    Google Scholar 

  49. Demeulemeester EL, Herroelen WS (2002) Project scheduling: a research handbook. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York

  50. Demeulemeester EL, Herroelen WS (2006) Project scheduling: a research handbook, vol 49. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

  51. Dorndorf U, Pesch E, Phan-Huy T (2000) A time-oriented branch-and-bound algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling with generalised precedence constraints. Manag Sci 46:1365–1384

    Google Scholar 

  52. Drexl A, Gruenewald J (1993) Nonpreemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling. IIE Trans 25:74–81

    Google Scholar 

  53. Erenguc SS, Ahn T, Conway DG (2001) The resource constrained project scheduling problem with multiple crashable modes: an exact solution method. Nav Res Logist 48:107–127

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fang C, Kolisch R, Wang L, Mu C (2015) An estimation of distribution algorithm and new computational results for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Flex Serv Manuf J 27:585–605

    Google Scholar 

  55. Franck B, Neumann K, Schwindt C (2001) Truncated branch-and-bound, schedule-construction, and schedule-improvement procedures for resource-constrained project scheduling. OR-Spektrum 23:297–324

    Google Scholar 

  56. Furnham A, Steele H, Pendleton D (1993) A psychometric assessment of the Belbin team-role self-perception inventory. J Occup Organ Psychol 66:245–257

    Google Scholar 

  57. Geiger MJ (2017) A multi-threaded local search algorithm and computer implementation for the multi-mode, resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 256:729–741

    Google Scholar 

  58. Goto H, Yokoyama H (2015) Minimization of the makespan a project in the critical chain project management framework using a max-plus linear representation. In: Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, pp 234–238

  59. Hackman JR (1986) The psychology of self-management in organizations. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

  60. Hammer AL (1996) MBTI applications: a decade of research on the Myers-Briggs type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, San Jose

  61. Hartmann S (1998) A competitive genetic algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling. Nav Res Logist 45:733–750

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hartmann S (2001) Project scheduling with multiple modes: a genetic algorithm. Ann Oper Res 102:111–135

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hartmann S (2002) A self-adapting genetic algorithm for project scheduling under resource constraints. Nav Res Logist 49:433–448

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hartmann S, Drexl A (1998) Project scheduling with multiple modes: a comparison of exact algorithms. Networks 32:283–297

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hartmann S, Kolisch R (2000) Experimental evaluation of state-of-the-art heuristics for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 127:394–407

    Google Scholar 

  66. Heilmann R (2001) Resource–constrained project scheduling: a heuristic for the multi–mode case. OR-Spektrum 23:335–357

    Google Scholar 

  67. Heilmann R (2003) A branch-and-bound procedure for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with minimum and maximum time lags. Eur J Oper Res 144:348–365

    Google Scholar 

  68. Herrmann N (1991) The creative brain. J Creat Behav 25:275–295

    Google Scholar 

  69. Herroelen W (1972) Resource constrained project scheduling-the state of the art. Oper Res Q 23:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  70. Icmeli O, Erenguc SS (1996) A branch and bound procedure for the resource constrained project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows. Manag Sci 42:1395–1408

    Google Scholar 

  71. Igelmund G, Radermacher FJ (1983) Preselective strategies for the optimization of stochastic project networks under resource constraints. Networks 13:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  72. Jarboui B, Damak N, Siarry P, Rebai A (2008) A combinatorial particle swarm optimization for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Appl Math Comput 195:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  73. Javanmard H, Koraeizadeh A-W (2016) Optimizing the preventive maintenance scheduling by genetic algorithm based on cost and reliability in National Iranian Drilling Company. J Ind Eng Int 12:509–516

    Google Scholar 

  74. Józefowska J, Mika M, Różycki R, Waligóra G, Węglarz J (2001) Simulated annealing for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling. Ann Oper Res 102:137–155

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kelley JE (1963) The critical-path method: resources planning and scheduling. Ind Sched 13:347–365

    Google Scholar 

  76. Klein R (2000) Bidirectional planning: improving priority rule-based heuristics for scheduling resource-constrained projects. Eur J Oper Res 127:619–638

    Google Scholar 

  77. Klein R, Scholl A (2000) PROGRESS: optimally solving the generalized resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Math Meth Oper Res 52:467–488

    Google Scholar 

  78. Knotts G, Dror M, Hartman BC (2000) Agent-based project scheduling. IIE Trans 32:387–401

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kolbe K (2004) Pure instinct. Kolbe Corp, Phoenix. https://books.google.com/books?id=t9cCXZ-BvDwC&lpg=PP13&ots=frLHnFfxm&dq=Pure%20instinct&lr&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=Pure%20instinct&f=false

  80. Kolisch R (1996a) Efficient priority rules for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. J Oper Manag 14:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kolisch R (1996b) Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: theory and computation. Eur J Oper Res 90:320–333

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kolisch R, Drexl A (1997) Local search for nonpreemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling. IIE Trans 29:987–999

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kolisch R, Sprecher A (1997) PSPLIB-a project scheduling problem library: OR software-ORSEP operations research software exchange program. Eur J Oper Res 96:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lemos FK, Cherri AC, de Araujo SA (2020) The cutting stock problem with multiple manufacturing modes applied to a construction industry. Int J Prod Res:1–19

  85. Leyman P, Vanhoucke M (2017) Capital-and resource-constrained project scheduling with net present value optimization. Eur J Oper Res 256:757–776

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lova A, Tormos P, Cervantes M, Barber F (2009) An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling projects with resource constraints and multiple execution modes. Int J Prod Econ 117:302–316

    Google Scholar 

  87. Masmoudi M, HaïT A (2013) Project scheduling under uncertainty using fuzzy modelling and solving techniques. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26:135–149

    Google Scholar 

  88. Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Mohrman AMJ (1995) Designing team-based organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco

    Google Scholar 

  89. Muritiba AEF, Rodrigues CD, da Costa FA (2018) A path-relinking algorithm for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res 92:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  90. Musselwhile WC (1990) Time-based innovation: the new competitive advantage. Train Dev J 44(1):53–57

  91. Neumann K, Zimmermann J (2000) Procedures for resource leveling and net present value problems in project scheduling with general temporal and resource constraints. Eur J Oper Res 127:425–443

    Google Scholar 

  92. Patterson JH (1984) A comparison of exact approaches for solving the multiple constrained resource, project scheduling problem. Manag Sci 30:854–867

    Google Scholar 

  93. Petković D (2015) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy optimization of the net present value and internal rate of return of a wind farm project under wake effect. J CENTRUM Cathedra Bus Econ Res J 8:11–28

    Google Scholar 

  94. Qureshi SM, Kang C (2015) Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. Int J Proj Manag 33:165–176

    Google Scholar 

  95. Rabieh M, Soukhakian MA, Shirazi ANM (2016) Two models of inventory control with supplier selection in case of multiple sourcing: a case of Isfahan Steel Company. J Ind Eng Int 12:243–254

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ranjbar M, De Reyck B, Kianfar F (2009) A hybrid scatter search for the discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 193:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  97. Ranjbar M, Khalilzadeh M, Kianfar F, Etminani K (2012) An optimal procedure for minimizing total weighted resource tardiness penalty costs in the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Comput Ind Eng 62:264–270

    Google Scholar 

  98. Rathi R, Khanduja D, Sharma SK (2016) Efficacy of fuzzy MADM approach in Six Sigma analysis phase in automotive sector. J Ind Eng Int 12(3):377–387

  99. Robinson WT, Fornell C (1985) Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. J Mark Res 13(1):107–116

  100. Roghanian E, Alipour M, Rezaei M (2018) An improved fuzzy critical chain approach in order to face uncertainty in project scheduling. Int J Constr Manag 18:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  101. Schirmer A (2000) Case-based reasoning and improved adaptive search for project scheduling. Nav Res Logist 47:201–222

    Google Scholar 

  102. Schirmer A (2001) Resource-constrained project scheduling: an evaluation of adaptive control schemes for parameterized sampling heuristics. Int J Prod Res 39:1343–1365

    Google Scholar 

  103. Schnell A, Hartl RF (2016) On the efficient modeling and solution of the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations. Oper Res Spectr 38:283–303

    Google Scholar 

  104. Schrage L (1970) Solving resource-constrained network problems by implicit enumeration - nonpreemptive case. Oper Res 18:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  105. Schrage L (1972) Solving resource-constrained network problems by implicit enumeration—preemptive case. Oper Res 20:668–677

    Google Scholar 

  106. Shahriari M (2016) Multi-objective optimization of discrete time–cost tradeoff problem in project networks using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. J Ind Eng Int 12:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  107. Slem C, Levi D (1995) Team work in research and development organizations: the characteristics of successful teams. Int J Ind Ergon 16:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  108. Sprecher A (2000) Scheduling resource-constrained projects competitively at modest memory requirements. Manag Sci 46:710–723

    Google Scholar 

  109. Sprecher A, Drexl A (1998) Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling by a simple, general and powerful sequencing algorithm. Eur J Oper Res 107:431–450

    Google Scholar 

  110. Sprecher A, Kolisch R, Drexl A (1995) Semi-active, active, and non-delay schedules for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 80:94–102

    Google Scholar 

  111. Sprecher A, Hartmann S, Drexl A (1997) An exact algorithm for project scheduling with multiple modes. OR-Spektrum 19:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  112. Stinson JP, Davis EW, Khumawala BM (1978) Multiple resource–constrained scheduling using branch and bound. AIIE Trans 10:252–259

    Google Scholar 

  113. Talbot FB, Patterson JH (1978) An efficient integer programming algorithm with network cuts for solving resource-constrained scheduling problems. Manag Sci 24:1163–1174

    Google Scholar 

  114. Tormos P, Lova A (2001) A competitive heuristic solution technique for resource-constrained project scheduling. Ann Oper Res 102:65–81

    Google Scholar 

  115. Tormos P, Lova A (2003) An efficient multi-pass heuristic for project scheduling with constrained resources. Int J Prod Res 41:1071–1086

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ulusoy G, Sivrikaya-Şerifoğlu F, Şahin Ş (2001) Four payment models for the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem with discounted cash flows. Ann Oper Res 102:237–261

    Google Scholar 

  117. Urban GL, Carter T, Gaskin S, Mucha Z (1986) Market share rewards to pioneering brands: an empirical analysis and strategic implications. Manag Sci 32:645–659

    Google Scholar 

  118. Van Den Eeckhout M, Maenhout B, Vanhoucke M (2019) A heuristic procedure to solve the project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs and personnel scheduling constraints. Comput Oper Res 101:144–161

    Google Scholar 

  119. Van Peteghem V, Vanhoucke M (2010) A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur J Oper Res 201:409–418

    Google Scholar 

  120. Vanhoucke M, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (2001a) An exact procedure for the resource-constrained weighted earliness–tardiness project scheduling problem. Ann Oper Res 102:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  121. Vanhoucke M, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (2001b) On maximizing the net present value of a project under renewable resource constraints. Manag Sci 47:1113–1121

    Google Scholar 

  122. Vommi VB, Kakollu SR (2017) A simple approach to multiple attribute decision making using loss functions. J Ind Eng Int 13(1):107–116

  123. Wechsler D (1997) Cognitive, conative, and non-intellective intelligence (1950). In: Notterman JM (Ed.), The evolution of psychology: Fifty years of the American Psychologist. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 22–32

  124. Xu J, Zheng H, Zeng Z, Wu S, Shen M (2012) Discrete time–cost–environment trade-off problem for large-scale construction systems with multiple modes under fuzzy uncertainty and its application to Jinping-II Hydroelectric Project. Int J Proj Manag 30:950–966

    Google Scholar 

  125. Xu M, Ouyang M, Mao Z, Xu X (2019) Improving repair sequence scheduling methods for postdisaster critical infrastructure systems. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 34:506–522

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

    Abdollah Arasteh

Authors
  1. Abdollah Arasteh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdollah Arasteh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arasteh, A. Considering Project Management Activities for Engineering Design Groups. SN Oper. Res. Forum 1, 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-00037-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-00037-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation