Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indirect facilitation mediated by pollinators in intermountain prairie

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollinators can drive indirect facilitative and competitive indirect interactions among plant species. Most work on indirect facilitation via pollinators has focused on “magnet species” which enhance the pollination success of their neighbors because they are disproportionately attractive. However, focusing on magnet species may overestimate the generality of indirect facilitation and underestimate the occurrence of indirect competition among plant species via pollinators. We used experimental arrangements that included three flowering native intermountain prairie species (Achillea millefolium, Gaillardia aristata, and Linum lewisii), all of which are similarly attractive to pollinators, to explore how variation in species richness and density affected pollinator visitation rates, diversity, and behavior. All three plant species experienced significant increases in pollinator visitation and the species richness of visiting pollinator communities when grown with another species that was in flower at the same time. This “diversity” effect was stronger than the effects of the total density of individual plants in flower in a plot. We also found an increase in visitation time, per flower, for solitary pollinator species in plots with two species in flower compared to plots with one plant species in flower. Social pollinator species did not increase visitation time in two-species plots. Finally, seed set by Linum was significantly greater in two-species than in one-species plots. Our results indicate that indirect facilitative interactions mediated by pollinators may be common in intermountain prairie plant communities and that such indirect interactions do not have to mediated by benefactor species that are strikingly more attractive than their beneficiaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data will be available at https://www.mtnsfepscor.org/.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D., & Le Conte, T. (2010). Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. tp://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/01/18/rsbl.2009.0986.short.

  • Albor, C., García-Franco, J. G., Parra-Tabla, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C., & Arceo-Gómez, G. (2019). Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co-flowering community differentially affect Cakile edentula pollination at different spatial scales. Journal of Ecology, 107, 2167–2181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13183

  • Albrecht, M., Ramis, M. R., & Traveset, A. (2016). Pollinator-mediated impacts of alien invasive plantson the pollination of native plants: The role of spatial scale and distinct behaviour among pollinator guilds. Biological Invasions, 18, 1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1121-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, R. M., Gowda, V., & Zacharias, M. (2003). Butterfly pollination and high-contrast visual signalsin a low-density distylous plant. Oecologia, 136, 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1336-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, J., & Lortie, C. J. (2019). Finding the bees knees: A conceptual framework and systematicreview of the mechanisms of pollinator-mediated facilitation. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 36, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2018.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, M. F., & Breen, J. (1997). Seasonal variation in pollen and nectar sources of honey beesin Ireland. Journal of Apicultural Research, 36, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, E. (1975). Honey. A comprehensive survey. William Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, E. (1990). Bees and beekeeping: Science. William Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauber, J., Biesmeijer, J. C., Gabriel, D., Kunin, W. E., Lamborn, E., Meyer, B., & Settele, J. (2010). Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: A Pan-European approach. Journal of Ecology, 98, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01590.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filho, LC., & Packer, L. (2015). Revision of the Neotropical subgenera Coelioxys (Platycoelioxys) Mitchell and C. (Rhinocoelioxys) Mitchell (Hymenoptera; Megachilidae) with the description of one new species. Zootaxa, 3941(2), 151–203. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3941.2.1

  • De Groot, A. P. (1953). Protein and amino acid requirements of the honeybee. Physiologia Comparata Et Oecologia, 3, 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus, A., Klügl, F., Oechslein, C., Puppe, F., & Chittka, L. (2006). Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: Effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arj036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, T. S., Morris, W. F., & Wilson, W. G. (2004). When can two plant species facilitate each other’s pollination? Oikos, 105, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12845.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fort, H., Vázquez, D. P., & Lan, B. L. (2016). Abundance and generalisation in mutualistic networks: Solving the chicken-and-egg dilemma. Ecology Letters, 19, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galetto, L., & Bernardello, G. (2003). Nectar sugar composition in angiosperms from Chaco and Patagonia (Argentina): An animal visitor’s matter? Plant Systematics and Evolution, 238, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0269-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., Aizen, M. A., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S. A., & Bartomeus, I. (2013). Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339, 1608–1611. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul, J. (2006). Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. Journal of Ecology, 94, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson, D., Ollerton, J., & Sluman, C. (1997). Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: When to switch? Animal Behaviour, 53, 1009–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson, D. (1999). Foraging strategies of insects for gathering nectar and pollen, andimplications for plant ecology and evolution. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2, 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson, D. (2003). Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1976). Bumblebee foraging and the economics of sociality: How have bumblebeesevolved to use a large variety of flowers efficiently? American Scientist, 64, 384–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegland, S. J., & Boeke, L. (2006). Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resourcesand flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecological Entomology, 31, 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00812.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, E. W., Bickley, W. E., & Shimanuki, H. (1970). The brood-rearing capability of caged honeybees fed dandelion and mixed pollen diets. Journal of Economic Entomology, 63, 215–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingston, A. B., & McQuillan, P. B. (1998). Nectar robbing in Epacris impressa (Epacridaceae) by therecently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Apidae) in Tasmania. Victorian Naturalist, 115, 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten, O. L. A. (1988). Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology, 2, 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K., & Hubbell, S. P. (1974). Aggression and competition among stingless bees: Field studies. Ecology, 55, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., Peter, C. I., Nilsson, L. A., & Ågren, J. (2000). Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants. Ecology, 84, 2919–2927. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Romero, C., Seguí, J., Pérez-Delgado, A., Nogales, A., & Traveset, A. (2019). Beta diversity and specialization in plant–pollinator networks along an elevational gradient. Journal of Biogeography, 46, 1598–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13615

  • Laverty, T. M., & Plowright, R. C. (1988). Fruit and seed set in mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum): Influence of intraspecific factors and local enhancement near Pedicularis canadensis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 66, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1139/b88-027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverty, T. M. (1992). Plant interactions for pollinator visits: A test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia, 89, 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lázaro, A., Lundgren, R., & Totland, O. (2009). Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos, 118, 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17168.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., & Anderson, W. W. (1970). Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. The American Naturalist, 104, 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1086/282680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Luo, W., Peng, S., & Callaway, R. M. (2015). Plant diversity, soil biota and resistance to exotic invasion. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, R. P. (1974). Ecology of Bombinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Southern Ontario, with emphasis on their natural enemies and relationships with flowers. PhD, thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

  • Masters, J. A., & Emery, S. M. (2015). The showy invasive plant Ranunculus ficaria facilitates pollinator activity, pollen deposition, but not always seed production for two native spring ephemeral plants. Biological Invasions, 17, 2329–2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0878-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mevi-Schütz, J., & Erhardt, A. (2005). Amino acids in nectar enhance butterfly fecundity: A long-awaited link. The American Naturalist, 165, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1086/429150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, D. A. (2004). Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology, 85, 3289–3301. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Montenegro, M. A., Badano, E. I., & Cavieres, L. A. (2008). Positive interactions among plantspecies for pollinator service: Assessing the ‘magnet species’ concept with invasive species. Oikos, 117, 1833–1839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16896.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, A. A., & Cavieres, L. A. (2008). The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinatorservice and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. Journal of Ecology, 96, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01361.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamitsu, T., & Inoue, T. (1997). Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest. Oecologia, 110, 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieh, J. C., Contrera, F. A., Ramírez, S., & Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L. (2003). Variation in the ability to communicate three-dimensional resource location by stingless bees from different habitats. Animal Behaviour, 66, 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou, T., Van Laere, A., Ellis, W. N., & Smets, E. (2006). What shapes amino acid and sugarcomposition in Mediterranean floral nectars? Oikos, 115, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14487.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, W. J., Hill, G. R., & Clark, S. (1974). Seed production in a prairie legume (Astragalus canadensis L.). Oecologia, 17, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke, B. (1983). Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In L. Real (Ed.), Pollination biology (pp. 305–329). Academic Press Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke, B. (1988). Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology, 69, 446–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader, R. J. (1975). Competitive relationships of some bog ericads for major insectpollinators. Canadian Journal of Botany, 53, 1300–1305. https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W. (1981). Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology, 62, 946–954. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., & Baltus, M. S. (1987). Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology, 68, 1679–1690. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szczêsna, T. (2006). Protein content and amino acid composition of bee-collected pollen from selected botanical origins. Journal of Apicultural Science, 50, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, N., Hambäck, P. A., & Inoye, B. D. (2020). Pollinators, herbivores, and plant neighbourhood effects. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 95, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Plas, F. (2019). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biological Reviews, 94, 1220–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, D. P., & Aizen, M. A. (2003). Null model analyses of specialization in plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology, 84, 2493–2501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known bythe company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M., & Fugate, M. L. (1986). Pollen precedence and stigma closure: A mechanism ofcompetition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia, 70, 73–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N. M., & Tepedino, V. J. (2003). Consistent mixing of near and distant resources in foragingbouts by the solitary mason bee Osmia lignaria. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/14.1.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Z.-M., Dai, W.-K., Jin, X.-F., Gituru, R. W., Wang, Q. F., & Yang, C.-F. (2013). Competition and facilitation amongplants for pollination: Can pollinator abundance shift the plant–plant interactions? Plant Ecology, 215, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for assistance from Amber and Isabella Maccarone, and their unfailing support of SD and this research. This research was made possible by the generous donations of John and Dian Adams whose love of insect pollinators is surpassed only by their support of me and this research. RMC acknowledges support from NSF EPSCoR Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3) and NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement OIA-1757351.

Funding

John and Diane Adams donations; NSF EPSCoR Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3); NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement OIA-1757351.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biological Sciences and the Institute on Ecosystems, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA

    Scott Debnam & Ragan M. Callaway

  2. School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Huixuan Liao

Authors
  1. Scott Debnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huixuan Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ragan M. Callaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SD conceived of and developed the project, SD and RMC collected data, HL developed the common gardens and conducted statistics, and SD and RMC wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Debnam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary file 2 (XLSX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debnam, S., Liao, H. & Callaway, R.M. Indirect facilitation mediated by pollinators in intermountain prairie. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 22, 309–317 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-021-00056-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-021-00056-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation