Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Productivity of rainfed maize as influenced by hydrogel and mulching under conventional and zero tillage in maize–wheat cropping system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An agronomy field experiment was conducted at Ram Dhan Singh Seed Farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, at 29°47' N latitude and 75°47′ E longitude in a semi-arid climate having loamy sand soil during two successive years to compare the efficacy of different levels of hydrogel and mulch application along with conventional and zero tillage in maize cultivation under rainfed conditions. The maize hybrid cultivar HQPM 10 was tested under three levels of hydrogel (control, 2.5 and 5.0 kg/ha), two levels of crop cultivation (conventional and zero tillage) and two levels of moisture conservation (control and residue/mulch). Zero tillage, residue retention/mulching and hydrogel application increased soil moisture retention capacity, crop maturity, plant height, grain yield, stover yield and water productivity in rainfed maize. Zero tillage produced significantly higher grain yield (5466 and 5339 kg/ha) as compared to conventional tillage (4041 and 4103 kg/ha) There was significant increase in grain yield due to residue retention/mulching 4.0 t/ha (5058 and 5082 kg/ha) than no mulching (4449 and 4360 kg/ha). Among all hydrogel levels, application of hydrogel 5.0 kg/ha recorded the maximum grain yield in rainfed maize (4921 and 4951 kg/ha) being significantly higher than control (4544 and 4506 kg/ha).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Arya RK, Yadav HP, Yadav AK, Singh MK (2010) Effect of environment on yield and its contributing traits in pearl millet. Forage Res 36:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya RK, Singh MK, Yadav AK, Kumar A, Kumar S (2014) Advances in pearl millet to mitigate adverse environment conditions emerged due to global warming. Forage Res 40:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya RK, Kamboj MC, Kumar S (2020) Evaluation of new extra-early maturing hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) for grain yield and contributing traits under humid and semi-arid conditions of Haryana. Ekin J 6:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya RK, Kamboj MC, Kumar S (2021) Screening of medium-late maturing maize hybrids under humid and semi-arid climatic conditions of Haryana. Forage Res 47:167–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DC, Evans RY (1991) Calcium inhibition of polyacrylamide gel hydration is partially reversible by potassium. HorticSci 26:1063–1065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Changela Y, Bhatt DS, Tandel BM, Bhatt ST, Patel HM (2022) Prospective of hydrogel for ornamental plants. Pharma Innov 11:1343–1347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dar SB, Ram H (2016) Growth analysis, micro-climatic parameters and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in relation to hydrogel under different irrigation regimes and nutrient levels. J Wheat Res 8:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Dridiger VK, Gadzhiumarov RG (2021) Soil density, soil moisture content and maize yield using No-till technology of cultivation. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 843:012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/843/1/012023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalhapure A, Kumar R, Singh VP, Pandey DS (2016) Hydrogels: a boon for increasing agriculturalproductivity in water-stressed environment. Current Sci 111:1773–1779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karki TB, Shrestha J (2014) Maize production under no-tillage system in Nepal. World J Agric Res 2(6A):13–17. https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-6A-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karki TB, Gadal N, Shrestha J (2014) Studies on the conservation agriculture based practices under maize (Zea mays L.) based system in the hills of Nepal. Int J Appl Sci 2:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasal YG, Bhowmik S, Shete PP, Dahiphale PA (2020) Effect of irrigation scheduling, mulching and hydrogel on maize crop. Eur J Mol Clin Med 7:2638–2645

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MAH, Parvej MR (2010) Impact of conservation tillage under organic mulches on the reproductive efficacy and yield of Quality Protein Maize. J Agric Sci 5:52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B, Srivastava S, Kaur H, Yadava P, Jat SL, Parihar CM, Singh AK, Tiwari T, Kumar V, Varma S, Kaul J (2016) Research Communication Hydro and aeroponic technique for rapid drought tolerance screening in maize (Zea mays). Indian J Agron 61:509–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Meena RS, Singh S, Meena VS (2022) Hydrogel: A role in agriculture undermoisture stress condition. Vigyan Varta 3:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RS, Bridgt TK, Chanchala A (2018) Physical and chemical properties of sandy soils as influenced by the application of hydrogel and mulching in Maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7:3612–3618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari S, Solanki NS, Dashora LN, Upadhyay B (2017) Effect of super absorbent polymer and plant geometry on growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6:179–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Li Q, Pan L (2021) Review of organic mulching effects on soil and water loss. Ach Agron Soil Sci 67:136–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazen AM, Radwanab DEM, Ahmedac AF (2015) Growth responses of maize plants cultivated in sandy soil amended by different superabsorbant hydrogels. J Plant Nutr 38:325–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen G, Efrem G (2020) Hydrogel: a promising technology for optimization of nutrients and water in agricultural and forest ecosystems. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour 23:556116

    Google Scholar 

  • Monneveux P, Quillérou E, Sanchez C, Lopez-Cesati J (2006) Effect of zero tillage and residues conservation on continuous maize cropping in a subtropical environment (Mexico). Plant Soil 279:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0436-3

  • Raghavendra M, Singh YV, Das TK, Meena MC (2017) Effect of crop residue and potassium management practices on productivity and economics of conservation agriculture based maize (Zeamays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 87:855–861

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumara S, Gundlur SS, Neelakanth JK, Ashoka P (2014) Impact of irrigation and crop residue management on maize (Zea mays)–chickpea (Cicer arietinum) sequence under no tillage conditions. Indian J Agric Sci 84:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Ahmad R, Safdar M (2011) Effect of hydrogel on the performance of aerobic rice sown under different techniques. Plant Soil Environ 57:321–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy T, Kumar S, Chand L, Kadam DM, Bihari B, Shrimali SS, Bishnoi R, Maurya UK, Singh M, Muruganandam M, Singh L, Sharma SK, Kumar R, Mallik A (2019) Impact of Pusa hydrogel application on yield and productivity of rainfed wheat in North West Himalayan region. Curr Sci 116:1246–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saini AK, Malve SH (2022) Impact of hydrogel on agriculture—a review. Ecol Environ Conserv 29(Special Issue):S36–S47.

  • Sandoval AP, Yáñez-Chávez LG, Sánchez-Cohen I, Samaniego-Gaxiola JA, Trejo-Calzada R (2017) Hydrogel, biocompost and its effect on photosynthetic activity and production of forage maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Acta Agron 66:63–68. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n1.50868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattar A, Sher A, Ijaz M (2020) Interactive effect of biochar and silicon on improving morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes of maize by reducing drought hazards. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20:1819–1826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00253-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Punia MS, Kamboj MC (2016) Association analysis of yield and quality attributes in maize. Forage Res 42:204–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS (1998) Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. In: Hooda DS, Hasija RC (eds) Recent advances in information theory, statistics & computer applications by department of mathematics statistics. CCS HAU, Hisar, pp 139–143

  • Shivakumar R, Bridgit TK, Retheesh PK (2019) Effect of hydrogel and mulching on yield, yield attributes and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) in sandy soil. Int J Chem Stud 6:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Singh NP (1977) Monograph 4. Water Technology Centre, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi

  • Tyagi S, Garg AP, Naresh RK, Tyagi A, Mahajan NC (2019) Hydrogel: a water wise paradigm. In: Research trends in multidisciplinary research, vol 9. AkiNik Publications, New Delhi, pp 123–151

  • Vanderlip RL (1972) How a sorghum plant develops. Kansas State University, Co-operative. Experimental Services Report C-447

  • Wei T, Zhang P, Wang K, Ding R, Yang B, Nie J (2015) Effects of wheat straw Incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in semi-arid areas. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0120994

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani F, Allahdadi I, Akbari GA (2007) Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pak J Biol Sci 10:4190–4196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Qian Y, Cao C (2015) Effects of straw mulching on maize photosynthetic characteristics and rhizosphere soil micro-ecological environment. Chil J Agric Res 75(4):481–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Director, ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research for providing opportunity to conduct maize trail and financial assistance for the same and also thankful to Regional Director, CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal and Director, RDS Seed Farm, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, for providing field trial facilities for the investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India

    Suresh Kumar

  2. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India

    Rajesh Kumar Arya & Satpal Singh

  3. CCS HAU Regional Research Station, Uchani, Karnal, Haryana, 132001, India

    Narender Singh

Authors
  1. Suresh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajesh Kumar Arya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narender Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Satpal Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SK and RKA conceived the idea, conducted the field experiment and wrote the manuscript. NS and S performed the analysis and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Kumar Arya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by János Pauk.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Arya, R.K., Singh, N. et al. Productivity of rainfed maize as influenced by hydrogel and mulching under conventional and zero tillage in maize–wheat cropping system. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 52, 885–898 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-023-00407-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-023-00407-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation