Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Novel Context-Aware Computing Framework with the Internet of Things and Prediction of Sensor Rank Using Random Neural XG-Boost Algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The amount of sensors being used worldwide is gradually increasing as the Internet of Things (IoT) draws closer. According to market data, sensor deployments have grown significantly over the last decade, and the pace of expansion is expected to accelerate. Massive amounts of information are being produced by these sensors continually. However, before we can add value to raw sensor data, we must first comprehend it. This challenge involves gathering, modeling, interpreting, and communicating sensor data context. In sensor data analysis, context-aware computation has been proven successful. Relevance is defined by the user's job when a system uses context to provide necessary details and resources to a user. In this paper, we propose a novel IoT context-aware system for predicting the rank of sensors based on context data. Fuzzy Logic-based Contextual Defensible Reasoning (FL-CDR) is presentedusing Random Neural XG-Boost Algorithm to Predict Sensor Rank in a Novel Context-Aware Computing Framework with the Internet of Things.The proposed is proved effective in ranking the sensors based on the context data. Using the XGBoost algorithm achieves the maximum accuracy by 97.03% and the lowest latency by 15%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Dobrescu R, Merezeanu D, Mocanu S (2019) Context-aware control and monitoring system with IoT and cloud support. Comput Electron Agric 160:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morais CMD, Sadok D, Kelner J (2019) An IoT sensor and scenario survey for data researchers. J Braz Comput Soc 25(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shamshiri RR, Bojic I, van Henten E, Balasundram SK, Dworak V, Sultan M, Weltzien C (2020) Model-based evaluation of greenhouse microclimate using IoT-Sensor data fusion for energy-efficient crop production. J Clean Prod 263:121303

    Google Scholar 

  4. AbbasianDehkordi S, Farajzadeh K, Rezazadeh J, Farahbakhsh R, Sandrasegaran K, AbbasianDehkordi M (2020) A survey on data aggregation techniques in IoT sensor networks. Wirel Netw 26(2):1243–1263

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baloch Z, Shaikh FK, Unar MA (2018) A context-aware data fusion approach for health-IoT. Int J Inf Technol 10(3):241–245

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harikrishnan G, Rajaram A (2017) Improved throughput based recognition connection denies for aggressive node in wireless sensor network. J Comput Theor Nanosci 14(12):5748–5755

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anitha B, Rajaram A (2014) Efficient position based packet forwarding protocol for wireless sensor networks. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 69(2):297

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Turjman F, Lemayian JP (2020) Intelligence, security, and vehicular sensor networks in the Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled smart-cities: an overview. Comput Electr Eng 87:106776

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kertiou I, Benharzallah S, Kahloul L, Beggas M, Euler R, Laouid A, Bounceur A (2018) A dynamic skyline technique for a context-aware selection of the best sensors in IoT architecture. Ad Hoc Netw 81:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deebak BD, Al-Turjman F, Aloqaily M, Alfandi O (2020) IoT-BSFCAN: a smart context-aware system in IoT-Cloud using mobile fogging. Futur Gener Comput Syst 109:368–381

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmud R, Toosi AN, Ramamohanarao K, Buyya R (2019) Context-aware placement of industry 4.0 applications in fog computing environments. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 16(11):7004–7013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sakib S, Fouda MM, Fadlullah ZM, Nasser N, Alasmary W (2021) A proof-of-concept of ultra-edge smart IoT sensor: a continuous and lightweight arrhythmia monitoring approach. IEEE Access 9:26093–26106

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deebak BD, Al-Turjman F (2020) A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in IoT-based wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 97:102022

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muthu B, Sivaparthipan CB, Manogaran G, Sundarasekar R, Kadry S, Shanthini A, Da Sel A (2020) IOT-based wearable sensor for disease prediction and symptom analysis in the healthcare sector. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 13(6):2123–2134

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thangaramya K, Kulothungan K, Logambigai R, Selvi M, Ganapathy S, Kannan A (2019) Energy-aware cluster and neuro-fuzzy based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks in IoT. Comput Netw 151:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fotovvat A, Rahman GM, Vedaei SS, Wahid KA (2020) Comparative performance analysis of lightweight cryptography algorithms for IoT sensor nodes. IEEE Internet Things J 8(10):8279–8290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plageras AP, Psannis KE, Stergiou C, Wang H, Gupta BB (2018) Efficient IoT-based sensor BIG Data collection–processing and analysis in smart buildings. Futur Gener Comput Syst 82:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu M, Yi Z, Yang B, Lee C (2021) Using nano energy from humans–Nanogenerator and self-powered sensor enabled sustainable wireless IoT sensory systems. Nano Today 36:101016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adeel A, Gogate M, Farooq S, Ieracitano C, Dashtipour K, Larijani H, Hussain A (2019) A survey on the role of wireless sensor networks and IoT in disaster management. In: Geological disaster monitoring based on sensor networks, Springer, Singapore, pp 57–66.

  20. Wu T, Wu F, Qiu C, Redouté JM, Yuce MR (2020) A rigid-flex wearable health monitoring sensor patch for IoT-connected healthcare applications. IEEE Internet Things J 7(8):6932–6945

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao Z, Fang H, Wang X (2020) Nonlinear polynomial graph filter for anomalous IoT sensor detection and localization. IEEE Internet Things J 7(6):4839–4848

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bibi SE (2018) The IoT for smart, sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain Cities Soc 38:230–253

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rani S, Ahmed SH, Rastogi R (2020) Dynamic clustering approach based on wireless sensor networks genetic algorithm for IoT applications. Wirel Netw 26(4):2307–2316

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hamidouche R, Aliouat Z, Gueroui AM, Ari AAA, Louail L (2018) Classical and bio-inspired mobility in sensor networks for IoT applications. J Netw Comput Appl 121:70–88

    Google Scholar 

  25. Costa FS, Nassar SM, Dantas MA (2021) GoAT: a sensor ranking approach for IoT environments. In: CLOSER, pp 169–177

  26. Safaei M, Ismail AS, Chisari H, Driss M, Bonilla W, Asadi S, Safaei M (2020) Standalone noise and anomaly detection in wireless sensor networks: a novel time-series and adaptive Bayesian-network-based approach. Softw Pract Exp 50(4):428–446

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khan J, Li JP, Ahamad B, Parveen S, Haq AU, Khan GA, Sangaiah AK (2020) SMSH: Secure surveillance mechanism on smart healthcare IoT system with probabilistic image encryption. IEEE Access 8:15747–15767

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khan J, Li JP, Haq AU, Khan GA, Ahmad S, Abdullah Alghamdi A, Golilarz NA (2021) Efficient, secure surveillance on smart healthcare IoT systems through cosine-transform encryption. J Intel Fuzzy Syst 40(1):1417–1442

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khan J, Khan GA, Li JP, AlAjmi MF, Haq AU, Khan S, Ahmad N, Parveen S, Shahid M, Ahmad S, Raji M (2022) Secure smart healthcare monitoring in industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) ecosystem with cosine function hybrid chaotic map encryption. Sci Program. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8853448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasheminejad E, Barati H (2021) A reliable tree-based data aggregation method in wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 14:873–887

    Google Scholar 

  31. Akbari MR, Barati H, Barati A (2022) An efficient gray system theory-based routing protocol for energy consumption management in the Internet of Things using fog and cloud computing. Computing 104(6):1307–1335

    Google Scholar 

  32. Naghibi M, Barati H (2021) SHSDA: secure hybrid structure data aggregation method in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 12(12):10769–10788

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hatamian M, Barati H, Movaghar A, Naghizadeh A (2016) CGC: centralized genetic-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks using the onion approach. Telecommun Syst 62:657–674

    Google Scholar 

  34. Akbari MR, Barati H, Barati A (2022) An overlapping routing approach for sending data from things to the cloud inspired by fog technology in the large-scale IoT ecosystem. Wirel Netw 28(2):521–538

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hong S (2020) P2P networking-based Internet of Things (IoT) sensor node authentication by Blockchain. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 13(2):579–589

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gu X, Grauwin L, Dousset D, Hemour S, Wu K (2021) Dynamic ambient RF energy density measurements of montreal for battery-free IoT sensor network planning. IEEE Internet Things J 8(17):13209–13221

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kertiou I, Benharzallah S, Kahloul L, Beggas M, Euler R, Laouid A, Bounceur A (2018) A dynamic skyline technique for a context-aware selection of the best sensors in an IoT architecture. Ad Hoc Netw 81:183–196

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is no acknowledgement involved in this work.

Funding

No funding is involved in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anna University Regional Campus, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641046, India

    Manokaran Newlin Rajkumar

  2. Mahendra Engineering College, Tiruchengode, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, 637503, India

    Rajamurugan Anbuchelvan

Authors
  1. Manokaran Newlin Rajkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajamurugan Anbuchelvan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors are contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajamurugan Anbuchelvan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate:

No participation of humans takes place in this implementation process.

Human and Animal Rights

No violation of Human and Animal Rights is involved.

Conflict of interest

Conflict of Interest is not applicable in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajkumar, M.N., Anbuchelvan, R. A Novel Context-Aware Computing Framework with the Internet of Things and Prediction of Sensor Rank Using Random Neural XG-Boost Algorithm. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 19, 2621–2636 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01746-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01746-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation