Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Analysis and Prioritisation of Non-core Roads in India: A Case Study

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The road network is a major asset for every developing nation. Data collection, analysis, and arriving at economical maintenance work plans are said to be major goals for every road agency. Successful implementation of Pavement Management Systems can result in ease of decision-making about investments incurred for the maintenance of road networks. Advanced pavement maintenance strategies ensure the rational utilisation of limited funds scientifically. Based on existing pavement conditions, a systematic procedure is required to analyse the impacts of different maintenance strategies based on the predicted future pavement conditions. The present study attempts to develop a prioritised work programme for an identified non-core road network in India using the Highway Development and Management tool. Pavement distress data for non-core roads with a total length of 1743.9 km were collected using a Network Survey Vehicle and stored in a customised central database. Six maintenance strategies were formulated and predicted the International Roughness Index values, and they were compared with those obtained from the conventional maintenance strategy adopted by the state agency. Furthermore, an economic analysis was carried out, and the best strategy was proposed based on optimised costs. The predicted International Roughness Index (IRI) from the proposed strategy was found to be 37% lower than the predicted IRI using a conventionally adopted maintenance strategy. Such road asset management studies should be popularised by the state public works department for non-core roads to optimise the resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wells, W. (1984). Developing pavement management systems at county and city levels. No. 997. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1984/997/997-005.pdf.

  2. Krugler, Paul E., Carlos M. Chang-Albitres, Kirby W. Pickett, Roger E. Smith, Illya V. Hicks, Peterson, D.E., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. & United States Federal Highway Administration, 1987. Pavement management practices, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=toledo1526556465835906&disposition=inline.

  3. Baker, M.J., Mahoney, J.P. and Sivaneswaran, N. (2004). Engineering application of Washington State’s pavement management system. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1643, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/1643-05.

  4. Silva, F., Van Dam, T., Bulleit, W., & Ylitalo, R. (2000). Proposed pavement performance models for local government agencies in Michigan. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1699, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.3141/1699-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Butt, A. A., M. Shahin, S. Carpenter, and J. Carnahan. Application of Markov process to pavement management systems at network level, Proceedings of the third international conference on managing pavements, national research council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 159–172. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/conf/1994/cp1/cp1-v2-018.pdf.

  6. Stantec Consulting Inc. HPMA software—version 7.28.023 HQ.

  7. Mataei, B., Nejad, F. M., & Zakeri, H. (2021). Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation optimization based on cloud decision tree. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14, 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-0306-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R. B., & Way, G. B. (1982). A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12(6), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.6.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira, A., Antunes, A., & Picado-Santos, L. (2002). Probabilistic segment-linked pavement management optimization model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(6), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1061/~ASCE!0733-947X~2002!128:6-568!

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balla, C. (2010). Prediction of remaining service life of pavements. https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2018.3.356-367

  11. Federal Highway Administration, 2007. CULVERT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Alabama, Maryland, Minnesota, and Shelby County, FHWA IF-07-032. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/tamcs_cms.pdf.

  12. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., & Kennedy, T. W. (1975). Role of pavement evaluation in a pavement management system. Fourth Interamerican Conference on Materials Technology, 732–742. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Engineering Village 2 database. https://scholar.utc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1530&context=theses.

  13. Jordaan, G. J., Servas, V. P., & Marias, C. P. (1986). A suggested approach to bituminous pavement evaluation and rehabilitation design. The Civil Engineer in South Africa, 28, 41–48. Retrieved October 24, 2012, from Engineering Village 2 database. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/37293.

  14. Veeraragavan, A., & Chakraborty, N. (2000). Prioritisation of Pavement Maintenance based on Economic Criteria. In first european pavement management systems conference-proceedings and final program, book of abstracts. https://trid.trb.org/Results?q=&serial=%22FIRST%20EUROPEAN%20PAVEMENT%20MANAGEMENT%20SYSTEMS%20CONFERENCE%20%20PROCEEDINGS%20AND%20FINAL%20PROGRAM%2C%20BOOK%20OF%20ABSTRACTS%22.

  15. Roy, N., Issac Kuncheria, P., & Veeraragavan, A. (2003). Highway development and management tool (HDM-4): Calibration to Indian conditions and its application-case study. Highway Research Bulletin No, 69, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.606320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal, P. K., Das, A., & Chakroborty, P. (2004). A rational approach for prioritization of highway sections for maintenance. Proceedings In 6th International Conference on Managing Pavement, Brisbane, Australia. https://trid.trb.org/view/771280

  17. Nautiyal, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). Methods and factors of prioritizing roads for maintenance: A review for sustainable flexible pavement maintenance program. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00771-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nautiyal, A., & Sharma, S. (2021). Condition based maintenance planning of low volume rural roads using GIS. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nautiyal, A., & Sharma, S. (2021). Scientific approach using AHP to prioritize low volume rural roads for pavement maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-12-2019-0111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nautiyal, A., & Sharma, S. (2019). A model to compute service life of rural roads using present pavement condition and pavement age. Compusoft, 8(7), 3261–3268.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, I., & Sreenivasulu, P. (2005). Prioritisation of road maintenance operations using HDM-4 model-a case study. Indian highways, 33(5). https://trid.trb.org/view/789469

  22. Shankar, S., Prasad, C. S. R. K., & Bhaskar, B. (2010). Rural road pavement performance evaluation–a case study. In the PIARC International Seminar on Sustainable Maintenance of Rural Roads, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. https://www.piarc.org/en/activities/PIARC-International-Seminars-Proceedings/PIARC-International-Seminars2010/hyderabad_January10

  23. Shah, Y. U., Jain, S. S., Tiwari, D., & Jain, M. K. (2013). Development of overall pavement condition index for urban road network. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 332–341. https://cyberleninka.org/article/n/1199576/viewer

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the AECOM India Pvt. Ltd for granting permission to complete dissertation of the main author. Also, thanks to Mr. Vijay Kumar for guiding the work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Gowda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gowda, S., Kavitha, G. & Gupta, A. Economic Analysis and Prioritisation of Non-core Roads in India: A Case Study. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 17, 481–494 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-022-00250-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-022-00250-2

Keywords

Navigation