Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Placenta Accreta has a Low Association with Hypertensive Disease During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review Incorporating a Network Meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstracts

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. A systematic literature search in OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google scholar up to May 2021 was done, and 4 studies were found including 47,353 pregnant women at the start of the study; 4283 of them had hypertensive disease during pregnancy and 493 had placenta accreta. They were reporting relationships between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to assess the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta using the dichotomous with a random or fixed-effect model. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy was significantly related to lower prevalence of placenta accreta (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, .38-.94, p = 0.03) compared with control (no hypertensive disease during pregnancy). When looking at the result comparing the prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy in women with placenta accreta compared with control (no placenta accreta), we found that the placenta accreta was significantly related to lower prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38–0.94, p = 0.03) compared with control. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy may have a lower prevalence of placenta accreta. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OR:

Odds ratio

CIs:

Confidence intervals

References

  1. Dreux S, et al. Second-trimester maternal serum markers and placenta accreta. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(10):1010–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:873929. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/873929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Orbach A, et al. Peripartum cesarean hysterectomy: critical analysis of risk factors and trends over the years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):480–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Korejo R, et al. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(12):1322–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khong T, et al. Pregnancies complicated by retained placenta: sex ratio and relation to pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 1998;19(8):577–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gielchinsky Y, et al. Placenta accreta—summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta. 2002;23(2–3):210–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Usta IM, et al. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):1045–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzpatrick KE, et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PloS one. 2012;7(12):e52893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowman ZS, et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(09):799–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eshkoli T, et al. Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(3):219.e1-219.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stroup DF, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta A, et al. Obesity is Independently Associated With Increased Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer–related Mortality. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(9):874–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Collaboration C. RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Available at (Accessed December 6, 2019): bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials, 2020.

  16. Higgins JP, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hung T-H, et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(4):545–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheiner E, et al. Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10(6):414–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alves E, et al. Impact of risk factors on hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, in primiparae and multiparae. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40(5):377–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tantbirojn P, Crum C, Parast M. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta. 2008;29(7):639–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan D, Li S, Wu S, Wang W, Ye S, Xia Q, Liu L, Feng J, Wu S, Guo X, Liu Z. Prevalence of abnormally invasive placenta among deliveries in mainland China. Medicine. 2017;96(16):e6636. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Basta P, et al. The frequency of CD25+ CD4+ and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in ectopic endometrium and ectopic decidua. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwede S, Alfer J, Von Rango U. Differences in regulatory T-cell and dendritic cell pattern in decidual tissue of placenta accreta/increta cases. Placenta. 2014;35(6):378–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yliniemi A, et al. Combination of PAPPA, fhCGβ, AFP, PIGF, sTNFR1, and maternal characteristics in prediction of early-onset preeclampsia. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015;9:CMRH. S21865.

  26. Desai N, et al. Elevated first trimester PAPP-A is associated with increased risk of placenta accreta. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(2):159–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lash GE, Ernerudh J. Decidual cytokines and pregnancy complications: focus on spontaneous miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;108:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feldman DR, et al. Phase I trial of bevacizumab plus escalated doses of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McMahon K, et al. Does soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 regulate placental invasion? Insight from the invasive placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):68.e1-68.e4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moustafa IO, et al. Clinical outcome associated with the use of different inhalation method with and without humidification in asthmatic mechanically ventilated patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:40–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moustafa IO, et al. Lung deposition and systemic bioavailability of different aerosol devices with and without humidification in mechanically ventilated patients. Heart Lung. 2017;46(6):464–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ali AMA, Abdelrahim MEA. Modeling and optimization of terbutaline emitted from a dry powder inhaler and influence on systemic bioavailability using data mining technology. J Pharm Innov. 2014;9(1):38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdelrahim M, Assi KH, Chrystyn H. Dose emission and aerodynamic characterization of the terbutaline sulphate dose emitted from a Turbuhaler at low inhalation flow. Pharm Dev Technol. 2013;18(4):944–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Elgendy MO, Abdelrahim ME, Eldin RS. Potential benefit of repeated MDI inhalation technique counselling for patients with asthma. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2015;22(6):318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Szymusik I, et al. Perinatal outcome of in vitro fertilization singletons – 10 years’ experience of one center. Arch Med Sci. 2019;15(3):666–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A as a predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16(1):8–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fijałkowska A, et al. Pregnancy as a predictor of deviations from the recommended diagnostic pathway in women with suspected pulmonary embolism: ZATPOL registry data. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(4):838–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hao Y, Sun X, Wen N, Song D, Li H. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/141577.

  39. Wang W, et al. Association between hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy and risk of placenta accreta: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2018;37(3):168–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the help of Miss Nada Mohamed A Elkamel for her help in improving the quality of our figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(1) Conception and design: Lingli Li.

(2) Administrative support: All authors.

(3) Provision of study materials or subjects: All authors.

(4) Collection and assembly of data: Luping Liu, YuYue Xu.

(5) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors.

(6) Manuscript writing: All authors.

(7) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingli Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Liu, L. & Xu, Y. Placenta Accreta has a Low Association with Hypertensive Disease During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review Incorporating a Network Meta-analysis. Reprod. Sci. 29, 2119–2126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00938-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00938-7

Keywords

Navigation