Skip to main content

The Effects of Different Post-thawed Culture Periods on Clinical Outcomes in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of different post-thawed culture periods on the clinical outcomes. 9381 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were divided into three groups according to female age: < 35, 35–39, and > 39 years, and two groups depending on post-thawed culture period before transfer: short culture (2–3 h) group (S) and long culture (18–20 h) group (L). According to the increment number of post-thawed embryos, the L group divided into three groups: ≤ 2, one ≤ 2 and the other > 2, and > 2 groups. Pregnancy outcomes included the implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), live birth rate (LBR), and neonatal characteristics. Long post-thawed culture caused a significant increase in the IR, CPR, MPR, and LBR (p = 0.000, 0.004, 0.037, and 0.001; CI = 1.06–1.194, 1.042–1.237, 1.008–1.254, and 1.054–1.245, respectively), and blastomere increment number also had a significant effect on IR, CPR, MPR, and LBR (p = 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively). No significant differences were present in neonatal characteristics between the two post-thawed culture groups. Singleton group had a higher average gestational age and birthweight as well as a lower cesarean section rate, preterm labor rate, and low birthweight rate than twins group. Long post-thawed culture was associated with higher IR, CPR, MPR, and LBR, and transferring a well-developed embryo after long post-thawed culture might be a viable embryo transfer strategy to decrease MPR while maintaining CPR and LBR.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:270–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:126–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:808–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wong KM, Van WM, Mol F, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bourdon M, Maignien C, Pocate CK, Plu Bureau G, Marcellin L, et al. The freeze-all strategy after IVF: which indications? Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;42:529–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Veleva Z, Orava M, Nuojua HS, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2425–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Mäkinen S, Karro H, Roos A, et al. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2368–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kong X, Yang S, Gong F, Lu C, Zhang S, et al. The relationship between cell number, division behavior and developmental potential of cleavage stage human embryos: a time-lapse study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Van LL, Van WM, Van VF, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li B, Huang J, Li L, He X, Wang M, et al. Improving the clinical outcomes by extended culture of day 3 embryos with low blastomere number to blastocyst stage following frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;303:573–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao P, Li M, Lian Y, Zheng X, Liu P, Qiao J. The clinical outcomes of day 3 4-cell embryos after extended in vitro culture. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rato ML, Gouveia-Oliveira A, Plancha CE. Influence of post-thaw culture on the developmental potential of human frozen embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:789–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guo L, Luo C, Quan S, Chen L, Li H, Guo Y, et al. The outcomes of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:1589–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270-83

  17. 17.

    Li YH, Yu P, Li N, Cai XX, Zhang LG. Impact of thawing D3 embryos in advance on clinical outcome in patient of different ages. J Reprod Med. 2020;3:358–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang S, Lu C, Lin G, Gong F, Lu G. The number of blastomeres in post-thawing embryos affects the rates of pregnancy and delivery in freeze-embryo-transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:569–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Milachich T, Shterev A. Are there optimal numbers of oocytes, spermatozoa and embryos in assisted reproduction? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016;20:142–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1310–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhu Q, Lin J, Gao H, Wang N, Wang B, et al. The association between embryo quality, number of transferred embryos and live birth rate after vitrified cleavage-stage embryos and blastocyst transfer. Front Physiol. 2020;11:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hui D, Han X, Wang X, Ren W, Lei X, et al. Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:945–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon SH, Koh MW, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:423–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li RS, Hwu YM, Lee RK, Li SH, Lin MH. Day 4 good morula embryo transfer provided compatible live birth rate with day 5 blastocyst embryo in fresh IVF/ET cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57:52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, Biba M, Perdikaris A, et al. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:573–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Casper RF. Prolonged culture of blastocysts after thawing as a tool for improving prediction of success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:2195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants and staff at IVF Center, Mali Hospital, Haikou, China and the Hospital of Shenzhen Immigration Inspection, Shenzhen, China.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was designed by YHL, BM, and LGZ. XXC, NL, and YHL were involved in planning and managing the data collection. YHL and BM were involved in the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript with support and critical review from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuhu Li or Bo Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Mali Hospital on March 8, 2020 (NO. 01/MH/2020).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Yuhu Li and Xuexiang Cai are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Cai, X., Li, N. et al. The Effects of Different Post-thawed Culture Periods on Clinical Outcomes in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle. Reprod. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00760-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Post-thawed culture period
  • Blastomere increment number
  • Neonatal characteristics
  • Live birth rate