Abstract
Many functional activities of endometrium epithelium are energy consuming which are very important for maintaining intrauterine environment needed by early embryonic development and establishment of implantation window. Glucose is a main energy supplier and one of the main components of intrauterine fluid. Obviously, glucose transports in endometrium epithelium involve in for these activities but their functions have not been elucidated. In this research, we observed a spatiotemporal pattern of sodium glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1) expression in the mouse endometrium. We also determined that progesterone can promote the expression of SGLT1 in the mouse endometrial epithelium in response to the action of oestrogen. Treatment with the SGLT1 inhibitor phlorizin or small interfering RNA specific for SGLT1 (SGLT1-siRNA) altered glucose uptake in primary cultured endometrial epithelial cells, which exhibited reduced ATP levels and AMPK activation. The injection of phlorizin or SGLT1-siRNA into one uterine horn of each mouse on day 2 of pregnancy led to an increased glucose concentration in the uterine fluid and decreased number of harvested normal blastocysts and decreased expression of integrin αVβ3 in endometrial epithelium and increased expression of mucin 1 and lactoferrin in endometrial epithelium and the uterine homogenates exhibited activated AMPK, a decreased ATP level on day 4, and a decreased number of implantation sites on day 5. In embryo transfer experiments, pre-treatment of the uterine horn with phlorizin or SGLT1-siRNA during the implantation window led to a decreased embryo implantation rate on day 5 of pregnancy, even when embryos from normal donor mice were used. In conclusion, SGLT1, which participates in glucose transport in the mouse endometrial epithelium, inhibition and/or reduced expression of SGLT1 affects early embryo development by altering the glucose concentration in the uterine fluid. Inhibition and/or reduced expression of SGLT1 also affects embryo implantation by influencing energy metabolism in epithelial cells, which consequently influences implantation-related functional activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cha J, Sun X, Dey S. Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat Med. 2012;18(12):1754–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3012.
Aplin J, Ruane P. Embryo-epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.175943.
Surveyor G, Gendler S, Pemberton L, Das S, Chakraborty I, Julian J, et al. Expression and steroid hormonal control of Muc-1 in the mouse uterus. Endocrinology. 1995;136(8):3639–47. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.136.8.7628404.
Ye X. Uterine Luminal Epithelium as the Transient Gateway for Embryo Implantation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(2):165–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2019.11.008.
Sun X, Bartos A, Whitsett J, Dey S. Uterine deletion of Gp130 or Stat3 shows implantation failure with increased estrogenic responses. Mol Endocrinol. 2013;27(9):1492–501. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2013-1086.
Teng C. Factors regulating lactoferrin gene expression. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(3):263–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/o06-034.
McMaster M, Teng C, Dey S, Andrews G. Lactoferrin in the mouse uterus: analyses of the preimplantation period and regulation by ovarian steroids. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6(1):101–11. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.6.1.1738363.
Wang H, Dey S. Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(3):185–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1808.
Frolova A, O'Neill K, Moley K. Dehydroepiandrosterone inhibits glucose flux through the pentose phosphate pathway in human and mouse endometrial stromal cells, preventing decidualization and implantation. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(8):1444–55. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2011-0026.
Zhang XQ, Zhao D, Ma YD, Wang YC, Yue LM, et al. Impact of Disturbed Glucose Homeostasis Regulated by AMPK in Endometrium on Embryo Implantation in Diabetes Mice. Reprod Sci. 2020;27:1752–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00169-8.
Kahn B, Alquier T, Carling D, Hardie D. AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism. Cell Metab. 2005;1(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2004.12.003.
Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang H, Duan E. Uterine Fluid in Pregnancy: A Biological and Clinical Outlook. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(7):604–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2017.05.002.
Gardner D, Lane M, Calderon I, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58097-2.
Simpson I, Dwyer D, Malide D, Moley K, Travis A, Vannucci S. The facilitative glucose transporter GLUT3: 20 years of distinction. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295(2):E242–53. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90388.2008.
Koepsell H. The Na+-D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2 are targets for the treatment of diabetes and cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;170:148–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.10.017.
Wright EM, Turk E. The sodium/glucose cotransport family SLC5. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447(5):510–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-003-1063-6.
Dominguez Rieg J, Chirasani V, Koepsell H, Senapati S, Mahata S, Rieg T. Regulation of intestinal SGLT1 by catestatin in hyperleptinemic type 2 diabetic mice. Lab Investig. 2016;96(1):98–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2015.129.
Scafoglio C, Hirayama BA, Kepe V, Liu J, Ghezzi C, Satyamurthy N, et al. Functional expression of sodium-glucose transporters in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(30):E4111. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511698112.
Wright EM, Ghezzi C, Loo DDF. Novel and Unexpected Functions of SGLTs. Physiology. 2017;32(6):435–43. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00021.2017.
Casneuf V, Fonteyne P, Van Damme N, Demetter P, Pauwels P, de Hemptinne B, et al. Expression of SGLT1, Bcl-2 and p53 in primary pancreatic cancer related to survival. Cancer Investig. 2008;26(8):852–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900801956363.
Guo G, Cai Y, Zhang B, Xu R, Qiu H, Xia L, et al. Overexpression of SGLT1 and EGFR in colorectal cancer showing a correlation with the prognosis. Med Oncol. 2011:S197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9696-8.
Salker M, Singh Y, Zeng N, Chen H, Zhang S, Umbach A, et al. Loss of Endometrial Sodium Glucose Cotransporter SGLT1 is Detrimental to Embryo Survival and Fetal Growth in Pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11674-3.
Ehrenkranz JRL, Lewis NG, Ronald Kahn C, Roth J. Phlorizin: a review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;21(1):31–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.532.
Banerjee S, Wang D, Alzamora R, Huang X, Pastor-Soler N, Hallows K, et al. SGLT1, a novel cardiac glucose transporter, mediates increased glucose uptake in PRKAG2 cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49(4):683–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.06.003.
Pan J, Yuan D, Zhao Y, Nie L, Lei Y, Liu M, et al. Progesterone-induced miR-133a inhibits the proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2017;219(3):683–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12762.
Kover K, Liang L, Andrews G, Dey S. Differential expression and regulation of cytokine genes in the mouse uterus. Endocrinology. 1995;136(4):1666–73. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.136.4.7895677.
Nie L, Zhao Y, Zhao D, Long Y, Lei Y, Liu M, et al. Progesterone-induced miR-152 interferes with embryonic implantation by downregulating GLUT3 in endometrial epithelium. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;316(4):E557–E67. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00245.2018.
Gellersen B, Brosens J. Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(6):851–905. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2014-1045.
Sun X, Zhang L, Xie H, Wan H, Magella B, Whitsett JA, et al. Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) is critical for conferring uterine receptivity to implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(4):1145–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118411109.
Conaghan J, Handyside AH, Winston RM, Leese HJ. Effects of pyruvate and glucose on the development of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;99(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990087.
Torner E, Bussalleu E, Briz MD, Yeste M, Bonet S. Energy substrate influences the effect of the timing of the first embryonic cleavage on the development of in vitro-produced porcine embryos in a sex-related manner. Mol Reprod Dev. 2013;80(11):924–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22229.
Mullen MP, Bazer FW, Wu G, Parr MH, Evans ACO, Crowe MA, et al. Effects of systemic progesterone during the early luteal phase on the availabilities of amino acids and glucose in the bovine uterine lumen. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;26(2):282–92. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd12319.
Gao H, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Li X, Bazer FW. Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen. I. Amino acids, glucose, and ions in uterine lumenal flushings of cyclic and pregnant ewes. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(1):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.071597.
Harris SE, Gopichandran N, Picton HM, Leese HJ, Orsi NM. Nutrient concentrations in murine follicular fluid and the female reproductive tract. Theriogenology. 2005;64(4):992–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.01.004.
Wales R, Edirisinghe W. Volume of fluid and concentration of cations and energy substrates in the uteri of mice during early pseudopregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1989;1(2):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd9890171.
Ruan Y, Chen H, Chan H. Ion channels in the endometrium: regulation of endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(4):517–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu006.
Gardner DK, Lane M, Calderon I, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58097-2.
Ivanisević M, Buković D, Starcević V, Djelmis J, Pfeifer D. Influence of hyperglycemia on early embryonal growth in IDDM pregnant women. Coll Antropol. 1999;23(1):183–8.
Padmanabhan R, Shafiullah M. Effect of maternal diabetes and ethanol interactions on embryo development in the mouse. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;261:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mcbi.0000028736.00532.1e.
Moley KH, Vaughn WK, DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Effect of diabetes mellitus on mouse pre-implantation embryo development. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;93(2):325–32. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0930325.
Ponce ACP, Monsalve MCR, Garibay MAP, Andrade SI. Effect of maternal diabetes on human and rat fetal development. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2005;73(10):544–52.
Suman P, Malhotra S, Gupta S. LIF-STAT signaling and trophoblast biology. JAK-STAT. 2013;2(4):e25155. https://doi.org/10.4161/jkst.25155.
Nilsson O. The morphology of blastocyst implantation. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;39(1):187–94. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0390187.
Lin S, Hardie D. AMPK: Sensing Glucose as well as Cellular Energy Status. Cell Metab. 2018;27(2):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31471105 and No.31900822, URL: http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/). Support from Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No.2020YJ0486, URL: http://202.61.89.120/). Support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities from Northwest Minzu University (No.31920180028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 2356 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Lx., Song, Jw., Ma, Yd. et al. Expression of SGLT1 in the Mouse Endometrial Epithelium and its Role in Early Embryonic Development and Implantation. Reprod. Sci. 28, 3094–3108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00480-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00480-y