Abstract
Allometric regression models are one of the common methods of carbon stock estimation based on growing stock data conversion to estimates of above ground biomass (AGB). Therefore, allometric model selection is important functional aspect that has considerable influence on accuracy of biomass estimation. As destructive sampling is restricted in our study area, the site specific biomass model is developed for the first time based upon the forest inventory data that includes measurements of diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height (H). To minimize the error in AGB estimation, intensive sampling was done where 78,201 individual tree were enumerated (6034 quadrats laid over 1207 plots). 20 locally abundant tree species were assessed. Tree volume and biomass were calculated and examined for best fit allometric model for the area. Species-specific models were established which best fits with the DBH as predictor variable. For multi-species models, inclusion of wood density (WD) enhanced the model fitness with increased adjusted R2 by 99.9%. Significant variations in predicted and observed values were noticed while considering the regional and pan-tropical models (model prediction error − 614.364 to 288.304%). Therefore, development of local models would provide more accurate AGB estimates. Best fit multi-species allometric model in our study is represented by ln (AGB) = a + b ln (DBH) + c ln (H) + d ln(WD). The equation developed for tropical forest of Eastern India applicable for Sal zone of Bihar is ln(AGB) = − 0.886 + 2ln(DBH) + ln(H) + ln(WD).
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42965-020-00098-2/MediaObjects/42965_2020_98_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42965-020-00098-2/MediaObjects/42965_2020_98_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42965-020-00098-2/MediaObjects/42965_2020_98_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42965-020-00098-2/MediaObjects/42965_2020_98_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AGB :
-
Above ground biomass
- AIC:
-
Akaike Information Criterion
- AICw:
-
Akaike information criterion weight
- DBH:
-
Diameter at breast height
- H:
-
Tree height
- ME:
-
Model efficiency
- MPE:
-
Model prediction error
- MSE:
-
Mean squared error
- MSR:
-
Mean square residual
- REDD:
-
Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation
- RMSE:
-
Root mean square error
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SE:
-
Standard error
- VIF:
-
Variance influencial factor
- WD:
-
Wood densitywood density
References
Alvarez E, Rodriguez L, Duque A, Saldarriaga J, Cabrera K, De Las Salas G, Del Valle I, Lema A, Moreno F, Orrego S (2012) Tree above-ground biomass allometries for carbon stocks estimation in the natural forests of Colombia. For Ecol Manage 267:297–308
Alves D, Soare JV, Amaral S, Mello E, Almeida S, Da Silva OF, Silveira A (1997) Biomass of primary and secondary vegetation in Rondonia, Western Brazilian Amazon. Glob Chang Biol 3:451–461
Alves LF, Santos FM (2002) Tree allometry and crown shape of four tree species in Atlantic rain forest, south-east Brazil. J Trop Ecol 18:245–260
Basuki TM, van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, HussinYA (2009) Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manage 257:1684–1694
Biswas S, Mukhopadhyay SC (2016) Plant community structure and carbon stock assessment through phytosociological approach at dry tropics of Banka Forest Division, Bihar. Ind J Plant Sc 5(4):72–82
Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry Paper no. 134, Rome, p 55
Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902
Chang A, Eo Y, Kim Y, Kim Y (2013) Identification of individual tree crowns from LiDAR data using a circle fitting algorithm with local maxima and minima filtering. Remote Sens Lett 4:37–41
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Folster H, Fromard F, Higuchi Kira T, Lescure JP, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99
Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R (2004) Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:409–420
Chave J, Rejou-Mechain M, Burquez A, Chidumayo E, Colgan MS, Delitti WB, Duque A, Eid T, Fearnside PM, Goodman RC, Henry M, Martinez-Yrizar A, Mugasha WA, Muller-Landau HC, Mencuccini M, Nelson BW, Ngomanda A, Nogueira EM, Ortiz-Malavassi E, Pelissier R, Ploton P, Ryan CM, Saldarriaga JG, Vieilledent G (2014) Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol 10(10):3177–3190
Djomo AN, Ibrahima A, Saborowski J, Gravenhorst G (2010) Allometric equations for biomass estimations in Cameroon and pan moist tropical equations including biomass data from Africa. For Ecol Manage 260:1873–1885
Hashimoto T, Tange T, Masumori M, Yagi H, Sasaki S, Kojima K (2004) Allometric equations for pioneer tree species and estimation of the aboveground biomass of a tropical secondary forest in East Kalimantan. Tropics 14:123–130
Kenzo T, Furutani R, Hattori D, Kendawang JJ, Tanaka S, Sakurai K, Ninomiya I (2009) Allometric equations for accurate estimation of above-ground biomass in logged-over tropical rainforests in Sarawak Malaysia. J For Res 365–372
Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, Ambagau’ Y, Palm CA (2001) Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manage 146:199–209
Khalid N, Hamid JRA (2017) Development of allometric equation for estimating aboveground biomass in Ampang Forest Reserve, Malaysia. J Biodiv Manage For 6(1):1–4
Kumar L, Mutanga O (2017) Remote sensing of above-ground biomass. Remote Sens 9:935
Li LE, Lin YJ, Yen TM (2016) Using allometric models to predict the aboveground biomass of Thorny Bamboo (Bambusa stenostachya) and estimate its carbon storage. Taiwan J For Sci 31(1):37–47
Litton CM (2008) Allometric models for predicting aboveground biomass in two widespread woody plants in Hawaii. Biotropica 40(3):313–320
Mahmood H, Saberi O, Japar Sidik B, Misri K (2008) Net primary productivity of Bruguiera parviflora (Wight and Arn.) dominated mangrove forest at Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. For Ecol Manage 255:179–182
Mahmood H, Siddique MRH, Akhter M (2016) A critical review and database of biomass and volume allometric equation for trees and shrubs of Bangladesh. IOP Conference Series, Ear Env Sci 39:012057
Mahmood H, Siddique MRH, Costello L, Birigazzi L, Abdullah SMR, Henry M, Siddiqui BN, Aziz T, Ali S, Al Mamun A, Forhad MIK, Akhter M, Iqbal Z, Mondol FK (2019a) Allometric models for estimating biomass, carbon and nutrient stock in the Sal zone of Bangladesh. iForest 12:69–75. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2758-011
Mahmood H, Siddique MRH, Islam SMZ, Abdullah SMR, Matieu H, Iqbal MZ, Akhter M (2019b) Applicability of semi-destructive method to derive allometric model for estimating aboveground biomass and carbon stock in the Hill zone of Bangladesh. J For Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00881-5
Manuri S, Brack C, Nugroho NP, Hergoualc’h K, Novita N, Dotzauer H, Verchot L, Putra CAS, Widyasari E (2014) Tree biomass equations for tropical peat swamp forest ecosystems in Indonesia. For Ecol Manage 334:241–253
Maulana SI, Wibisono Y, Utomo S (2016) Development of local allometric equation to estimate total aboveground biomass in Papua tropical forest. Indo J For Res 3(2):107–118
Mayer D, Butler D (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68(1):21–32
Moussa M, Mahamane L (2018) Allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass and carbon in Faidherbia albida and Prosopis africana under agroforestry parklands in drylands of Niger. J For Res 29(6):1703–1717
Nam VT, Van Kuijk M, Anten NPR (2016) Allometric equations for aboveground and belowground biomass estimations in an evergreen forest in Vietnam. PLoS One 11(6):e0156827
Nelson BW, Mesquita R, Pereira JLG, Garcia Aquino de Souza S, Teixeira Batista G, Bovino Couto L (1999) Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon. For Ecol Manage 117:149–167
Ngomanda A, Engone Obiang NL, Lebamba J, Moundounga Mavouroulou Q, Gomat H, Mankou GS, Loumeto J, Midoko Iponga D, Kossi Ditsouga F, Zinga Koumba R (2014) Site-specific versus pantropical allometric equations: which option to estimate the biomass of a moist central African forest? For Ecol Manage 312:1–9
Okuda T, Suzuki M, Numata S, Yoshida K, Nishimura S (2004) Estimation of aboveground biomass in logged and primary lowland rainforests using 3-Dphotogrammetric analysis. For Ecol Manage 203:63–75
Pelletier J, Ramankutty N, Potvin C (2011) Diagnosing the uncertainty and detectability of emission reduction for REDD + under current capabilities: an example for Panama. Environ Res Lett 6:024005
Picard N, Rutishauser E, Ploton P, Ngomanda A, Henry M (2015) Should tree biomass allometry be restricted to power models? Forest Ecol Manage 353:156–163
Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA, Boot RGA, Sayer JA, Sheil D, Sist P, Elias Vanclay JK (2008) Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLoS Biol 6:166
Sileshi GW (2014) A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. Forest Ecol Manage 329:237–254
Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H (2013) Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol 33:106–118
van Breugel M (2007) Dynamics of secondary forests. PhD dissertation. C.T. de Wit Graduate School Production Ecology & Resource Conservation, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psych Bull Rev 11(1):192–196
Waikhom AC, Nath AJ, Yadava PS (2018) Above ground biomass and carbon stock in the largest sacred grove of Manipur, Northeast India. J For Res 29:425
Zeng W, Tang S (2012) Modeling compatible single-tree aboveground biomass equations for masson pine (Pinus massoniana) in southern China. J For Res 23(4):593–598
Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2004) On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. For Ecol Manage 187:311–332
Acknowledgements
S.B. (first author) acknowledges Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for continuing research under Women Scientist Scheme A (File No.SR/WOS-A/LS-178/2017(G)). A.B. acknowledges University Grants Commission, Government of India for continuing research under Dr. D.S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship (No.F.4-2/2006(BSR)/OT/18-19/0009). The Department of Forest, Bihar and Indian Institute of Bio-social Research and Development, Kolkata is thankfully acknowledged for their assistance. Authors are also thankful to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Chief Conservator of Forest, Conservator of Forest, District Forest Officer, Working Plan Officer of Bihar Forest Department and field staffs for their assistance during the field work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest about this research in any financial or non-financial form as it was solely a scientific study.
Ethical statement
The authors declare that the study did not require any special ethical permission due to absence of any direct or indirect involvement of living animals including human. The study solely concentrated on the various assessments considering plant biomass where only non-destructive sampling and measurements were sufficient to justify the aims and objectives of current study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, S., Biswas, A., Das, A. et al. Biomass model development for carbon stock estimation in the tropical forest of Eastern India: an allometric approach. Trop Ecol 61, 360–370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00098-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00098-2