Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Chromosomal Polymorphism and Male Reproductive Abnormalities

  • Male Reproduction: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the association between chromosomal polymorphisms and abnormalities in male reproductive health. Within the period from January 2018 to December 2022, a cohort of 10,827 males seeking fertility services at our reproductive center was selected for inclusion in this study. Peripheral blood chromosomal karyotype analysis was conducted for each participant to identify carriers of chromosomal polymorphisms, who were subsequently categorized into a polymorphism group. Additionally, a control group was constituted by randomly selecting 1,630 patients exhibiting normal chromosomal karyotypes. The study conducted statistical analyses to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups, focusing on infertility, history of spontaneous miscarriage in partners, anomalies in reproductive development, fetal abnormalities, and sperm quality metrics. (1) Among the cohort of 10,827 males, chromosomal polymorphisms were identified in 1,622 participants, yielding a detection rate of 14.98%. This rate is significantly elevated in comparison to the baseline prevalence of 1.77% observed in the general population. (2) The predominant variant among these polymorphisms was related to the Y chromosome, accounting for 1,082 cases (66.71% of the polymorphic findings), corresponding to a detection rate of 9.99%. This is markedly higher than the approximate 0.09% prevalence noted within a normative demographic. (3) Statistical analysis revealed significant disparities between the chromosomal polymorphism group and the control group in several clinical outcomes. Notably, the rates of spontaneous abortion (18.06% vs. 1.35%), fetal anomalies (1.97% vs. 0.25%), and poor sperm quality (41.74% vs. 7.18%) were markedly higher in the polymorphism group. Additionally, incidences of testicular dysgenesis (2.28% vs. 0.92%) and hypogonadism in partners (0.62% vs. 0.37%) also demonstrated significant differences, underscoring the potential reproductive implications of chromosomal polymorphisms. The study establishes a significant link between chromosomal polymorphisms and critical reproductive outcomes, including male infertility, spontaneous miscarriages in partners, fetal anomalies, and reduced sperm quality. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of chromosomal polymorphisms in reproductive health assessments and suggest the necessity for their consideration in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for male reproductive disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbaspour S, Isazadeh A, Heidari M, Heidari M, Hajazimian S, Soleyman-Nejad M, Heidari M. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in Iranian patients with infertility. Arch Iran Med. 2023;26(2):110–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, Goddijn M. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. Hum Reprod open. 2023;2023(1):hoad002.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalcante MB, Sampaio OGM, Câmara FEA, Barini R. (2023). ESHRE guideline update 2022: new perspectives in the management of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Am J Reprod Immunol, 90(2), e13739.

  4. Cheng R, Ma Y, Nie Y, Qiao X, Yang Z, Zeng R, Xu L. Chromosomal polymorphisms are associated with female infertility and adverse reproductive outcomes after infertility treatment: a 7-year retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(1):72–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding H, Duan H, Zhu X, Liu W, Gu L, Li H, Li J. Analysis of genetic etiology and related factors in 1 065 women with spontaneous abortions. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Yixue Yichuanxue Zazhi = Chin J Med Genet. 2023;40(4):446–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu M, Chen M, Guo N, Lin M, Li Y, Huang H, Xu L. Molecular genetic analysis of 1,980 cases of male infertility. Experimental Therapeutic Med. 2023;26(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freitas PHF, Oliveira HR, Silva FF, Fleming A, Miglior F, Schenkel FS, Brito LF. Genomic analyses for predicted milk fatty acid composition throughout lactation in North American Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(7):6318–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo Y, XIA Z, Cui W, Chen C, Jin X, Zhu B. Joint Genetic Analyses of Mitochondrial and Y-Chromosome molecular markers for a Population from Northwest China. Genes. 2020;11(5):564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Karaca Y, Pariltay E, Mardan L, Karaca E, Durmaz A, Durmaz B, Cogulu O. Co-occurrences of polymorphic heterochromatin regions of chromosomes and effect on reproductive failure. Reprod Biol. 2020;20(1):42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mateu-Brull E, Rodrigo L, Peinado V, Mercader A, Campos-Galindo I, Bronet F, Rubio C. Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:2547–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mottola F, Santonastaso M, Ronga V, Finelli R, Rocco L. Polymorphic rearrangements of human chromosome 9 and male infertility: new evidence and impact on spermatogenesis. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A, Menten B, Heindryckx B. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):313–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Queremel MD, Tadi P. (2023), Genetics. Chromosome Abnormalities

  14. Repalle D, Saritha KVR, Bhandari S. Sperm DNA fragmentation negatively influences the cumulative live birth rate in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles of couples with unexplained infertility. Clin Experimental Reproductive Med. 2022;49(3):185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sismani C, Rapti SM, Iliopoulou P, Spring A, Neroutsou R, Lagou M, Velissariou V. Novel pericentric inversion inv (9)(p23q22. 3) in unrelated individuals with fertility problems in the southeast European population. J Hum Genet. 2020;65(9):783–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seo J, Lee SM, Han JH, Shin NH, Lee YK, Kim B, Koh HJ. Characterization of the common Japonica-originated genomic regions in the high-yielding varieties developed from inter-subspecific crosses in temperate rice (Oryza sativa L). Genes. 2020;11(5):562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shang L, Smith JA, Zhao W, Kho M, Turner ST, Mosley TH, Zhou X. Genetic architecture of gene expression in European and African americans: an eQTL mapping study in GENOA. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(4):496–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson A, Watt K, Ma S. The incidence of long heterochromatic polymorphism variants in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(2):219–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Kadarmideen HN. Metabolite genome-wide association study (mGWAS) and gene-metabolite interaction network analysis reveal potential biomarkers for feed efficiency in pigs. Metabolites. 2020;10(5):201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project comes from the Weifang Science and Technology Development Plan project (project number: 2020YX042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guiling Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Jiang, J., Yang, Q. et al. The Relationship Between Chromosomal Polymorphism and Male Reproductive Abnormalities. Reprod. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01530-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01530-x

Keywords

Navigation