Abstract
As efforts to improve awareness and prevention of sexual assault increase, the importance of a workable definition of sexual consent becomes apparent. Affirmative sexual consent, often summarized as “yes means yes,” has been adopted by sexual assault prevention activists and much of popular culture, whereas legal policy and scientific pursuits seem to lag behind. For example, despite its importance for not only the prevention of sexual assault but also the facilitation of satisfying and meaningful relationships, affirmative sexual consent has not been subjected to a conceptual behavioral analysis. This article offers a behavioral conceptualization of affirmative sexual consent with specific implications for how consent is defined, what behaviors compose the response class of consent, and what contexts control those behaviors. Specifically, we propose that affirmative sexual consent as a functional response class involves tact–mand combinations of appetitive contingencies under appetitive control, shifting with the changing context. Action implications are provided for defining affirmative sexual consent, identifying the target behaviors that compose it, and setting the context for training those behaviors. It is our hope that this functional approach to affirmative sexual consent might provide a preliminary foundation for empirical and applied pursuits to move beyond “yes means yes.”
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
05 January 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00088-6
References
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 830.
Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., & McAuslan, P. (2000). Alcohol’s effects on sexual perception. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(5), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.688.
Allen Law Firm. (2019). The ABA just rejected “affirmative consent” rules for sexual assault. https://allen-lawfirm.com/2019/08/19/aba-rejected-affirmative-consent-rules-for-sexual-assault/
Antioch College. (2018). Sexual offense prevention policy (SOPP) and Title IX. https://antiochcollege.edu/campus-life/sexual-offense-prevention-policy-title-ix/
Attell, D., & Wilson, D. et al., (1993). Is it date rape? (Season 19, Episode 2) [TV series episode]. In L. Michaels (Executive Producer), Saturday Night Live. NBC Studios.
Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2013). Ethics for behavior analysts. Routledge.
Barnes-Holmes, D., O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., & Lyddy, F. (2002). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, and B. Roche (Eds.) Relational frame theory (pp. 103–117). Springer.
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95.
Baum, W. M. (2003). The molar view of behavior and its usefulness in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4(1), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100009.
Blue Seat Studios. (2015). Tea consent [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZwvrxVavnQ
Bullough, V. L. (1976). Sexual variance in society and history. John Wiley & Sons.
Burke, T. (2020). History & inception. The “Me Too.” Movement. https://metoomvmt.org/get-to-know-us/history-inception/
Callister, M., Coyne, S. M., Stern, L. A., Stockdale, L., Miller, M. J., & Wells, B. M. (2012). A content analysis of the prevalence and portrayal of sexual activity in adolescent literature. Journal of Sex Research, 49(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.572306.
Canadian Federation of Students. (2018). Gender-based violence. https://tinyurl.com/7u789khn
Cihon, T. M., & Mattaini, M. A. (2020). Behavior science perspectives on culture and community. Springer.
de Fernandes, R. C., & Dittrich, A. (2017). Expanding the behavior-analytic meanings of “freedom”: The contributions of Israel Goldiamond. Behavior and Social Issues, 27(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8248.
Diaz, J., Cramer, M., & Morales, C. (2020). What we know about the death of Vanessa Guillen. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/vanessa-guillen-fort-hood.html
Dresser, M. (2019). New Maryland laws underscore: No means no, rape is rape. The Baltimore Sun. https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/bs-md-new-laws-october-20170927-story.html
Dunkley, C. R., & Brotto, L. A. (2020). The role of consent in the context of BDSM. Sexual Abuse, 32(6), 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219842847.
Fahs, B. (2014). “Freedom to” and “freedom from”: A new vision for sex-positive politics. Sexualities, 17(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516334.
Farrow, R., & Mayer, J. (2018). Senate Democrats investigate a new allegation of sexual misconduct, from the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s college years. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
Friedman, J., & Valenti, J. (2008). Yes means yes! Visions of female sexual power & a world without rape. Seal Press.
Fulkerson, A. (2010). Bound by consent: Concepts of consent within the leather and bondage, domination, sadomasochism (BDSM) communities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Wichita State University.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392470.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393175.
Goldiamond, I. (1975). Singling out behavior modification for legal regulation: Some effects on patient care, psychotherapy, and research in general. Arizona Law Review, 17, 105–126.
Goldiamond, I. (1976). Protection of human subjects and patients: A social contingency analysis of distinctions between research and practice, and its implications. Behaviorism, 4, 1–41.
Hineline, P. N. (2001). Beyond the molar–molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analyses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75(3), 342–347.
Hodges, A., Wilder, D. A., & Ertel, H. (2020). Assessment and treatment of a foot fetish exhibited by an adolescent with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(4), 961–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00468-1.
Humphreys, T., & Herold, E. (2003). Should universities and colleges mandate sexual behavior? Student perceptions of Antioch College’s consent policy. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 15(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v15n01_04.
Jacques-Tiura, A. J., Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., & Zawacki, T. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women’s sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207306281.
Johnson, A. M., & Hoover, S. M. (2015). The potential of sexual consent interventions on college campuses: A literature review on the barriers to establishing affirmative sexual consent. Pure Insights, 4(1), 5–12.
Kantor, J. R. (1953). The logic of modern science. Principia Press.
Kaplan, M. (2014). Sex-positive law. New York University Law Review, 89(1), 89–164.
Klement, K. R., Sagarin, B. J., & Lee, E. M. (2017). Participating in a culture of consent may be associated with lower rape-supportive beliefs. Journal of Sex Research, 54(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1168353.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007.
Levy, S., Vaidya, J., Dettmering, J., Siebold, A. N., Mittelman, C., & Garner, J. (2019). Addressing social and global issues: Viewing the Syrian refugee crisis through a behavior-analytic lens. Behavior and Social Issues, 28(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00018-7.
Lisak, D., Gardinier, L., Nicksa, S. C., & Cote, A. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210387747.
Lonsway, K. A., Archambault, J., & Lisak, D. (2009). False reports: Moving beyond the issue to successfully investigate and prosecute non-stranger sexual assault. Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association, 43(1), 10–22.
McGinley, A. (2019). The masculinity mandate: #MeToo, Brett Kavanaugh, and Christine Blasey Ford. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 23, 59–83 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3434103.
Me Too. International. (2019). Me Too. Impact report 2019. https://metoomvmt.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2019-12-09_MeToo_ImpactReport_VIEW_4.pdf
Metler, K. (2018). “No means no” to “yes means yes”: How our language around sexual consent has changed. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/soloish/wp/2018/02/15/no-means-no-to-yes-means-yes-how-our-language-around-sexual-consent-has-changed/
Pineau, L. (1989). Date rape: A feminist analysis. Law and Philosophy, 8(2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00160012.
Planned Parenthood. (2021). What is sexual consent? Facts about rape & sexual assault. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/relationships/sexual-consent
Protect Our Defenders. (2020). Military sexual assault fact sheet. https://www.protectourdefenders.com/factsheet/
Pugh, B., & Becker, P. (2018). Exploring definitions and prevalence of verbal sexual coercion and its relationship to consent to unwanted sex: Implications for affirmative consent standards on college campuses. Behavioral Sciences, 8(8), 69.
Quinn, M. (2019). Marital rape isn’t necessarily a crime in 12 states. Governing. https://www.governing.com/archive/gov-marital-rape-states-ohio-minnesota.html
Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. (2021). Perpetrators of sexual violence: Statistics. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/perpetrators-sexual-violence
Saal, F. E., Johnson, C. B., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(3), 263–276.
Santos-Longhurst, A. (2019). Your guide to sexual consent. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/guide-to-consent#TOC_TITLE_HDR_1
Senate Bill No. 967, Student safety: sexual assault, Cal. Stat. Ch. 748 § 67386 (2014). http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB967
Sewell, K. K., McGarrity, L. A., & Strassberg, D. S. (2017). Sexual behavior, definitions of sex, and the role of self-partner context among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Sex Research, 54(7), 825–831.
Shumlich, E. J., & Fisher, W. A. (2018). Affirmative sexual consent? Direct and unambiguous consent is rarely included in discussions of recent sexual interactions. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27(3), 248–260.
Shumlich, E. J., & Fisher, W. A. (2020). An exploration of factors that influence enactment of affirmative consent behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 57(9), 1108–1121.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52(5), 270-277, 291-294.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Skinner, B. F. (1958). Reinforcement today. American Psychologist, 13(3), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049039.
Stack, L. (2016). Light sentence for Brock Turner in Stanford rape case draws outrage. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/07/us/outrage-in-stanford-rape-case-over-dueling-statements-of-victim-and-attackers-father.html
Stupnitsky, G.. (2019). Good boys [Film]. Good Universe; Point Grey Pictures; Universal Pictures.
Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Prepared for anything? An investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues. Psychological Science, 22(2), 159–165.
Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Is sexual concordance related to awareness of physiological states? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 199–208.
The Science of BDSM Research Team. (n.d.). The science of BDSM. https://www.scienceofbdsm.com
Tuerkheimer, D. (2015). Affirmative consent. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 13(2), 441–468. https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/77938/1/OSJCL_V13N2_441.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Sexual assault. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault
Volou, K. (2020). Marital rape is legal in Maryland. Here’s how this new bill wants to change that. WUSA9. https://tinyurl.com/dbjs87b4
Wade, J. A. (2018). (I think) you are pretty: A behavior analytic conceptualization of flirtation. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(2), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0136-y.
Williams, D. J., Prior, E., & Wegner, J. (2013). Resolving social problems associated with sexuality: Can a “sex-positive” approach help? Social Work, 58(3), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt024.
Williams, D. J., Thomas, J. N., Prior, E. E., & Christensen, M. C. (2014). From “SSC” and “RACK” to the “4Cs”: Introducing a new framework for negotiating BDSM participation. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 17(5), 1–10.
Williams, D. J., Thomas, J. N., Prior, E. E., & Walters, W. (2015). Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. Journal of Positive Sexuality, 1, 6–11.
Wiseman, J. (1996). SM 101: A realistic introduction. Greenery Press.
World Population Review. (2021). Rape statistics by country 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021, from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rape-statistics-by-country
Zettle, R., & Hayes, S. (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy (Vol. 1). Academic Press.
Author Note
Because we (a) believe our respective absolute contributions were a function of disparities in resources and associated learning histories (i.e., our privilege) and (b) believe them to be functionally equivalent and, indeed, inseparable, when considering interlocking contingencies, we have agreed to publish this article in the name of our lab, each of us functioning as a representative thereof. We have further agreed, in the name of the Louisiana Contextual Science Research Group (LCSRG), to the submission of this manuscript in this form. LCSRG representatives serving as contributing authors include (in alphabetical order) Jade Campbell, Rebecca Copell, Madison Gamble, Heather Garnos, Eva Lieberman, Brad Parfait, Wade Richardson, MaKensey Sanders, Emily Sandoz, Thomas Sease, Janani Vaidya, and Heather Volchko.
Funding
No funding supported this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
The members of the Louisiana Contextual Science Research Group listed in the Author Note participated in a functionally equivalent way in the publication of this article by participating in conceptual discussions, reviewing the literature, collaborating on the creation of an outline, and writing, editing, and proofreading the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
On behalf of all authors, Emily Sandoz states that there are no conflicts of interest to report.
Ethics approval
Not applicable, as no data were collected.
Consent to participate
Not applicable, as no data were collected.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to the submission of the manuscript in its current form.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable, as no data were collected.
Code availability
Not applicable, as no programs were used.
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: Authorship of this article has been updated. Louisiana Contextual Science Research Group is the sole author of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandoz, E., Louisiana Contextual Science Research Group. Beyond “Yes Means Yes”: A Behavioral Conceptualization of Affirmative Sexual Consent. Behav. Soc. Iss. 30, 712–731 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00066-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00066-y