Skip to main content

“Piecemeal” Advocacy, Radical Accomplishments: Adding Normatizing to the Advocacy Toolbox

Journal of Policy Practice and Research (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Women’s rights advocates in Iowa successfully got state laws adopted in the late 1980s and in 2009 requiring gender balance on state and local boards and commissions, the only such laws in the USA. Through interview and archival methods, this paper uses a critical juncture framework to unveil how this was accomplished in part through a strategy underexplored in academic and practitioner literature—deradicalizing an issue through a series of “piecemeal” efforts. Small less controversial changes can build up to alter the status quo, making room for changes previously thought unaccomplishable. This study brings normatizing—the process of incrementally institutionalizing new norms—forward as a socialization strategy for social movement actors to intentionally consider employing in situations they encounter where political will on an issue is substantially lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. See Table 1 of the Appendix. Key players mentioned.

  2. See Table 2 of the Appendix. Key pieces of adopted legislation.

References

  • Amenta, E., Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2019). The political institutions, processes, and outcomes movements seek to influence. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 449–465). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, C.F. & Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.

  • Bear, A., & Knobe, J. (2016). Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive. Cognition, 167, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Anchor Books.

  • Berkun, S. (2010). The myths of innovation. O’Reilly Media.

  • Bernstein, M. (2003). Nothing ventured, nothing gained? Conceptualizing social movement “success” in the lesbian and gay movement. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 353–379. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/799797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, K. A., Kendall, J., & Max, S. (2014). Organizing for social change. The Forum Press.

  • Bullard, C. (1988, February 14). Sex balance law sends bureaucrats packing, along with credentials. The Des Moines Register, B1, B7.

  • Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics. (2013). States with gender balance laws. Iowa State University of Science and Technology. https://iastate.app.box.com/v/GenderBalanceLaws

  • Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Community Health and Development. (2021). Advocating for change (Community Tool Box, Toolkit 10). University of Kansas. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/advocating-change

  • Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., & Munck, G. L. (2017). Building blocks and methodological challenges: A framework for studying critical junctures. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 15(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, K., Coonan, B., & Whisenand, S. (2019). Elevating women's voices through gender balance policies. National Association of Commissions for Women. https://www.nacw.org/uploads/1/2/0/3/120368762/nacw_presentation-_talent_bank2_-_sent_to_nacw_7-19-19_-_with_governors_....pdf

  • Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations, 69(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715577707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup, D. (2008). Gender quotas – Controversial but trendy: On expanding the research agenda. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10(3), 332–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740802185643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. A. (2011). Advocacy: Championing ideas and influencing others. Yale University Press.

  • Della Porta, D. (2020). Protests as critical junctures: Some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements. Social Movement Studies, 19(5–6), 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolinski, D. (2016). Techniques of social influence: The psychology of gaining compliance. Routledge.

  • Edelman, M. (2001). The Politics of misinformation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, R. & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1996). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2008). We will be heard: Women’s struggles for political power in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

  • Gamson, W. A. (1992a). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1992b). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, M. D. & Conlin, R. B. (1974). For release Wednesday, July 3, 1974 (Iowa Women’s Political Caucus records; box 3; series 2: Committees; folder: Publicity: Press releases, 1974). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. University of Illinois Press.

  • Guetzkow, J. (2010). Beyond deservingness: Congressional Discourse on poverty, 1964–1996. The Annals of the American Academy, 629, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209357404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1982). The Rediscovery of ideology: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture, society and the media (pp. 52–87). Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (1995). The early years of gender balance (Johnie Hammond papers; box 8; series 9: Research Files; folder: Gender balance, undated). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Hannon, B. (1997). Feb. 22, 1997 Incident3.wpd (Beverly A. Hannon papers; Box 14; series 4: Legislative Service; folder: Notes and recollections, 1985–1992). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Henry, S. (1994). The deep divide: Why American women resist equality. MacMillan Publishing.

  • Iowa General Assembly. (2021). The Iowa Legislature. State of Iowa. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/

  • Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (2019). The cultural context of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 63–78). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. G. (2014). The forest and the trees: Sociology as life, practice, and promise. Temple University Press.

  • Jowett, G. S. & O’Donnell, V. (2012). Propaganda and persuasion. Sage Publications.

  • Kahan, D.M. (2015). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm. Emerging Trends in Social & Behavioral Sciences, Forthcoming. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2703011

  • Larson, J. & Menendian, S. (2008). Anti-affirmative action ballot initiatives. The Ohio State University Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. http://www.kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/reports/2008/12_2008_AntiAffirmativeActionBallotInitiatives.pdf

  • Lee, T. (2011). Collective movements, activated opinion, and the politics of the extraordinary. In S. Odugbemi & T. Lee (Eds.), Accountability through public opinion: From inertia to public action (pp. 257–272). The World Bank.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Licata, N. (2016). Becoming a citizen activist: Stories, strategies and advice for changing our world. Sasquatch Books.

  • Lloyd-Jones, J. (1986). Women in politics (Jean Lloyd-Jones papers; box 24; series 13: Other organizations and activities; folder: Speeches, women’s issues, 1974–1985). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Mahoney, J., & Schensul, D. (2009). Historical context and path dependence. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 454–471). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M. (2001). Social values and norms. In E. F. Borgatta & R. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 2828–2840). Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1999). Political process and the development of black insurgency: 1930–1970. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Meyer, D. S. (2003). How social movements matter. Contexts. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2003.2.4.30

  • Moses, M. S., & Farley, A. N. (2011). Are ballot initiatives a good way to make education policy? The case of affirmative action. Educational Studies, 47, 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2011.573607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Observance of International Women’s Year. (1976). “...To form a more perfect union….” justice for American women. (Marjorie Randal National Women’s Conference Collection; University of Houston Libraries Special Collection; University of Houston Digital Collections). https://id.lib.uh.edu/ark:/84475/do1023vt600

  • Patel, N. (2014, October 13). Foot-in-the-door technique: How to get people to seamlessly take action. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilpatel/2014/10/13/foot-in-the-doortechnique-how-to-get-people-to-take-seamlessly-take-action/

  • Polletta, F. (2012). Three mechanisms by which culture shapes movement strategy: Repertoires, institutional norms, and metonymy. In G. M. Maney, R. V. Kutz-Flamenbaum, D. A. Rohlinger, & J. Goodwin (Eds.), Strategies for social change (pp. 43–57). University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Presidential task force on women’s rights and responsibilities. (1970). A matter of simple justice: The report of the president’s task force on women’s rights and responsibilities. Richard Nixon Foundation. https://www.nixonfoundation.org/artifact/a-matter-of-simple-justice-report-of-the-presidents-task-force-on-womens-rights/

  • Rochon, T. R. (2000). Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasota Herald-Tribune State Report. (1993). Chiles vetoes gender bill, says it would create quotas (Lonabelle Kaplan Spencer papers; box 35; series 2: Equality for Women, 1946–2003; folder: National Gender Balance Project, miscellaneous). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Schenken, S. (1991a). Johnie Hammond and Suzanne Schenken (A Political Dialogue: Iowa’s Women Legislators oral histories; box 2, series 2: Transcripts; folder: Hammond, Johnie, October 17, 1991a). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Schenken, S. (1991b). Minnette Doderer and Suzanne Schenken (A Political Dialogue: Iowa’s Women Legislators oral histories; box 2, series 2: Transcripts; folder: Doderer, Minnette, May 23, 1991b, Part 2). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V., Leifeld, P., & Malang, T. (2013). Coping with creeping catastrophes: National political systems and the challenge of slow-moving policy problems. In B. Siebenhüner, M. Arnold, K. Eisenack, & K. Jacob (Eds.), Long-Term Governance for Social-Ecological Change (pp. 221–238). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, R. (2003). Stir it up: Lessons in community organizing and advocacy. Jossey Bass.

  • Sgier, L. (2004). Gender quota debates as discourses on the public sphere. Working with ideology in a post ideological age, EPCR Joint Session of Workshops.

  • Smock, K. (2004). Democracy in action: Community organizing and urban change. Columbia University Press.

  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, S. A., & Roggeband, C. (2019). Diffusion processes within and across movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 236–251). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, K. (1989). RE: 1987 Iowa legislation to require a gender balance on all state boards and commissions – Packet update (Johnie Hammond papers; box 8; series 9: Research Files; folder: Gender balance, undated). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries

  • Spencer, K. (2004). Gender balance summary #1 (Lonabelle Kaplan Spencer papers; box 35; series 2: Equality for Women, 1946–2003; folder: National Gender Balance Project, history, 1987–1999). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 3–39). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1976). Report of the world conference of the International Women’s Year. United Nations Publication. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/586225

  • United Nations. (1996). Report of the fourth world conference on women. United Nations Publication. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/Beijing%20full%20report%20E.pdf

  • Temko, E. (2019). Navigating the Path to Presence: Ideology, Politics, and the Campaign for Gender Balanced Boards and Commissions in Iowa. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire.

  • Valin, D. (1990). Contacts list: States which have introduced some form of gender balance legislation or resolution (Lonabelle Kaplan Spencer papers; box 42; series 13: National Gender Balance Project, 1971–2004; folder: Progress reports). Reproduced, with permission, from the collections of the Iowa Women’s Archives, University of Iowa Libraries.

  • Van Dyke, N., & Taylor, V. (2019). The cultural outcomes of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 482–498). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • VeneKlasen, L. & Miller, V. (2007). A new weave of power, people, and politics: The action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. Practical Action Publishing.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Centennial Center for Political Science and Public Affairs’ Women & Politics Fund and a grant from the Linda and Richard Kerber Fund for Research in the Iowa Women’s Archives.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA

    Ezra Temko

Authors
  1. Ezra Temko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezra Temko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dr. Ezra Temko is an applied political sociologist at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. Dr. Temko previously worked as a community organizer and served on the Newark (DE) City Council.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Key players mentioned
Full size table
Table 2 Key pieces of adopted legislation
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Temko, E. “Piecemeal” Advocacy, Radical Accomplishments: Adding Normatizing to the Advocacy Toolbox. J of Pol Practice & Research (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-022-00072-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-022-00072-3

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Activism
  • Critical juncture analysis
  • Gender balance
  • Social movement strategy