Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bitumen and Paraffin Wax Encapsulated Cigarette Butts: Physical Properties and Leachate Analysis

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Littered cigarette butts (CBs) are a form of poorly biodegradable waste. Attempts have been made to prevent the pollution caused by the waste through the recycling of CBs in construction materials. A novel method involving the encapsulation of CBs with paraffin wax and bitumen was developed, which investigated its use in hot-dense asphalt concrete with promising results. The objective of this study was to carry out a comprehensive leachate analysis to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the encapsulation method for the prevention of heavy metal leachates from CBs and to investigate the physical properties of wax and bitumen encapsulated CBs. The leachate analysis was conducted using the Australian Bottle Leaching Procedure (ABLP) for pH values 2.9, 5.0, and 9.2. The leaching behavior of encapsulated CBs was insignificant compared to fresh CBs due to the immobilization of metals after being encapsulated in bitumen and wax. The findings suggest that the variance in pH influences the behavior of the metal concentration leached. Generally, pH 2.9 resulted in the highest metal contamination for all sample types, followed by pH 5.0 and pH 9.2. The water absorption decreased significantly from 383% for fresh CBs to 4% and 5% for bitumen and wax encapsulated CBs. Micro-X-ray CT imaging was used to study and analyze the porosity and pore structure of CBs, and a substantial decrease in porosity from 66% to 0.5% was determined when CBs were encapsulated with bitumen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Root, T. (2019). Cigarette butts are toxic plastic pollution. Should they be banned? National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/08/cigarettes-story-of-plastic/. Accessed on 7 July 2020.

  2. Quit Victoria. (2018). A load of rubbish: Tobacco-related litter costs Vic economy $25.7m per year. https://www.quit.org.au/news/load-rubbish-tobacco-related-litter-costs-vic-257m-year/. Accessed on 8 July 2020.

  3. Kurmus, H., & Mohajerani, A. (2020). The toxicity and valorization options of cigarette butts. Waste Management, 104, 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Euromonitor International. (2014). Global tobacco: Key findings part 1—Tobacco overview, cigarettes and the future. https://www.euromonitor.com/global-tobacco-key-findings-part-1-tobacco-overview-cigarettes-and-the-future/report. Accessed on 3 March 2020.

  5. Hoffmann, D., Djordjevic, M. V., & Brunnemann, K. D. (1995). Changes in cigarette design and composition over time and how they influence the yields of smoke constituents. Smoking Related Disorders, 6, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan, C. M., Gardner, R. M., & Komarek, R. J. (1993). Aerobic biodegradation of cellulose acetate. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 47, 1709–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gu, J.-D., Eberiel, D., McCarthy, S. P., & Gross, R. A. (1993). Degradation and mineralization of cellulose acetate in simulated thermophilic compost environments. Journal of Environmental Polymer Degradation, 1, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puls, J., Wilson, S. A., & Hölter, D. (2011). Degradation of cellulose acetate-based materials: A review. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 19, 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, R. M., Thomas, W. C., Suthar, J. N., & Brown, D. M. (2012). Accelerated degradation of cellulose acetate cigarette filters using controlled-release acid catalysis. Green Chemistry, 14, 2266–2272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonanomi, G., Incerti, G., Cesarano, G., Gaglione, S. A., & Lanzotti, V. (2015). Cigarette butt decomposition and associated chemical changes assessed by 13C CPMAS NMR. PLoS One, 10, e0117393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann, D., Djordjevic, M. V., & Hoffmann, I. (1997). The changing cigarette. Preventive Medicine, 26, 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffmann, D., Hoffmann, I., & El-Bayoumy, K. (2001). The less harmful cigarette: a controversial issue. A tribute to Ernst L. Wynder. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 14, 767–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, S., Banyasz, J., Parrish, M., Lyons-Hart, J., & Shafer, K. (2002). Formaldehyde in the gas phase of mainstream cigarette smoke. Journal of Analytical Applied Pyrolysis, 65, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Novotny, T. E., Hardin, S. N., Hovda, L. R., Novotny, D. J., McLean, M. K., & Khan, S. J. T. C. (2011). Tobacco and cigarette butt consumption in humans and animals. Tobacco Control, 20, 17–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Novotny, T. E., Lum, K., Smith, E., Wang, V., & Barnes, R. (2009). Cigarettes butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 1691–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruan, A., Min, H., Peng, X., & Huang, Z. (2005). Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas sp. strain HF-1, capable of degrading nicotine. Journal of Research in Microbiology, 156, 700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hackendahl, N., Sereda, C., & Volmer, P. (2004). The dangers of nicotine ingestion in dogs. Veterinary Medicine-Bonner Springs then Edwardsville, 99, 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knox, A. (2005). An overview of incineration and EFW technology as applied to the management of municipal solid waste (MSW). ONEIA Energy Subcommittee. http://www.durhamenvironmentwatch.org/Incinerator%20Files%20II/OverviewOfIncinerationAndEFWKnox.pdf. Accessed on 13 December 2020.

  19. Marinello, S., Lolli, F., Gamberini, R., & Rimini, B. (2019). A second life for cigarette butts? A review of recycling solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 384, 121–245.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kurmus, H., & Mohajerani, A. (2019). A continuation study on recycling cigarette butts in fired clay bricks. In WEC2019: World Engineers Convention 2019 (pp. 687–700). Engineers Australia, Melbourne.

  21. Kurmus, H., & Mohajerani, A. (2020). Recycling of cigarette butts in fired clay bricks: A new laboratory investigation. Materials, 13, 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurmus, H., & Mohajerani, A. (2020). Leachate analysis of heavy metals in cigarette butts and bricks incorporated with cigarette butts. Materials, 13, 2843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohajerani, A., Kadir, A. A., & Larobina, L. (2016). A practical proposal for solving the world’s cigarette butt problem: Recycling in fired clay bricks. Waste Management, 52, 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kadir, A. A., & Mohajerani, A. (2015). Effect of heating rate on gas emissions and properties of fired clay bricks and fired clay bricks incorporated with cigarette butts. Applied Clay Science, 104, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kadir, A. A., & Mohajerani, A. (2011). Recycling cigarette butts in lightweight fired clay bricks. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 164, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kadir, A. A., & Mohajerani, A. (2008). Possible utilization of cigarette butts in light-weight fired clay bricks. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2, 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kurmus, H., & Mohajerani, A. (2021). Energy savings, thermal conductivity, micro and macro structural analysis of fired clay bricks incorporating cigarette butts. Construction and Building Materials, 283, 122755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohajerani, A., Hui, S. Q., Shen, C., Suntovski, J., Rodwell, G., Kurmus, H., Hana, M., & Rahman, M. T. (2020). Implementation of recycling cigarette butts in lightweight bricks and a proposal for ending the littering of cigarette butts in our cities. Materials, 13(18), 4023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohajerani, A., Tanriverdi, Y., Nguyen, B. T., Wong, K. K., Dissanayake, H. N., Johnson, L., Whitfield, D., Thomson, G., Alqattan, E., & Rezaei, A. (2017). Physico-mechanical properties of asphalt concrete incorporated with encapsulated cigarette butts. Construction and Building Materials, 153, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Austroads. (2014). Guide to pavement technology Part 4B: Asphalt, Sydney.

  31. Rahman, M. T., & Mohajerani, A. (2020). Use of bitumen encapsulated cigarette butts in stone mastic asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 261, 120530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahman, M. T., & Mohajerani, A. (2020). Recycling waste cigarette butts in dense graded asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 13(7), 1495.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kolychev, B. S., Kulichenko, V., Khonikevich, A., & Sedov, V. (1969). Inclusion of radioactive waste in bitumen. Journal of Atomic Energy, 26, 613–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ojovan, M. I., Lee, W. E., & Kalmykov, S. N. (2019). Immobilisation of radioactive waste in bitumen. In: An introduction to nuclear waste immobilization. Elsevier.

  35. Hunter, R. N., Self, A., Read, J., Gerlis, R., Taylor, R., & Hobson, E. (2015). The shell bitumen handbook (6th ed.). ICE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ensyclopaedia Britannica. (2019). Paraffin wax. Chemical products. https://www.britannica.com/science/paraffin-wax. Accessed on 14 March 2020.

  37. Roy Choudhury, A. (2017). 11—Finishes for protection against microbial, insect and UV radiation. Principles of textile finishing (pp. 319–382). Woodhead Publishing.

  38. Standards Australia. (2019). Wastes, sediments and contaminated soils. Part 3: preparation of leachates-bottle leaching procedure (ABLP) (AS4439.3). SAI Global Limited.

  39. USEPA. (2017). Method 1313: Liquid-solid partitioning as a function of extract pH using a parallel batch extraction procedure. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  40. Australian Government (2020). National drinking water guidelines 6. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/reports/aust-drinking-water-guidelines.pdf. Accessed on 4 October 2020.

  41. Industrial waste resource guidelines, solid industrial waste hazard categorization and management, E.P.A. Victoria (2009). file:///C:/Users/s3432918/Downloads/IWRG631.pdf. Accessed on 12 April 2020.

  42. Noferini, L., Simone, A., Sangiorgi, C., & Mazzotta, F. (2017). Investigation on performances of asphalt mixtures made with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement: Effects of interaction between virgin and RAP bitumen. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10, 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bindu, C., Joseph, M. S., Sibinesh, P., George, S., & Sivan, S. (2020). Performance evaluation of warm mix asphalt using natural rubber modified bitumen and cashew nut shell liquid. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13, 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Farina, A., Kutay, M. E., & Lanotte, M. (2021). Laboratory and field performance investigation of pre-swollen crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14, 513–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hon, N. S. (1977). Photodegradation of cellulose acetate fibers. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 15, 725–744.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Standards Australia. (2013). Bitumen for pavements (AS2008). SAI Global Limited.

  47. Puma Bitumen. (2016). Polymer modified binder. https://www.pumabitumen.com.au/assets/Products/Puma-Bitumen-OLEXOBIT-AB6.pdf. Accessed on 25 April 2020.

  48. Standards Australia. (2000). Methods for sampling and testing aggregates particle density and water absorption of coarse aggregate—Weighing-in-water method (AS1141.6.1). SAI Global Limited.

  49. ASTM C127-01. (1993). Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM International.

  50. Airey, G. D., Rahman, M. M., & Collop, A. C. (2003). Absorption of bitumen into crumb rubber using the basket drainage method. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hunter, R. N., Self, A., Read, J., & Hobson, E. (2015). The shell bitumen handbook. ICE Publishing. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bA1tIkRJL8kC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=The+shell+bitumen+handbook&ots=peNfJoCZVR&sig=toMCtvdgciSq96fQvT76L_wwixI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The%20shell%20bitumen%20handbook&f=false. Accessed on 5 October 2020.

  52. Du Plessis, A., Olawuyi, B. J., Boshoff, W. P., & Le Roux, S. G. (2016). Simple and fast porosity analysis of concrete using X-ray computed tomography. Materials and Structures, 49, 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of an ongoing postgraduate study on recycling cigarette butts in construction materials. The authors would like to thank Butt-Out Australia Pty Ltd, RMIT University, and the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship for their financial and in-kind support.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Abbas Mohajerani, Halenur Kurmus, Md Tareq Rahman, John V. Smith, Sum Samuel Woo, Daniel Jones, Mostafa Ghafouri Dastjerdi, Jake Pulitano, Bao Tach Nguyen & Claudio Calderón

Authors
  1. Abbas Mohajerani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Halenur Kurmus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md Tareq Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John V. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sum Samuel Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mostafa Ghafouri Dastjerdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jake Pulitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bao Tach Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Claudio Calderón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halenur Kurmus.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohajerani, A., Kurmus, H., Rahman, M.T. et al. Bitumen and Paraffin Wax Encapsulated Cigarette Butts: Physical Properties and Leachate Analysis. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 15, 931–947 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00063-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00063-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation