Abstract
Historically, government workforce development programs have focused on younger individuals. The effectiveness of these programs for older workers aged 50 or older remains unclear. Therefore, this study examined the effect of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs in the state of Georgia on older workers. This study used WIOA performance data, including a total of 11,390 older workers between 2016 and 2020, and the American Community Survey (ACS) data. Descriptive analyses of two datasets examined participant demographics, training information, program participation outcomes, and older labor force characteristics in the state. WIOA programs were successful in serving two disadvantaged groups in employment, including older females and older Black participants. Despite a decrease in the number of older training participants over time, the most chosen training programs aligned with data on common occupations of the older workforce in the state. These programs improved the employability of older female participants but not for other disadvantaged older workers who were older in age or non-White individuals. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of addressing structural barriers to employment for older workers in employment transition, along with the improvement of the government workforce development programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A program year spans from July 1st of a previous year to June 30th of a coming year.
References
Achenbaum, W. A. (1991). Putting ADEA into historical context. Research on Aging, 13(4), 463–469. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=gnh&AN=53513&site=ehost-live&custid=uga1
Alcover, C. M. (2017). Bridge employment: transitions from career employment to retirement and beyond. In The Palgrave handbook of age diversity and work (pp. 225–262). Springer.
Bass, S. A., & Caro, F. G. (2001). Productive aging: a conceptual framework. In M. Hinterlong & H Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and Challenges (N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, & M. W. Sherraden (Eds.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bell, J. R. (2017). Older adult community service worker program for riverside county: community-based solutions for social service delivery. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1952989309?accountid=14537&bdid=6734&_bd=OQx1mkxkFwzs2sewjuYg71nB8Pg%3D
Bradley, D. H. (2015). The workforce innovation and opportunity act and the one-stop delivery system. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44252.pdf
Butler, R. N., & Gleason, H. P. (1985). Productive aging. Springer Pub. Co.
Cajner, T., Radler, T., Ratner, D., & Vidangos, I. (2017). Racial gaps in labor market outcomes in the last four decades and over the business cycle.
Center for Law and Social Policy. (2016a). Pell Grants. https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/public/documents/toolkit-pdfs/Pell-Grants.pdf
Center for Law and Social Policy. (2016b). Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Title II: Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/public/documents/toolkit-pdfs/WIOA-Title-II-Adult-Edu.pdf
Clark, Y. J., & Richard, B. (2022). Performance and Equity in Colorado’s WIOA Programs A Sequential Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Currie, J., & Madrian, B. C. (1999). Health, health insurance and the labor market. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 3309–3416.
Data.Gov. (2022). WIOA Individual Performance Record Data. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/wioa-individual-performance-record-data
Dunham, K., Paprocki, A., Grey, C., Sattar, S., & Roemer, G. (2020). Change and continuity in the adult and dislocated worker programs under WIOA. Mathematica.
Ekerdt, D. J., De Viney, S., & Kosloski, K. (1996). Profiling plans for retirement. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 51B(3), S140–S149. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/51B.3.S140
Funk, C., & Parker, K. (2018). Women and Men in STEM Often at Odds Over Workplace Equity. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/women-and-men-in-stem-often-at-odds-over-workplace-equity/
Georgia Department of Economic Development. (2016). State Launches WorkSource Georgia. https://www.georgia.org/newsroom/press-releases/state-launches-worksource-georgia
Georgia Department of Human Services. (2021). Demand for professionals in aging field increasing. https://dhs.georgia.gov/spotlight/2021-04-19/demand-professionals-aging-field-increasing
Georgia Department of Human Services Division of Aging Services. (2019). Senior Community Service Employment Program Participant Handbook.
Groes, F., Kircher, P., & Manovskii, I. (2015). The U-shapes of occupational mobility. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(2), 659–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu037
Halvorsen, C. J., Werner, K., & McColloch, E. (2020). The senior community service employment program: its influence on participant well-being—and recommendations to strengthen it.
Halvorsen, C. J., & Yulikova, O. (2020). Job training and so much more for low-income older adults: The senior community service employment program. Clinical Social Work Journal, 48(2), 223–229.
Harootyan, B. (2021). Hidden dimensions of ageism in employment and the weakening of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Public Policy & Aging Report, 31(4), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prab020
Harris, K., Krygsman, S., Waschenko, J., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Ageism and the older worker: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, 58(2), e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194
IPUMS. (2023). IPUMS USA. https://www.ipums.org/projects/ipums-usa
Johnson, R. W., & Mommaerts, C. (2011). Age differences in job loss, job search, and reemployment. The Urban Institute.
Karpinska, K., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2011). Impact of age norms and stereotypes on managers’ hiring decisions of retirees.
Klehe, U. C., Koen, J., & De Pater, I. E. (2012). Ending on the scrap heap? The experience of job loss and job search among older workers. In The Oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 313–340). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195385052.001.0001
Lahey, J. N. (2008). Age, women, and hiring. Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 30–56. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=gnh&AN=EP28747370&site=ehost-live&custid=uga1
Laughlin, L., Martinez, A., & Gayfield, A. (2022). Who Are the STEM Workers Under Age 25? https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/11/stem-workers-under-age-25.html
Leino-Arjas, P., Liira, J., Mutanen, P., Malmivaara, A., & Matikainen, E. (1999). Predictors and consequences of unemployment among construction workers: Prospective cohort study. BMJ, 319(7210), 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7210.600
Maestas, N., & Li, X. (2006). Discouraged workers? Job search outcomes of older workers. SSRN Electronic Journal, 133. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1095278
McGregor, J., & Gray, L. (2003). Older worker employment transition. Citeseer.
McNamara, T. K., Sano, J. B., & Williamson, J. B. (2010). The pros and cons of pro-work policies and programs for older workers. In The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging. Citeseer.
Mikelson, K. S. (2017). The role of SCSEP in workforce training for low-income older workers. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Neumark, D., Burn, I., & Button, P. (2017). Age discrimination and hiring of older workers. Age, 6(1), 1–5.
Neumark, D., Burn, I., & Button, P. (2019). Is it harder for older workers to find jobs? New and improved evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 922–970.
Neumark, D., & Song, J. (2013). Do stronger age discrimination laws make Social Security reforms more effective? Journal of Public Economics, 108, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.09.006
OECD. (2006). Live Longer, Work Longer. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264035881-en
Patacchini, E., & Engelhardt, G. V. (2016). Work, retirement, and social networks at older ages. CRR WP, 15.
Perron, R. (2018). The value of experience: age discrimination against older workers persists. In AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00177.002
Rizzuto, T. E., Cherry, K. E., & LeDoux, J. A. (2012). The aging process and cognitive capabilities. In The Oxford handbook of work and aging. (pp. 236–255). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195385052.013.0092
Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Schouweiler, M., & Sobek, M. (2022). IPUMS USA: Version 12.0 . IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V12.0
Rutledge, M. S., & Guan, Q. (2015). Job Polarization and Labor Market Outcomes for Older, Middle-Skilled Workers (No. 2015–23). Center for Retirement Research, Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
Schwingel, A., Niti, M. M., Tang, C., & Ng, T. P. (2009). Continued work employment and volunteerism and mental well-being of older adults: Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Age and Ageing, 38(5), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp089
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Unemployment rates. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. https://www.bls.gov/data/
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). May 2020 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. https://www.bls.gov/oes/2020/may/oes_ga.htm
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). American Community Survey Information Guide. US Census Bureau Washington, DC. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/programs-surveys/acs/about/ACS_Information_Guide.pdf
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2008). Bridges to opportunity: federal adult education programs for the 21st century: report to the President on Executive Order 13445.
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2014). The Trade Adjustment Assistance Program: Getting Back to Work after a Trade Related Layoff. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/tradeact/pdfs/program_brochure2014.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2016). Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/wioa/pdfs/WIOA_Factsheets.pdf
Senior Community Service Employment Program, Performance Accountability, 83 FR 36407. (2018). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/07/30/2018-16216/senior-community-service-employment-program-performance-accountability
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2018). WIOA Performance Indicators and Measures. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/performance/performance-indicators#WIOA PIP
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2020). Data Book Archive. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/performance/results/data-book-archive
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2021a). Adult Literacy and Education Initiative. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/reports/adult-literacy-education-initiative
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2021b). WIOA Adult Program. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/workforce-investment/adult
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2021c). WIOA Dislocated Worker Program. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/workforce-investment/dislocated-workers
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2022). WIOA Individual Performance Records (Public Use Data) Archive: Public Use File Record Layout. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/performance/results/pirl
U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2023). WIOA Title I and III Annual Report Data: Program Year 2021.
U.S. Executive Office of the President, & U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2018). Standard Occupational Classiciation Manual.
U.S. National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). What is the CIP. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/default.aspx?y=55
U.S. National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). CIP2020 SOC2018 Crosswalk. CIP SOC Crosswalk. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/post3.aspx?y=56
U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging. (2017). America’s aging workforce: opportunities and challenges.
von Schrader, S., & Nazarov, Z. E. (2016). Trends and patterns in Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) charges. Research on Aging, 38(5), 580–601.
What are training services for adults and dislocated workers?, 20 CFR 680. 200. (2023). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/chapter-V/part-680/subpart-B/section-680.200
WorkSource Georgia. (2020). State of Georgia Four Year WIOA Unified State Plan. https://www.tcsg.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Proposed-GA-State-Plan_1.17.2020.pdf
WorkSource Georgia. (2021a). State of Georgia PY19 WIOA Annual Narrative Report. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/eta/performance/pdfs/PY2019/GA_PY19WIOAAnnualReportNarrative.pdf
WorkSource Georgia. (2021b). Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Policy Manual. https://www.tcsg.edu/worksource/resources-for-practitioners/policies-guidance/
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to the Data and Information Director at the Office of Workforce Development in the Technical College System of Georgia for collaborating on this project. I would also like to extend my thanks to Dr. Anthony Mallon for facilitating the partnership with the community resource, as well as Drs. Orion Mowbray, Mary Ager, and Christina Matz for their valuable insights and advice on this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yeo, H. The Effect of Workforce Development Program Participation on Older Workers Aged 50 or Older in Georgia. J of Pol Practice & Research 5, 9–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-023-00090-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-023-00090-9