Abstract
Methods to discourage the behavior of littering and promote the proper disposal of trash have been studied for many years; however, littering remains a problem in various settings (Almosa, Parkinson, & Rundle-Thiele, 2017, “Littering Reduction: A Systematic Review of Research 1995–2015,” Social Marketing Quarterly, 23[3], 203–222). The purpose of this field study was to further explore features and influences of signage posted alongside trash cans—signs aimed at discouraging littering and encouraging pedestrians to make use of the nearby receptacle when appropriate. To evaluate littering across sign versus no-sign preparations and to examine whether littering was differentially sensitive to symmetrically worded “do” versus “don’t” sign conditions, we prepared an alternating-treatments design with condition reversals. Results indicated that the condition without a sign was inferior to conditions with signs and that there were negligible differences between the “do” and “don’t” sign conditions. We discuss our findings in the context of methodological and social validity considerations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adelinis, J. D., & Hagopian, L. P. (1999). The use of symmetrical “do” and “don’t” requests to interrupt ongoing activities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-519.
Almosa, Y., Parkinson, J., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2017). Littering reduction: A systematic review of research 1995–2015. Social Marketing Quarterly, 23(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1524500417697654.
Austin, J., Hafield, D. B., Grindle, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effects specific, informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-247.
Bennett, M. K., Manal, H., & Van Houten, R. (2014). A comparison of gateway in-street sign configuration to other driver prompts to increase yielding to pedestrians at crosswalks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.103.
Burgess, R. L., Clark, R. N., & Hendee, J. C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-71.
Fisher, W. W., Adelinis, J. D., Thompson, R. H., Worsdell, A. S., & Zarcone, J. R. (1998). Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of “don’t” (and symmetrical “do”) requests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-339.
Geller, E. S. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Geller, E. S., Witmer, J. F., & Tuso, M. A. (1977). Environmental interventions for litter control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.3.344.
Horsley, A. D. (1988). The unintended effects of a posted sign on littering attitudes and stated intentions. Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1988.9942757.
Houlihan, D., & Jones, R. N. (1990). Exploring the reinforcement of compliance with “do” and “don’t” requests and the side effects: A partial replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 67(2), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.67.2.439.
Huffman, K. T., Grossnickle, W. F., Cope, J. G., & Huffman, K. P. (1995). Litter reduction: A review and integration of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 27(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165952720033.
Kratzke, C., Short, M., & San Filippo, B. (2014). Promoting safe hygiene practices in public restrooms: A pilot study. Journal of Environmental Health, 77, 8–12 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26330135.
Neef, N. A., Shafer, M. S., Egel, A. L., Cataldo, M. F., & Parrish, J. M. (1983). The class specific effects of compliance training with “do” and “don’t” requests: Analogue analysis and classroom application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1983.16-81.
Van Houten, R. (1988). The effects of advance stop lines and sign prompts on pedestrian safety in a crosswalk on a multilane highway. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1988.21-245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newcomb, E.T., Newcomb, B.B. Comparative Effects of “Do” Versus “Don’t” Formatted Signage on Littering. Behav. Soc. Iss. 29, 264–271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-020-00039-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-020-00039-7