Skip to main content

Breast Cancer Detection and Classification from Mammogram Images Using Multi-model Shape Features

Abstract

Nowadays, breast cancer has become one of the common diseases and is leading in causes of deaths in women. Early detection of breast cancer is very much needed and critical, and mammography is considered as one of the best-suited procedures. The masses are classified as benign or malignant tumors. The size and shape of the masses are characterized by its shapes as per BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System), which can discriminate benign and malignant effectively. In this paper, we propose a framework that automatically classifies the benign and malignant tumors in mammogram images. We have considered INBreast and CBIS-DDSM dataset experiments. The histogram-processing multi-level Otsu thresholding on the extracted Region of Interest (ROI) is applied as pre-processing steps for segmenting it. Eighteen features are extracted from the ROI and characterized structure, shape, size, and boundaries of mass present in images belong to both the datasets. The features extracted from the datasets are cross-validated for training and testing using stratified cross-validation techniques. The support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers are trained and validated for benign and malignant tumor classification. The experimental results have achieved good results and are promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Availability of Data and Materials

The breast dataset used in this paper is benchmark dataset publicly available for research. Thus, the ethics is followed.

References

  1. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/20-Breast-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed Dec 2020

  2. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2022

  3. Johns PC, Yaffe MJ. X-ray characterization of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1987;32(6):675–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dheeba J, Singh NA, Selvi ST. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach. J Biomed Inform. 2014;49:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Appleton CM, Berg WA, Burnside ES. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013. p. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sampat M, Bovik A, Markey M. Classification of mammographic lesions into BI-RADS (TM) shape categories using the Beamlet transform. Proceedings of SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2005. p. 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.596563.

  7. Cascio DONATO, Fauci F, Magro R, Raso G, Bellotti R, De Carlo F, Torres EL. Mammogram segmentation by contour searching and mass lesions classification with neural network. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53(5):2827–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mu T, Nandi AK, Rangayyan RM. Classification of breast masses using selected shape, edge-sharpness, and texture features with linear and kernel-based classifiers. J Digit Imaging. 2007;21(2):153–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pal NR, Bhowmick B, Patel SK, Pal S, Das J. A multi-stage neural network aided system for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Neurocomputing. 2008;71(13–15):2625–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Surendiran B, Vadivel A. Mammogram mass classification using various geometric shape and margin features for early detection of breast cancer. Int J Med Eng Inf. 2012;4(1):36–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vadivel A, Surendiran B. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43(4):259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayer T, Chen Q, Burnside ES. Artificial neural networks in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision making. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:1–10.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh B, Jain VK, Singh S. Mammogram mass classification using support vector machine with texture, shape features and hierarchical centroid method. J Med Imaging Health Inf. 2014;4(5):687–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumbaly R, Vishnusri N, Jeyalatha S. Diagnosis of breast cancer using decision tree data mining technique. Int J Comput Appl. 2014;98(10):16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patel BC, Sinha GR. Mammography feature analysis and mass detection in breast cancer images. In 2014 International Conference on Electronic Systems, Signal Processing and Computing Technologies. 2014. p. 474–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC.2014.89.

  16. Jen CC, Yu SS. Automatic detection of abnormal mammograms in mammographic images. Expert Syst Appl. 2015;42(6):3048–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh AK, Gupta B. A novel approach for breast cancer detection and segmentation in a mammogram. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;54:676–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rouhi R, Jafari M, Kasaei S, Keshavarzian P. Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and CNN segmentation. Expert Syst Appl. 2015;42(3):990–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mert A, Kılıç N, Bilgili E, Akan A. Breast cancer detection with reduced feature set. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Král P, Lenc L. “LBP features for breast cancer detection,” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2016. p. 2643–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532838.

  21. Rastghalam R, Pourghassem H. Breast cancer detection using MRF-based probable texture feature and decision-level fusion-based classification using HMM on thermography images. Pattern Recogn. 2016;51:176–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Swiderski B, Osowski S, Kurek J, Kruk M, Lugowska I, Rutkowski P, Barhoumi W. Novel methods of image description and ensemble of classifiers in application to mammogram analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;81:67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giri P, Saravanakumar K. Breast cancer detection using image processing techniques. Orient J Comput Sci Technol. 2017;10(2):391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang Z, Xu W, Chen S (2017) Classification of benign and malignant breast cancer based on DWI texture features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Intelligence. Association for Computing Machinery, New York. p. 11–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3135954.3135964

  25. Sonar P, Bhosle U, Choudhury C. “Mammography classification using modified hybrid SVM-KNN” 2017 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSPC). 2017. p. 305–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPC.2017.8305858.

  26. Wang H, Feng J, Bu Q, Liu F, Zhang M, Ren Y, Lv Y. Breast mass detection in digital mammogram based on gestalt psychology. J Healthc Eng. 2018;2018:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Punitha S, Amuthan A, Joseph KS. Benign and malignant breast cancer segmentation using optimized region growing technique. Futur Comput Inf J. 2018;3(2):348–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abiyev RH, Helwan A. Fuzzy neural networks for identification of breast cancer using images’ shape and texture features. J Med Imaging Health Inf. 2018;8(4):817–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matos CEF, Souza JC, Diniz JOB, Junior GB, de Paiva AC, de Almeida JDS, Silva AC. Diagnosis of breast tissue in mammography images based local feature descriptors. Multimed Tools Appl. 2019;78(10):12961–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ray R, Abdullah AA, Mallick DK, Dash SR. Classification of benign and malignant breast cancer using supervised machine learning algorithms based on image and numeric datasets. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1372(1):012062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zebari DA, Ibrahim DA, Zeebaree DQ, Mohammed MA, Haron H, Zebari NA, Maskeliūnas R. Breast cancer detection using mammogram images with improved multi-fractal dimension approach and feature fusion. Appl Sci. 2021;11(24):12122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vaka AR, Soni B, Reddy S. Breast cancer detection by leveraging Machine Learning. ICT Expr. 2020;6(4):320–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, Shetty S. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang H, Wu R, Yuan T, Jiang Z, Huang S, Wu J, Ji D. DE-Ada*: a novel model for breast mass classification using cross-modal pathological semantic mining and organic integration of multi-feature fusions. Inf Sci. 2020;539:461–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohanty F, Rup S, Dash B, Majhi B, Swamy MNS. Mammogram classification using contourlet features with forest optimization-based feature selection approach. Multimed Tools Appl. 2019;78(10):12805–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohamed BA, Salem NM “Automatic classification of masses from digital mammograms.” 2018 35th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC). 2018. p. 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.2018.8354408.

  37. Pashoutan S, Baradaran Shokouhi S, Pashoutan M. “Automatic Breast Tumor Classification Using a Level Set Method and Feature Extraction in Mammography.” 2017 24th National and 2nd International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME). 2017. p. 1–6, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBME.2017.8430285.

  38. Huang ML, Lin TY. Dataset of breast mammography images with masses. Data Brief. 2020;31: 105928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee RS, Gimenez F, Hoogi A, Miyake KK, Gorovoy M, Rubin DL. A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research. Sci Data. 2017;4(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Uthoff J, Sieren JC. “Information theory optimization based feature selection in breast mammography lesion classification.” 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018). 2018. p. 817–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363697.

  41. Ghongade RD, Wakde DG. “Detection and classification of breast cancer from digital mammograms using RF and RF-ELM algorithm.” 2017 1st International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering and Nano-Technology (IEMENTech). 2017. p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMENTECH.2017.8076982.

  42. Sarosa SJA, Utaminingrum F, Bachtiar FA. “Mammogram breast cancer classification using gray-level co-occurrence matrix and support vector machine.” 2018 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET). 2018. p. 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIET.2018.8693146.

  43. Loizidou K, Skouroumouni G, Nikolaou C, Pitris C. “Breast mass detection and classification algorithm based on temporal subtraction of sequential mammograms.” 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2021. p. 1117–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9433802.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge our universities for providing opportunity to carry out this research.

Funding

No funding agency has sponsored this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The research is outcome of the research work among all the authors. The first author is a research scholar working under the second author. Th third corresponding author is leader of the research group.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Vadivel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We do not have any competing interests as far as this paper is concerned.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Predictive Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security and Privacy” guest edited by Hardik A. Gohel, S. Margret Anouncia and Anthoniraj Amalanathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurudas, V.R., Shaila, S.G. & Vadivel, A. Breast Cancer Detection and Classification from Mammogram Images Using Multi-model Shape Features. SN COMPUT. SCI. 3, 404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01290-y

Keywords

  • Mammogram
  • Breast cancer
  • Benign
  • Malignant
  • Tumor
  • Size
  • Shape
  • Mass
  • Classification