Abstract
We discuss Fryzlewicz’s paper that proposes WBS2.SDLL approach to detect possibly frequent changes in mean of a series. Our focus is on the potential issues related to the model misspecification. We present some numerical examples such as the self-exciting threshold autoregression and the unit root process, that can be confused as a frequent change-points model.
References
Carrasco, M. (2002). Misspecified structural change, threshold, and Markov-switching models. Journal of Econometrics, 109(2), 239–273.
Koo, B., & Seo, M. H. (2015). Structural-break models under mis-specification: Implications for forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 188(1), 166–181.
Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1361-1401.
Seo, M. H. (2008). Unit root test in a threshold autoregression: asymptotic theory and residual-based block bootstrap. Econometric Theory, 24(6), 1699–1716.
Tong, H., & Lim, K. S. (1980). Threshold autoregression, limit cycles and cyclical data-with discussion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology, 42(3), 245–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A5A2A01033487).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seo, M.H. Frequent or systematic changes? discussion on “Detecting possibly frequent change-points: Wild Binary Segmentation 2 and steepest-drop model selection.”. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 49, 1096–1098 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-020-00078-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-020-00078-1