Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Vehicle Speed Effect on Continuous Pavement Surface Deflection Measurements

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pavement structural condition assessment is an integral part of pavement evaluation and rehabilitation strategies. For years, the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) has been the preferred device to assess pavement structural condition to optimize treatment options at the project level. However, the use of FWD is inefficient for network-level applications because of its limitations, such as traffic disruption, safety issues, and low rate of data collections. Recently, continuous deflection testing devices, such as the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) have been gaining worldwide consideration for structural evaluation of in-service pavement sections at the network level. The data collection rate of continuous measurement testing devices is significantly higher than traditional stationary devices and is collected at or close to traffic speed. Hence, highway agencies have shown significant interest in the use of these devices at the network level to identify structurally marginal pavement sections. However, the procedure is less than clear cut. One of the missing links is that the pavement responses under moving loads are speed-dependent due to the viscoelastic behavior of asphalt layers. Therefore, the continuous pavement measurements have to be adjusted for the vehicle speeds to assess consistent and comparable measurements over the pavement sections. In this study, a database of 1512 dynamic viscoelastic analyses of various pavement structures under different TSD loading speeds was developed to investigate the effect of vehicle speeds on measured surface deflections. A speed adjustment model for the surface curvature index (SCITSD), the most commonly used TSD index, is proposed to facilitate the use of TSD measurements for structural assessment of pavement sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nasimifar, M., Thyagarajan, S., & Sivaneswaran, N. (2018). Computation of pavement vertical surface deflections from traffic speed deflectometer data: Evaluation of current methods. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144(1), 04018001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rada, G., Nazarian, S., Visintine, B., Siddharthan, R. V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2016). Pavement structural evaluation at the network level. FHWA-DTFH61-12-C-00031, FHWA, US Department of Transportation.

  3. Deng, Y., Luo, X., Gu, F., Zhang, Y., & Lytton, R. L. (2019). 3D simulation of deflection basin of pavements under high-speed moving loads. Construction and Building Materials, 226, 868–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sebaaly, P. E., & Tabatabaee, N. (1993). Influence of vehicle speed on dynamic loads and pavement response. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1410, 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanttu, K. (2007). Speed and reloading effects on pavement rutting. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 160(3), 123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mshali, M. R. S., & Steyn, W. J. (2019). Incorporating truck speed effect on evaluation and design of flexible pavement systems. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13(1), 55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ARA Inc. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Final Report NCHRP 1-37A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., USA.

  8. Levenberg, E. (2013). Inverse analysis of viscoelastic pavement properties using data from embedded instrumentation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 37, 1016–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levenberg, E. (2016). Viscoelastic pavement modeling with a spreadsheet. In Eighth International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements. Research Publishing Services.

  10. Smith, T. L. (1971). Empirical equations for representing viscoelastic functions and for deriving spectra. Journal of Polymer Science Part C: Polymer Symposia, 35(1), 39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Siddharthan, R. V., Yao, J., & Sebaaly, P. E. (1998). Pavement strain from moving dynamic 3-D load distribution. J. Transportation Engineering. ASCE, 124(6), 557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Siddharthan, R. V., Krishnamenon, N., & Sebaaly, P. E. (2000). Pavement response evaluation using finite-layer approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1709, 43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nasimifar, M., Siddharthan, R. V., Rada, G. R., & Nazarian, S. (2015). Dynamic analyses of traffic speed deflection devices. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(5), 381.74-390.74

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Cauwelaert, F. J., Alexander, D. R., White, T. D., & Barker, W. R. (1989). Multilayer elastic program for backcalculating layer moduli in pavement evaluation. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, Baltimore, Md., pp. 171–188.

  15. Habbouche, J., Hajj, E. Y., Sebaaly, P. E., & Morian, N. E. (2018). Damage assessment for ME rehabilitation design of modified asphalt pavements: challenges and findings. Transportation Research Record, 2672(40), 228–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, Y. R., Underwood, B., Sakhaei Far, M., Jackson, N., & Puccinelli, J. (2011). LTPP computed parameter: dynamic modulus. Publication FHWA-HRT-10-035, FHWA, US Department of Transportation.

  17. Loulizi, A., Flintsch, G., & McGhee, K. (2007). Determination of in-place hot-mix asphalt layer modulus for rehabilitation projects by a mechanistic-empirical procedure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2037, 53–62 Washington, DC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park, S. W., & Schapery, R. A. (1999). Methods of interconversion between linear viscoelastic material functions. Part I—A numerical method based on Prony series. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 36(1), 1653–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nasimifar, M., Thyagarajan, S., & Sivaneswaran, N. (2017). Backcalculation of flexible pavement layer moduli from traffic speed deflectometer data. Transportation Research Record, 2641(1), 66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horak, E. (2008). Benchmarking the structural condition of flexible pavements with deflection bowl parameters. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 50(2), 2–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nasimifar, M., Chaudhari, S., Thyagarajan, S., & Sivaneswaran, N. (2018). Temperature adjustment of Surface Curvature Index from traffic speed deflectometer measurements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Nasimifar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasimifar, M., Shojaee, M. Evaluation of Vehicle Speed Effect on Continuous Pavement Surface Deflection Measurements. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 15, 184–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00017-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00017-1

Keywords

Navigation