Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business Analytics Adoption in Firms: A Qualitative Study Elaborating TOE Framework in India

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adoption of business analytics (BA) in emerging countries, such as India is growing significantly over the last few years. However, the research on technological capabilities and BA adoption is scant in the context of emerging countries. There is a need to understand the capabilities needed for managing BA technology in organizations in India. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors influencing BA adoption in firms in India. The study is based on the TOE (technological, organizational, environmental) framework in combination with perceived benefits of BA adoption. The study uses thematic content analysis of the primary data collected through semi-structured interviews from senior management personnel’s in organizations. Some of the major factors validated from this study are perceived benefits, organizational data environment, technology assets, and competitive pressure. The study finds data quality and human resources competency with BA skills as specific challenges for organizations in India. The findings of this study can be useful for the organizations to develop their BA practices to differentiate from the competition. This study contributes to the existing knowledge on BA adoption and would facilitate future researches on higher level BA capabilities on the elements of management of technology (MoT) framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2013). Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: A multi-perspective framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(3), 250–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analytics Report. (2018). https://peepalconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Analytics-Report-2018.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braganza, A., Brooks, L., Nepelski, D., Ali, M., & Moro, R. (2017). Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 328–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Nath, R. (2018). Business analytics maturity of firms: an examination of the relationships between managerial perception of IT, business analytics maturity and success. Information Systems Management, 35(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. Q., Preston, D. S., & Swink, M. (2015). How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 4–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, T., Diehl, G., Karson, E., Liberatore, M., Luo, W., Nydick, R., et al. (2010). The current state of analytics in the corporation: The view from industry leaders. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), 1(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côrte-Real, N., Oliveira, T., & Ruivo, P. (2017). Assessing business value of big data analytics in European firms. Journal of Business Research, 70, 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangayach, G. S., Pathak, S. C., & Sharma, A. D. (2006). Advanced manufacturing technology: A way of improving technological competitiveness. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 2(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (2006). Competing on analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Dean, J. W., Jr., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.5465/256784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delen, D., & Ram, S. (2018). Research challenges and opportunities in business analytics. Journal of Business Analytics, 1(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2018.1507324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Wamba, S. F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84(1–4), 631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, D., & Bose, I. (2015). Managing a big data project: the case of ramco cements limited. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, S., Fukawa, N., & Swayne, L. (2016). Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 897–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, J., & Curto, J. (2013). A risk and benefits behavioral model to assess intentions to adopt big data: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: ICICKM 2013.

  • EY says Indian firms are more analytics savvy. (2017). https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/ey-says-indian-firms-are-more-analytics-savvy/articleshow/59249212.cms.

  • Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, C. S., Cody, P. A., & Ballan, M. (2010). The handbook of social work research methods B. Thyer. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaardboe, R., & Svarre, T. (2018). business intelligence success factors: A literature review. Journal of Information Technology Management, 29(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar, H. (2018). Understanding the determinants of big data adoption in India: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information Resources Management Journal, 31(4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar, H., & Date, H. (2016). Critical factors of cloud computing adoption in organizations: An empirical study. Global Business Review, 17(4), 886–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardas, B. B., Mangla, S. K., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B., & Luthra, S. (2019). Green talent management to unlock sustainability in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 850–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemaghaei, M., Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, S., & Stevens, K. (2000). An analysis of the business characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of world wide web technology. Information Technology and Management, 1(1–2), 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. F., Ray, S., & Li-Hsieh, Y. Y. (2014). Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model. International Journal of Information Management, 34(4), 474–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19, 465–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, T. (2000). Management of Technology. The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257–270). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., & Shockley, R. (2011). Creating business value with analytics. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(1), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, T., Schlaefke, M., & Moeller, K. (2011). Integrating business analytics into strategic planning for better performance. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(6), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information and Management, 38(8), 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O., Lee, N., & Shin, B. (2014). Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrinidis, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2012). Challenges and opportunities with big data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 5(12), 2032–2033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y., Sun, H., & Ren, J. (2018). Understanding the determinants of big data analytics (BDA) adoption in logistics and supply chain management: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(2), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavalle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. H., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wirjanto, T. S. (2011). Path dependence of dynamic information technology capability: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 45–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, M. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1991). The influence of a convergence in understanding between technology providers and users on information technology innovativeness. Organization Science, 2(2), 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., Mueck, S., & Shockley, R. (2015). How leading organizations use big data and analytics to innovate. Strategy & Leadership, 43(5), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-06-2015-0054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, S. K. (2012). Adoption of business intelligence systems in Indian fashion retail. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 9(3), 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaya, K. (2001). International competitiveness: Evaluation and enhancement (1st ed.). New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaya, K.S. (2017). Management of Technology and Innovation (MOT) for Competitiveness: Diagnosing Problems at Vonda Motors. Case Centre No. 318-0001-1. https://www.thecasecentre.org/main/products/view?id=149299. Accessed 20 May 2020.

  • Momaya, K. S. (2019). The past and the future of competitiveness research: A review in an emerging context of innovation and EMNEs. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-019-00002-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momaya, K., & Ajitabh, A. (2005). Technology management and competitiveness: Is there any relationship? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 4(4), 518–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momaya, K. S., & Lalwani, L. (2017). Systems of technological innovation: A review of research activities taking the case of nanotechnology and India. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 29(6), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1220516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musawa, M. S., & Wahab, E. (2012). The adoption of electronic data interchange (EDI) technology by nigerian smes: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Management and Economics, 3(2), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, D., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2019). Business analytics adoption process: An innovation diffusion perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narwane, V. S., Raut, R. D., Gardas, B. B., Kavre, M. S., & Narkhede, B. E. (2019a). Factors affecting the adoption of cloud of things: The case study of Indian small and medium enterprises. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(4), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-10-2018-0137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narwane, V. S., Narkhede, B. E., Gardas, B. B., & Raut, R. D. (2019b). Cloud manufacturing issues and its adoption: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 12(2), 168–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2019.099319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, S. (2005). The development, change, and transformation of management information systems (MIS): A thematic content analysis of articles published in business and marketing journals. International journal of information management, 25(5), 442–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2019). Integrating wearable technology products and big data analytics in business strategy: A study of health insurance firms. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-08-2018-0109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information and Management, 51(5), 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchal, D., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2019). Developing an instrument for business model dimensions: exploring linkages with firm competitiveness. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 14(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-019-00004-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Q. M. (1999). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, N., & Daniel, B. K. (2006). Social network and content analysis of interactions in a video-mediated virtual community: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 901–903).

  • Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2012). Towards business intelligence systems success: Effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision making. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 729–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–8078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puklavec, B., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2018). Understanding the determinants of business intelligence system adoption stages. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 118(1), 236–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, F. K. (2004). The analysis of qualitative data. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raguseo, E. (2018). Big data technologies: An empirical investigation on their adoption, benefits and risks for companies. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy, K. R., Sen, A., & Sinha, A. P. (2008). An empirical investigation of the key determinants of data warehouse adoption. Decision Support Systems, 44(4), 817–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R., Duan, Y., Cao, G., & Philpott, E. (2012). World academy of science, engineering and technology. Energy and Power Engineering, 69, 855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R., Philpott, E., Duan, Y., & Cao, G. (2017). Adoption of business analytics and impact on performance: a qualitative study in retail. Production Planning and Control, 28(11–12), 985–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raut, R. D., Gardas, B. B., Narkhede, B. E., & Narwane, V. S. (2019). To investigate the determinants of cloud computing adoption in the manufacturing micro, small and medium enterprises: A DEMATEL-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(3), 990–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., & Bilodeau, B. (2015). Management tools and trends 2015. Boston: Bain & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblum, R., Jang, Y., Zimlichman, E., Salzberg, C., Tamblyn, M., Buckeridge, D., et al. (2011). A qualitative study of Canada’s experience with the implementation of electronic health information technology. CMAJ, 183(5), E281–E288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, T., Banwet, D. K., & Momaya, K. (2010). Strategic technology management in practice: Dynamic SAP-LAP analysis of an auto component manufacturing firm in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1–2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, T., Banwet, D. K., & Momaya, K. (2011). Strategic technology management practices in select auto component joint ventures in India: A case study using SAP-LAP methodology. International Journal of Engineering Management and Economics, 2(2–3), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEME.2011.041994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salian, S., Bali, A., Yugandhar, V., & Momaya, K. S. (2018). Analyzing the role of management of technology in the growth of technology ventures. In S. T. Sushil & A. Kulkarni (Eds.), Flexibility in resource management. Flexible Systems Management. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9640-3_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Santa, R., Ferrer, M., Bretherton, P., & Hyland, P. (2009). The necessary alignment between technology innovation effectiveness and operational effectiveness. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business studies (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011). Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shee, H., VanGramberg, B., & Foley, P. (2011). Capability and practices to enhance firm competitiveness under competitive intensity: A SEM approach. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 6(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrotriya, S., Dhir, S., & Sushil. (2018). Innovation driven ecosystem for quality skill development in India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(8), 2997–3020. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2017-0320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S. K., & Sushil, P. K. (2020). Generic flexibility evaluation model. In P. Suri & R. Yadav (Eds.), Transforming organizations through flexible systems management: flexible systems management. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4888-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S., Cegielski, C. G., Jia, L., & Hall, D. J. (2018). Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, S., & Garg, S. (2019). Internationalization of Tata Motors: Strategic analysis using flowing stream strategy process. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 14(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-019-00006-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon, P. P., & Kraemer, K. L. (2007). Fact or fiction? A sensemaking perspective on the reality behind executives' perceptions of IT business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 13–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • US National Research Council. (1987). Management of technology the hidden competitive advantage. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2017). Perceived strategic value-based adoption of big data analytics in emerging economy: A qualitative approach for Indian firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), 354–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidgen, R., Shaw, S., & Grant, D. B. (2017). Management challenges in creating value from business analytics. European Journal of Operational Research, 261(2), 626–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Byrd, T. A. (2017). Business analytics-enabled decision-making effectiveness through knowledge absorptive capacity in health care. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2015-0301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Cheung, W. (2004). E-business adoption by travel agencies: Prime candidates for mobile e-business. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., Wang, Y. S., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwide Semiannual Big Data and Analytics Spending Guide. (2019). https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190404005662/en/IDC-Forecasts-Revenues-Big-Data-Business-Analytics. Accessed 3 June 2019.

  • Xavier, M. J., Srinivasan, A., & Thamizhvanan, A. (2011). Use of analytics in Indian enterprises: An exploratory study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3(3), 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, W., Moon, H., & Lee, Y. W. (2019). The success factors of Korean Global start-ups in the digital sectors through internationalization. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 14(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-019-00003-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Kraemer, K. L. (2006). Innovation diffusion in global contexts: Determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for providing valuable comments for the development of this research paper. The authors are also thankful to the senior executives who provided with the valuable inputs as part of the interview for this study.

Funding

We did not receive any funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Management, NMIMS, V.L Mehta Road, Ville Parle West, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400056, India

    Amit Kumar & Bala Krishnamoorthy

Authors
  1. Amit Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bala Krishnamoorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interests with this study. All the primary data used in this study are collected by the researchers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Krishnamoorthy, B. Business Analytics Adoption in Firms: A Qualitative Study Elaborating TOE Framework in India. JGBC 15, 80–93 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-020-00013-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-020-00013-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation