Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of agriculture land use on standard cellulosic substrates breakdown and invertebrates’ community

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ensuring the effectiveness of method in maintaining and recovering the productive capacity of degraded soils, e.g., no-till farming, is more important than opening new agricultural frontiers. Organic matter breakdown is a key ecosystem process with implications on aquatic food webs and biogeochemical cycles. Our objective was to quantify the standard cellulosic substrate (cotton strips and balsa wood) mass loss in no-till soybean and forest areas as control. We use bags of two mesh sizes (0.5 mm vs. 10 mm), on soil surface and buried-in-soil (10 cm) for 30, 70, and 90 days in all three sampling sites: no-till soybean vs. adjacent forest vs. forest native. The invertebrate community by pitfall collector and soil for chemical characterization was also sampled. The high microbial breakdown of balsa wood buried-in-soil was observed in no-till soybean systems (± 5% compared to forest), indicating a superficial fertilizing effect and negative effect to decomposers. The mass loss in balsa wood in soil surface ranges from 15% (fine mesh in the adjacent forest) to 25% smaller (fine mesh in no-till soybean systems) compared to forest native. Microbial breakdown in cotton buried was 45% greater in no-till soybean systems compared to forest native. The cotton breakdown by invertebrate activity on soil surface was higher in the forest areas compared to no-till soybean (30% smaller) due to the quality and edaphic conditions of the adjacent litter. Finally, adjacent forest close to crops may provide important ecosystem services for productive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. All data are available on paper.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

RSR is grateful to National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Chico Mendes Institute for Conservation of Biodiversity (ICMBio) in projects number 403945/2021-6. We thank the support from the Foundation to Support the Research and Innovation of State of Santa Catarina (FAPESC; TO 2021TR001802) and the Community University of the Chapecó Region (LabEntEco).

Funding

This study was funded by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Chico Mendes Institute for Conservation of Biodiversity (ICMBio).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RR and CB conceived the study. BV, AP, EH, and ES collected field data and performed the chemical analyses. RR managed and analyzed the data. RR wrote the manuscript with feedback from CB, BV, AP, EH, and ES authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renan de Souza Rezende.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Ethics approval

We confirm that this manuscript complies with all Ethical Rules applicable for journal.

Consent to participate

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Consent for publication

All authors approved this manuscript for publication, if accepted.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cavallet, B.V., Silva, E.R., Baretta, C.R.D.M. et al. Effect of agriculture land use on standard cellulosic substrates breakdown and invertebrates’ community. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 23, 277–288 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-022-00103-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-022-00103-9

Keywords

Navigation