Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diet and trophic structure of frugivorous bats (Phyllostomidae) in forests and chagras of the Andean–Amazon piedmont, Ecuador

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecuador is experiencing a rapid conversion of its natural habitats, especially in its Andean–Amazon piedmont forests, a conversion that in turn threatens the country’s biodiversity. Frugivorous bats (Phyllostomidae) are not only an example of a taxa affected by habitat loss but may also play a role in overturning habitat loss and degradation. As important seed dispersers, bats are key to many ecological processes such as forest regeneration and succession. To understand Phyllostomidae diversity and trophic structure of Ecuador’s piedmont forests, as well as the potential role of bats in forest recovery through seed dispersal, we sampled bats at both agroforestry (chagras) sites and patches of secondary forest in the buffer zone of the Colonso Chalupas Biological Reserve, Napo Province (750–900 m asl.). For 4 months, we used mist nets and seed traps to sample bats and the seeds they carried. In total, these efforts yielded 224 bats belonging to 33 species. We captured 224 bats belonging to 33 species of which 114 individuals from 24 species transported seeds. We captured more species but fewer individuals of bats in forests (17) than in chagras (15). The bats carried 15,685 seeds of 41 different morpho-seeds belonging to twelve plant genera, with Piper, Cecropia, and Solanum being those with the highest number of seeds. The main disperser we found was Carollia brevicauda, both in the forest (index value = 1.4) and in chagras (2.2). Bat-plant networks were more symmetric in forests (− 1.63) compared to chagras (− 9.28) and showed higher degrees of specialization in chagras. Our results show the great diversity of bats and the seeds they carry and highlight how this traditional agricultural system allows for connectivity between forest patches by providing food niches for seed dispersers. Therefore, we argue both bats and chagras must be considered in forest restoration programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets we generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the owners of chagras in the buffer zone Libio Grefa, Lulu Grefa, Fermin Grefa, Klever Grefa y Norma Shiguango. We also thank John White for the English review and especially to Dr. Brock Fenton, Yntze van der Hoek, and an anonymous reviewer for the insightful comments that improved this manuscript. Captures and collections were done with the authorization of the Ministry of the Environment with research permit No. 20-19-IC-FAU/FLO-DPAN/MA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH, NMR, MCP: Study conception and design; MH, NMR: Acquisition of data; MH, MCP: Analysis and interpretation of data: MCP, MH: Drafting of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Peñuela.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling editor: Danilo Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hinojosa, M., Méndez-Romero, N. & Peñuela, M.C. Diet and trophic structure of frugivorous bats (Phyllostomidae) in forests and chagras of the Andean–Amazon piedmont, Ecuador. Mamm Biol 101, 481–495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00144-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00144-z

Keywords

Navigation