Skip to main content

Biomass and carbon recovery of secondary forest in a Montane Subtropical Forest of North Eastern India

Abstract

Shifting cultivation has been the primary cause of forest degradation and destruction. Secondary forests are spreading around the globe and hence the importance of secondary forests has been recognised and its growth could help to alleviate the effects of deforestation and supplement existing conservation efforts. Various complex processes occur in regenerating secondary forests; in the initial stages, the forests are dominated by herbs and shrubs, and in the latter stages, trees predominate. The current study was carried out in Reiek forest, Mizoram, India at various phases of succession following abandonment in order to better understand biomass and carbon recovery in differently aged fallow periods (FP) and natural forest (NF). Fallow ages were divided into four categories: FP03, FP07, FP11, and FP15 (i.e., 0–3, 4–7, 8–11, and 12–15 years old), with three additional experimental plots in NF for comparison. In this study the biomass and carbon in standing vegetation were estimated. The soil organic carbon (SOC) was also quantified. We found that all the fallow ages and NF were significantly different in biomass, carbon stock, and SOC. Longer fallow period (FP) stores more biomass and carbon than shorter FP. Total biomass stock (TBS) of more than 42% and total carbon stock (TCS) of more than 43% of NF was achieved in plots abandoned for 12–15 years. Although SC fallow takes longer period to recover to a forest, they perform a crucial role as a carbon sink in the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Borah JR, Evan KL, Edwards D (2018) Quantifying carbon stocks in shifting cultivation landscapes under different management scenarios relevant to REDD+. Ecol Appl 28(6):1581–1593. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1764

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. Oecologia 111:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Folster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emrich A, Pokorny B, Sepp C (2000) The significance of secondary forest management for development policy. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH Postfach 5180 D-65726. ISBN: 3-933-984-49-1. Eschborn, pp 1–85

  • FAO (2010) Global forest resource asessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. ISBN 978-92-106654–6, pp 1–378

  • Gogoi A, Sahoo UK, Saikai H (2020) Vegetation and ecosystem carbon recovery following shifting cultivation in Mizoram-Manipur-Kachin Rainforest Eco-region, Southern Asia. Ecol Process 9(21):2–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00225-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauchhum R, Singson MZ (2020) Tree species composition and diversity in abandoned Jhum lands of Mizoram, North East India. Trop Ecol 61:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00079-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich VHA, Dalagnol R, Cassol HLG, Rosan TM, de Almeida CT, Silva Junior CHL, Campanharo WA, House JI, Sitch S, Hales TC, Adami M, Anderson LO, Aragão LEOC (2021) Large carbon sink potential of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon to mitigate climate change. Nat Commun 12(1):1785. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22050-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use. Land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Kanagawa, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4, agriculture, forestry and other land use. Prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama

  • Jiang L, Han X, Dong N, Wang Y, Kardol P (2011) Plant species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a temperate steppe of northern China. Plant Soil 346:331–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0822-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanawjia A, Kumar M, Sheikh AM (2013) Specific gravity of some woody species in the Srinagar valley of the Garhwal Himalayas. India. For Sci Pract 15(1):85–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1632-013-0109-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanjilal UN, Kanjilal PC, Das A, De RN, Bor NL (1934–1940) Flora of Assam, 5 vol. Government Press, Shillong

  • Koh L (2007) Impending disaster or sliver of hope for Southeast Asian forests? The devil may lie in the details. Biodivers Conserv 16:3935–3938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9177-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) Shifting cultivation. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00485-9

  • Lalramnghinglova (1997) A handbook of common trees of Mizoram. Aizawl, Mizoram, pp 1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalramnghinglova (2003) Ethno-Medicinal Plants of Mizoram, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, pp 1–333

  • Lawrence D, Radel C, Tully K, Schmook B, Schneider L (2010) Untangling a decline in tropical forest resilience: constraints on the sustainability of shifting cultivation across the globe. Biotropica 42(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDicken KG (1997) A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry projects. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Department

  • Melgoza MAS, Skutsch MM, Lovett JC, Borrego A (2017) Carbon emissions from dryland shifting cultivation: a case study of Mexican tropical dry forest. Silva Fennica 51(1B):1553. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J, Cramb RA, Leisz SJ, Lam NT, Vien TD (2009) Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Hum Ecol 37(3):259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9245-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J (2016) Tropical secondary forests regenerating after shifting cultivation in the Philippines uplands are important carbon sinks. Sci Rep 6(1):22483. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22483

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pain A, Marquardt K, Lindh A, Hasselquist NJ (2021) What is secondary about secondary tropical forest? Rethinking forest landscapes. Hum Ecol 49(3):239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00203-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal JP (1988) Wet evergreen forests of the western ghats of India: ecology, structure, floristic composition and succession. Institute Francais de Pondichery, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier J, Codjia C, Potvin C (2012) Traditional shifting agriculture: tracking forest carbon stock and biodiversity through time in western Panama. Glob Change Biol 18(12):3581–3595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02788.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Vos C, Don A (2017) Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content. Soil 3(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-61-2017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter L, Bongers F, Aide TM, Zambrano AMA, Balvanera P, Becknell JM et al (2016) Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530(7589):211–214

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan A, Mishra S, Behera N (2016) Species diversity and biomass carbon analysis of the tree layer in a sacred natural forest patch from Western Odisha. Int J Environ Sci 7:113–122. https://doi.org/10.6088/ijes.7011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read L, Lawrence D (2003) Recovery of biomass following shifting cultivation in dry tropical forests of the Yucatan. Ecol Appl 13:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0085:ROBFSC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozendaal DMA, Chazdon RL (2015) Demographic drivers of tree biomass change during secondary succession in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecol Appl 25(2):506–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawmliana M (2003) The book of Mizoram plants. Published by P. Zakhuma, Aizawl, Mizoram. pp 1–442

  • Sharma SB, Singh NS, Lalruatfela R (2018) Tree Diversity and Carbon Stocks of Hmuifang Forest, Mizoram. Int J Res BioScience 7(1):87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Tewari JC, Yadav S, Ralhan PK (1986) Population structure of tree species in forests as an indicator of regeneration and future stability. Proc Indian Acad Sci 96(6):443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subedi BP, Pandey SS, Pandey A, Rana E, Bhattarai S, Banskota TR, Charmakar S, Tamrakar R (2010) Forest carbon stock measurement: guidelines for measuring carbon stocks in community-managed forests. Norad, ICIMOD, ANSAB, FECOFUN, Kathmandu, Nepal

  • Thong P, Pebam R, Sahoo UK (2016) Recovery pattern of vegetation during succession following slash and burn agriculture in Mizoram, North-East India. J Plant Biol Soil Health 3(2):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanne AE, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Coomes DA, Ilic J, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Miller R, Swenson NG, Wiemann MC, Chave J (2009) Global Wood Density Database. Data from: towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum, Dryad Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, for providing financial support in the form of INSPIRE Fellowship (Grant No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160826 dated 30.9.2016). Mr. Beiseiliana (field guide) was very helpful in the field study and sample collection, which the authors appreciate. The authors are also grateful for the cooperation and assistance of Village Council officials in completing field work efficiently.

Funding

This work was supported by Department of Science and Technology—New Delhi, Government of India in the form of INSPIRE Fellowship (Grant No. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160826 dated 30.9.2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SBS, SK, NH: Conceptualization, methodology. SBS, SK, NH: Formal analysis. SBS: Investigation, writing original draft. SK: Supervision. All authors revised, provided critical feedback and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 32 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S.B., Kumar, S. & Hegde, N. Biomass and carbon recovery of secondary forest in a Montane Subtropical Forest of North Eastern India. Trop Ecol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-022-00246-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-022-00246-w

Keywords

  • Aboveground biomass
  • Carbon sink
  • Fallow period
  • Forest succession
  • Natural forest
  • Secondary forests
  • Shifting cultivation