Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal Central Blood Pressure Is Associated with Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery Dopplers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiovascular adaptations to pregnancy involve physiological mechanisms that increase cardiac output, decrease total vascular resistance, and decrease both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). These maternal hemodynamic changes modulate uteroplacental blood flow and fetal–placental Doppler indices. Our objective was to create maternal cardiac profiles of pregnant women using non-invasive measurements of central BP to identify changes in maternal–fetal hemodynamics as a surrogate to fetal status. This was a prospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies in a perinatal referral center between January and April 2018. Central BP was measured non-invasively using the BP+ device. The BP+ device is a supra-systolic oscillometric central BP device, which measures BP waveforms peripherally and calculates central BP. We compared various BP+ values for peripheral BP with central BP and stratified by gestational age. We investigated the correlations between peripheral BP, central BP, estimated fetal weight (EFW), and the pulsatility indices (PI) of Doppler velocimetry and demonstrate that both central systolic and diastolic BP correlated to peripheral systolic and diastolic BP. Linear regression analysis confirmed that central BP predicts the middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI. The MCA PI correlated with EFW, specifically higher central systolic BP is associated with a lower MCA PI, implying a possible etiology of fetal brain shunting with poor placental perfusion. Future studies using predictors and markers of fetal outcomes from maternal cardiac parameters should consider maternal cardiovascular measurements to peripheral arterial BP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duvekot JJ, Peeters LLH. Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamic adaptation to pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994;49(12):S1–S14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christianson RE. Studies on blood pressure during pregnancy: I. Influence of parity and age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(4):509–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clapp JF 3rd, Capeless E. Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(11):1469–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Canobbio MM, Warnes CA, Aboulhosn J, et al. Management of pregnancy in patients with complex congenital heart disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(8):e50–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Naeye RL. Maternal blood pressure and fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141(7):780–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim WY, Lee YS, Tan CS, et al. The association between maternal blood pressures and offspring size at birth in Southeast Asian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szczepaniak-Chichel L, Markwitz W, Tykarski A. Difference between central and peripheral blood pressure in healthy and hypertension-complicated pregnancy. Blood Press Monit. 2016;21(2):103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Easterling TR, Benedetti TJ, Carlson KC, Brateng DA, Wilson J, Schmucker BS. The effect of maternal hemodynamics on fetal growth in hypertensive pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):902–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasapollo B, Valensise H, Novelli GP, Larciprete G, di Pierro G, Altomare F, et al. Abnormal maternal cardiac function and morphology in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(5):452–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomsin K, Mesens T, Molenberghs G, Peeters L, Gyselaers W. Characteristics of heart, arteries, and veins in low and high cardiac output preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;169(2):218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrazzi E, Stampalija T, Monasta L, Di Martino D, Vonck S, Gyselaers W. Maternal hemodynamics: a method to classify hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):124.e121–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Galloway JM, Ali T, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007;50(1):197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, Okin PM, Lee ET, Wang W, et al. High central pulse pressure is independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome the strong heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(18):1730–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McGee WT, Mailloux P, Jodka P, Thomas J. The pulmonary artery catheter in critical care. Semin Dial. 2006;19(6):480–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Climie RE, Schultz MG, Nikolic SB, Ahuja KD, Fell JW, Sharman JE. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25(4):414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe A, Harrison W, El-Aklouk E, Ruygrok P, Al-Jumaily AM. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms. J Biomech. 2009;42(13):2111–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin AC, Lowe A, Sidhu K, Harrison W, Ruygrok P, Stewart R. Evaluation of a novel sphygmomanometer, which estimates central aortic blood pressure from analysis of brachial artery suprasystolic pressure waves. J Hypertens. 2012;30(9):1743–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts LA, Ling HZ, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH, Kametas NA. Maternal hemodynamics, fetal biometry and Doppler indices in pregnancies followed up for suspected fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(4):507–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujime M, Tomimatsu T, Okaue Y, Koyama S, Kanagawa T, Taniguchi T, et al. Central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index during normal pregnancy. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(6):633–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spasojevic M, Smith SA, Morris JM, Gallery ED. Peripheral arterial pulse wave analysis in women with pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. Bjog. 2005;112(11):1475–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Poiati JR, Peracoli JC, Magalhaes CG, Costa RA, Oliveira AP, Borges VT. OS097. Hemodynamic assesment by applanation tonometry in women with early and late preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012;2(3):231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yalda Afshar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woods, A., Afshar, Y., Yin, O. et al. Maternal Central Blood Pressure Is Associated with Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery Dopplers. Reprod. Sci. 27, 655–661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00069-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00069-6

Keywords

Navigation