Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in Judo Attack Systems Between Weight Categories

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In judo, athletes compete based on weight categories, which are required to adapt the training process accordingly, but not enough research is present to understand their particularities. The present study aimed to verify the differences in judo attack systems performed between the seven male weight categories in world-class athletes.

Methods

A cohort of 5847 attack systems from 1106 international judo matches was analyzed. The Chi-square automatic interaction detector was used to identify the association between the variables tori approach (attacker), uke approach (defender), tori’s grip, stance and direction of attack.

Results

The main results showed that: (1) the grip is the main predictor of attack systems; (2) laterality exerts a strong influence on attack systems; (3) the ≤ 81 kg and > 100 kg categories were differentiated by the use of unconventional grips; (4) the ≤ 60 kg used more kenka-yotsu (opposite sides) right stance with the Only Right Hand grip; (5) the ≤ 81 kg category used more the ai-yotsu (same side) left stance with the Only Left Hand grip.

Conclusion

The results reported from this study can help coaches and athletes in choosing the best technical–tactical actions when developing combat strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors declare that there is no availability of data.

References

  1. Agostinho MF, Franchini E. Observational analysis of the variability of actions in judo: the key for success? Rev Artes Marciales Asiáticas. 2021;15(2):69–77. https://doi.org/10.18002/rama.v15i2.6341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balcı Ş, Ceylan B. Penalties in judo: the impact of shido on match durations and results. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2020;20(4):659–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2020.1775413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barreto LBM, Dal Bello F, Araujo RA, Brito CJ, Fernandes JR, Miarka B. Judo approach and handgrip analysis: determining aspects of world circuit high performance. J Phys Educ Sport. 2019;19:413–9. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boguszewski D, Adamczyk J, Boguszewska K, Siewierski M, Białoszewski WB. The attractiveness of judo contests as a sports entertainment. Arch Budo Sci Martial Arts Extreme Sports. 2014;10:31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brito CJ, Moreira DG, Fernandes JR, Ferreira AP, Córdova C, da Silva RAS, Miarka B. Technical-tactical comparisons between weight divisions in elite judo athletes. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Do Desporto. 2017;17(S4A):49–67. https://doi.org/10.5628/rpcd.17.s4a.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calmet M, Miarka B, Franchini E. Modeling of grasps in judo contests. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2010;10(3):229–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2010.11868518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calmet M, Pierantozzi E, Sterkowicz S, Challis B, Franchini E. Rule change and Olympic judo scores, penalties and match duration. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(4):458–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1350489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calmet M, Pierantozzi E, Sterkowicz S, Takito MY, Franchini E. Judo rules: searching for a wind of changes. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2017;17(6):863–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2017.1405612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Courel-Ibáñez J, Franchini E, Femia P, Stankovic N, Escobar-Molina R. Effects of kumi-kata grip laterality and throwing side on attack effectiveness and combat result in elite judo athletes. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2014;14(1):138–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Camargo RG, Guerra GM, Rosa RL, Calmet M, Takito MY, Franchini E. Attack side and direction during the 2017 Judo World Championship. Sport Sci Health. 2019;15(2):477–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-019-00540-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dopico-Calvo X, Iglesias-Soler E, Morenilla L, Giráldez MA, Santos L, Ardá A. Laterality and performance in combat sports. Arch Budo. 2017;12:167–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Escobar-Molina R, Courel-Ibáñez J, Franchini E, Femia P, Stankovic NJ. The impact of penalties on subsequent attack effectiveness and combat outcome among high elite judo competitors. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2014;14(3):946–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franchini E, Del Vecchio FB, Matsushigue KA, Artioli GG. Physiological profiles of elite judo athletes. Sports Med. 2011;41(2):147–66. https://doi.org/10.2165/11538580-000000000-00000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Franchini E, Artioli GG, Brito CJ. Judo combat: time-motion analysis and physiology. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2013;13(3):624–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchini E, de Moura CFD, Shiroma SA, Humberstone C, Julio UF. Pacing in judo: analysis of international-level competitions with different durations. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2019;19(1):121–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2019.1570458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritz C, Morris P, Richler J. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). 2022. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/overlapping-publications.html. Accessed 1 June 2022.

  19. International Judo Federation. Sports and organization rules of the international judo federation. 2010. https://www.ijf.org/ijf/documents/22. Accessed 1 June 2022.

  20. International Judo Federation. Sports and organization rules of the international judo federation. 2019. https://www.ijf.org/ijf/documents/6. Accessed 1 June 2022.

  21. Ito K, Hirose N, Maekawa N. Characteristics of re-gripping techniques preceding scored throws in international-level judo competition. Cent Eur J Sport Sci Med. 2019;25(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.18276/cej.2019.1-05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kashiwagura DB, Courel-Ibáñez J, Kashiwagura FB, Agostinho MF, Franchini E. Judo technical-tactical dynamics: analysis of attack system effectiveness in high-level athletes. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2021;21(6):922–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2021.1958533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kashiwagura DB, Kashiwagura FB, Agostinho MF, Moraes ALG, Franchini E. Objectivity and reliability of the Judo Attack System Software. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371221088191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kass GV. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat. 1980;29(2):119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miarka B, Fukuda DH, Del Vecchio FB, Franchini E. Discriminant analysis of technical-tactical actions in high-level judo athletes. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2016;16(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soriano D, Irurtia A, Tarragó R, Tayot P, Milà-Villaroel R, Iglesias X. Time-motion analysis during elite judo combats (defragmenting the gripping time). Arch Budo. 2019;15:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sterkowicz-Przybycień K, Miarka B, Fukuda DH. Sex and weight category differences in time-motion analysis of elite judo athletes: implications for assessment and training. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(3):817–25. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Witkowski K, Superson M, Piepiora P. Body composition and motor potential of judo athletes in selected weight categories. Arch Budo. 2021;17:161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(20):2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the study. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation, revisions and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel Brandão Kashiwagura or Emerson Franchini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The project was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee of EEFE-USP (CEP/0120/EEFE/10062020).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashiwagura, D.B., Courel-Ibáñez, J., Kashiwagura, F.B. et al. Differences in Judo Attack Systems Between Weight Categories. J. of SCI. IN SPORT AND EXERCISE 5, 263–273 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-022-00179-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-022-00179-9

Keywords

Navigation