Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Whither Reproduction? How to Insert Science into the Debate About How Societies Create Families

  • Perspective, opinions and commentaries
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It sometimes appears that science is moving in one direction and society is moving in another. When we act as physicians, we are compelled to care for the patient in front of us in a one-on-one relationship. When we act as reproductive scientists, we strive to care for humanity writ large. However, there is an intermediate social structure that we do not always take into account, and that is the social structure of society. This is the framework that we inhabit as individuals and as families. The field of reproductive science has made extraordinary advances that we apply every day in our medical practice. In this discussion, I urge you to contemplate the societal impact of these advances, how we have adapted, and finally how we might inform the public debate about reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Monroy De Velasco A. Consequences of early childbearing. Draper Fund Rep. 1982 Dec;(11):26–7. PMID: 12264602.

  2. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss MJ, Spitznagel EL, et al. Maternal age and risk of labor and delivery complications. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(6):1202–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1624-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bongaarts J, Blanc AK. Estimating the current mean age of mothers at the birth of their first child from household surveys. Popul Health Metr. 2015;13:25. Published 2015 14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0058-9

  4. Fletcher JM, Wolfe BL. The effects of teenage fatherhood on young adult outcomes. Econ Inq. 2012;50(1):182–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00372.x. (PMID: 22329053).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirowsky J. Parenthood and health: the pivotal and optimal age at first birth. Soc Forces. 2002;81:315–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawson G, Fletcher R. Delayed fatherhood. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Oct;40(4):283–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100866. (Epub 2014 Jun 23 PMID: 24958072).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanette Santoro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

NS serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Menogenix, Inc, Astellas Pharma, and Que Oncology. She is a consultant for Ansh Labs and Amazon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santoro, N. Whither Reproduction? How to Insert Science into the Debate About How Societies Create Families. Reprod. Sci. 30, 326–329 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01020-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01020-y

Keywords

Navigation