Skip to main content
Log in

Deadbeat Indirect Torque Control of Switched Reluctance Motors with Current Vector Decomposition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an improved deadbeat indirect torque control (ITC) method for switched reluctance motors (SRMs) with the primary goal of reducing torque ripple. The proposed control approach comprises two parts: a torque-to-current conversion scheme that the proposed method achieves excellent current and a deadbeat controller (DBC). In the conversion scheme, a second-order SRM Fourier-series model is constructed by integrating the current vector decomposition method. Subsequently, an iterative learning controller (ILC) is designed based on this model to achieve precise conversion from the electromagnetic torque to the q-axis current, which eliminates the need for additional modeling processes. Within the proposed DBC controller, a novel recursive least squares (RLS) estimator is introduced to effectively tackle the issue of model variations. This integration enables the adaptive calibration of the predictive model, ultimately guaranteeing optimal performance in the current control. Furthermore, the consistency of the model employed in both the DBC and conversion scheme empowers the RLS to further refine the accuracy of torque-to-current conversion, thereby improving torque ripple suppression performance. Comparative experiments are conducted on a 12/8 SRM to evaluate the proposed control method’s performance. The experimental results show that the proposed method achieves excellent current tracking and torque ripple suppression performance in SRM drives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References  

  1. Ahn J-W, Lukman GF (2018) Switched reluctance motor: Research trends and overview. CES Trans Electr Mach Syst 2(4):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bostanci E, Moallem M, Parsapour A, Fahimi B (2017) Opportunities and Challenges of Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for Electric Propulsion: A Comparative Study. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification 3(1):58–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J, Wang G, Liu D, Fan Y (2023) An Improved Deadbeat Control Scheme for Unipolar Sinusoidal Current Excited Switched Reluctance Motor Drives. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 11(2):1589–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun Q, Wu J, Gan C, Si J, Guo J, Hu Y (2019) Cascaded Multiport Converter for SRM-Based Hybrid Electrical Vehicle Applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron 34(12):11940–11951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng L et al (2020) Direct Torque Control with Variable Flux for an SRM Based on Hybrid Optimization Algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Electron 37(6):6688–6697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sozer Y, Husain I, Torrey DA (2015) Guidance in selecting advanced control techniques for switched reluctance machine drives in emerging applications. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 51(6):4505–4514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inderka RB, De Doncker RW (2003) DITC-direct instantaneous torque control of switched reluctance drives. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 39(4):1046–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Q, Jianhua Wu, Gan C (2020) Optimized direct instantaneous torque control for SRMs with efficiency improvement. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 68(3):2072–2082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahoo SK, Panda SK, Jian-Xin Xu (2005) Indirect torque control of switched reluctance motors using iterative learning control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 20(3):200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang G, Scalcon FP, Xiao D, Vieira RP, Grundling HA, Emadi A (2021) Advanced Control of Switched Reluctance Motors (SRMs): A Review on Current Regulation, Torque Control and Vibration Suppression. IEEE Open J Ind Electron Soc 2:280–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamouda M, Sz´amel L, Alquraan L (2019) Maximum Torque per Ampere based Indirect Instantaneous Torque Control for Switched Reluctance Motor. In: 2019 International IEEE Conference and Workshop in Obuda on Electrical and Power Engineering (CANDO-EPE). IEEE, Budapest, Hungary. pp 47–54

  12. Li H, Bilgin B, Emadi A (2018) An improved torque sharing function for torque ripple reduction in switched reluctance machines. IEEE Trans Power Electron 34(2):1635–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Song S et al (2020) Model predictive control of switched reluctance starter/generator with torque sharing and compensation. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification 6(4):1519–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ye J, Bilgin B, Emadi A (2015) An Extended-Speed Low-Ripple Torque Control of Switched Reluctance Motor Drives. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(3):1457–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee D-H et al (2009) A simple nonlinear logical torque sharing function for low-torque ripple SR drive. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 56(8):3021–3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kandhasamy S (2020) Machine learning based SRM control using FPGAs for torque ripple minimization. In: 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC). IEEE, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 675–680

  17. Yao X et al (2010) High-performance torque control for switched reluctance motor based on online fuzzy neural network modeling. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application, vol 1. IEEE, Changsha, China, pp 817–822

  18. Li C, Qinjun Du, Liu X (2022) Indirect predictive torque control for switched reluctance motor in EV application. Energy Rep 8:857–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Husain I, Ehsani M (1996) Torque ripple minimization in switched reluctance motor drives by PWM current control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 11(1):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz SE, Rahman KM (2003) High-performance digital PI current regulator for EV switched reluctance motor drives. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 39(4):1118–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurian S, Nisha GK (2022) Torque ripple minimization of SRM using sliding-mode current controller and torque-sharing function. In: Power Electronics and High Voltage in Smart Grid: Select Proceedings of SGESC 2021. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp. 339–351

  22. Valencia DF et al (2020) A review of predictive control techniques for switched reluctance machine drives. Part I: Fundamentals and current control. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 36(2):1313–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikail R et al (2014) A fixed switching frequency predictive current control method for switched reluctance ma- chines. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 50(6):3717–3726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta S, Pramod P, Husain I (2019) Analysis of dynamic current control techniques for switched reluctance motor drives for high performance applications. In: 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). IEEE, Detroit, MI, USA, pp 1–7

  25. Peng F, Ye J, Emadi A (2015) A digital PWM current controller for switched reluctance motor drives. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(10):7087–7098

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang X et al (2019) A switched reluctance motor torque ripple reduction strategy with deadbeat current control and active thermal management. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 69(1):317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuai S et al (2020) Low-torque ripple control of SRM based on current vector. IET Electric Power Appl 14(4):723–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Xin, Shamsi P et al (2016) Model Predictive Current Control of Switched Reluctance Motors With Inductance Auto-Calibration. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(6):3934–3941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chi H-P, Lin R-L, Chen J-F (2005) Simplified flux- linkage model for switched-reluctance motors. IEE Proc-Electr Power Appl 152(3):577–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vujičić VP (2011) Minimization of torque ripple and copper losses in switched reluctance drive. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(1):388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2022YFB4301401, and in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61976 033, and by the Cultivation Program for the Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Dalian Maritime University under Grant 0034012313.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunsheng Fan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

When the \({\theta }_{e}\) falls within the interval \([-\pi /2,\pi /6]\), indicating that the vector iq in Sector I, the decomposed phase currents are as follows:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} i_{a} = i_{q} \sin (\pi /6 - \theta_{e} )/\sin (\pi /3) \hfill \\ i_{b} = i_{q} \cos (\theta_{e} )/\sin (\pi /3) \hfill \\ i_{c} = 0 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(A.1)

Substituting (1) and (33) to (2), the torque equation in Sector I can be derived as:

$$\begin{gathered} T_{e} = \frac{{N_{r} }}{6}i_{q}^{2} [l_{1} (\sin 3\theta_{e} + 4\sin (\theta_{e} + 2\pi /3) \\ + 4l_{2} (\sin (2\theta_{e} - 2\pi /3) - \sin (4\theta_{e} - 4\pi /3)] \\ \end{gathered}$$
(A.2)

When the \({\theta }_{e}\) falls within the interval \([5\pi /\mathrm{6,3}\pi /2]\), indicating that the vector iq in Sector I, the decomposed phase currents are as follows: the relationship between the phase currents and the q-axis current can be expressed as:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} i_{a} = - i_{q} \cos (\theta_{e} )/\sin (\pi /3) \hfill \\ i_{b} = 0 \hfill \\ i_{c} = i_{q} \sin (\theta_{e} - 5\pi /3)/\sin (\pi /3) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(A.3)

The torque equation in Sector III is

$$\begin{gathered} T_{e} = \frac{{N_{r} }}{6}i_{q}^{2} [l_{1} (\sin 3\theta_{e} + 4\sin (\theta_{e} - \pi /3) \\ + 4l_{2} (\sin (2\theta_{e} + \pi /3) - \sin (4\theta_{e} + 4\pi /3)] \\ \end{gathered}$$
(A.4)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, D., Fan, Y., Liu, J. et al. Deadbeat Indirect Torque Control of Switched Reluctance Motors with Current Vector Decomposition. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-024-01891-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-024-01891-y

Keywords

Navigation