Skip to main content
Log in

Heat Shock Protein 60 (HSP60) Serves as a Potential Target for the Sensitization of Chemoresistant Ovarian Cancer Cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

HSP60 is a mitochondrial chaperone protein that is associated with decreased overall survival of ovarian cancer patients. We determined whether targeting HSP60 with its monoclonal antibody would induce cytotoxicity in sensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells and whether it is synergistic when combined with chemotherapeutic drugs. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells and their docetaxel- or cisplatin-resistant counterparts were utilized. HSP60 mRNA levels were determined by real-time RT-PCR. Cytotoxicity of HSP60 antibody (0.5 or 1.5 μg/ml) alone and in combination with chemotherapy were assessed by MTT Cell Proliferation Assay. Unpaired t tests were used to compare groups for real-time RT-PCR. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction was performed for cytotoxicity comparisons. Significant synergistic effects of the antibody combined with chemotherapy were determined by the CompuSyn Software. Basal HSP60 mRNA levels were increased in chemoresistant EOC cells as compared with their sensitive counterparts (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cytotoxicity between EOC cell types; however, treatment with the HSP60 antibody for 24 h showed a dose response (0.5 and 1.5 μg/ml) cytotoxic effect to both sensitive and chemoresistant EOC cells as compared with the isotype control (p < 0.05). Importantly, treatment with both doses of HSP60 antibody was not cytotoxic to normal macrophages. Combination of the HSP60 antibody with docetaxel or cisplatin was significantly synergistic in both sensitive and chemoresistant EOC cells. Here, we identify a novel target that may serve not only for ovarian cancer treatment but also for sensitization of patients to chemotherapy. The cytotoxic effect of HSP60 monoclonal antibody and its synergism with chemotherapeutic agents highlight HSP60 as a promising target for therapy and chemosensitization in ovarian cancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berek JS, Bertelsen K, du Bois A, et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer (advanced stage): consensus conference (1998). Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite. 2000;28(7–8):576–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Mizuno M, et al. Survival benefit of taxane plus platinum in recurrent ovarian cancer with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histology. J Gynecol Oncol. 2014;25(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.1.43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jelovac D, Armstrong DK. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(3):183–203. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ling K-S, Chen G-D, Tsai H-J, et al. Mechanisms involved in chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Ecol. 2005;44(3):209–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60143-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig EA. Chaperones: helpers along the pathways to protein folding. Science. 1993;260(5116):1902–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh JC, Dohi T, Kang BH, et al. Hsp60 regulation of tumor cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(8):5188–94. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M705904200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saini J, Sharma PK. Clinical, prognostic and therapeutic significance of heat shock proteins in cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450118666170823121248.

  8. Ciocca DR, Calderwood SK. Heat shock proteins in cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2005;10(2):86–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jolly C, Morimoto RI. Role of the heat shock response and molecular chaperones in oncogenesis and cell death. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(19):1564–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cappello F, Conway de Macario E, Marasa L, et al. Hsp60 expression, new locations, functions and perspectives for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7(6):801–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hjerpe E, Egyhazi S, Carlson J, et al. HSP60 predicts survival in advanced serous ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(3):448–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318284308b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu-Hadid M, Wilkes JD, Elakawi Z, et al. Relationship between heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) mRNA expression and resistance to platinum analogues in human ovarian and bladder carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 1997;119(1):63–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Godwin AK, Meister A, O'Dwyer PJ, et al. High resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian cancer cell lines is associated with marked increase of glutathione synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(7):3070–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamendola DE, Duan Z, Yusuf RZ, et al. Molecular description of evolving paclitaxel resistance in the SKOV-3 human ovarian carcinoma cell line. Cancer Res. 2003;63(9):2200–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Macario AJ, Conway de Macario E. Molecular chaperones: multiple functions, pathologies, and potential applications. Front Biosci. 2007;12:2588–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatterjee S, Burns TF. Targeting heat shock proteins in cancer: a promising therapeutic approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2017:18(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091978.

  17. Wang X, Chen M, Zhou J, et al. HSP27, 70 and 90, anti-apoptotic proteins, in clinical cancer therapy (review). Int J Oncol. 2014;45(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hwang YJ, Lee SP, Kim SY, et al. Expression of heat shock protein 60 kDa is upregulated in cervical cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(3):399–406. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Castilla C, Congregado B, Conde JM, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of Hsp60 correlates with tumor progression and hormone resistance in prostate cancer. Urology. 2010;76(4):1017 e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamelin C, Cornut E, Poirier F, et al. Identification and verification of heat shock protein 60 as a potential serum marker for colorectal cancer. FEBS J. 2011;278(24):4845–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08385.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Giaginis C, Daskalopoulou SS, Vgenopoulou S, et al. Heat Shock Protein-27, -60 and -90 expression in gastric cancer: association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-9-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Desmetz C, Bibeau F, Boissiere F, et al. Proteomics-based identification of HSP60 as a tumor-associated antigen in early stage breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(9):3830–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr800130d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdalla MA, Haj-Ahmad Y. Promising urinary protein biomarkers for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma among high-risk hepatitis C virus Egyptian patients. J Cancer. 2012;3:390–403. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.4280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai YP, Yang MH, Huang CH, et al. Interaction between HSP60 and beta-catenin promotes metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(6):1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu H, Xiao F, Serebriiskii IG, et al. Network analysis identifies an HSP90-central hub susceptible in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(18):5053–67. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Oldham RK, Dillman RO. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy: 25 years of progress. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(11):1774–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellati F, Napoletano C, Gasparri ML, et al. Monoclonal antibodies in gynecological cancer: a critical point of view. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:890758. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/890758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Samaranayake H, Wirth T, Schenkwein D, et al. Challenges in monoclonal antibody-based therapies. Ann Med. 2009;41(5):322–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890802698842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marqus S, Pirogova E, Piva TJ. Evaluation of the use of therapeutic peptides for cancer treatment. J Biomed Sci. 2017;24(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-017-0328-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghassan M. Saed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

1. Heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) is overexpressed in chemoresistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

2. Targeting EOC cells with HSP60 monoclonal antibody induces cytotoxicity.

3. Combining chemotherapy with HSP60 monoclonal antibody causes synergistic killing of EOC cells.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harper, A.K., Fletcher, N.M., Fan, R. et al. Heat Shock Protein 60 (HSP60) Serves as a Potential Target for the Sensitization of Chemoresistant Ovarian Cancer Cells. Reprod. Sci. 27, 1030–1036 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00089-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00089-2

Keywords

Navigation