Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 229–247 | Cite as

The Selection of Different Interlocked Behavioral Contingencies and Maintenance of Common Pool Resources: The Case of the Production of Açaí Berries in the Brazilian Amazon

  • Aécio BorbaEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Many different fields of knowledge approach social problems such as the overuse of resources necessary for human development and survival. Joining that enterprise, behavior analysts strive for a clear description of the contingencies that select problematic cultural practices or prevent the spread of solutional patterns of behavior. This description ought to encompass the reinforcement contingencies that operate not only at the ontogenetic level but also at the cultural level. For that enterprise, especially when one looks at the possible overuse of common pool resources, a dialogue with Elinor Ostrom’s work is valuable. This article aims to describe and analyze the selection of different cultural practices in the case of the production of açaí berries in the Brazilian Amazon. In the past, caboclo communities in the Amazon region harvested and consumed the fruit in sustainable common pool management. The boom in the economy in the last 50 years has led to new practices. This paper argues that the profit of this market has selected new interlocked behavioral contingencies that may have different long-term natural effects, such as environmental erosion, and social costs, such as the exclusion of the traditional populations and the limiting of the low-income population’s access to the product.

Keywords

Cultural selection Common pool resources Amazon Açaí Metacontingencies Macrocontingencies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the participants in the think tank for their contributions, especially Dr. Angelo Augusto Sampaio, Dr. Laercia Abreu Vasconcelos, Dr. Maria Malott, Dr. Roberta Lemos, and Dr. Sigrid Glenn for their comments on the first draft of this manuscript. The author presented a previous version of this manuscript during the 2018 Think Tank in Culturo-Behavior Science in Denton, Texas, and at the 2019 Association for Behavior Analysis International Conference in Chicago, Illinois.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares there was no conflic of interest in the production of this paper.

References

  1. Baia, F. H., Neves, S. M. M., Almeida Dilho, J. C. d. R., Melo Junior, I. F., Souza, A. C. G., & Lemes, I. G. (2017). Ethnogenesis of a Brazilian indigenous community, a behavior analytic interpretation: Ethnogenesis of the tapuios do carretão. Behavior and Social Issues, 26, 51–66.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.26i0.6856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batista, K. T. (2013). Avaliação da sustentabilidade de agroecossistemas familiares agroextrativistas de açaizeiros na região das ilhas do município de Cametá, Pará [Evaluation of the sustainability of agroextractive family agrosystems of açaí palm trees in the region of isled]. Belém, PA: Universidade Federal do Pará.Google Scholar
  3. Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2014). Establishing the macrobehavior of ethical self-control in an arrangement of macrocontingencies in two microcultures. Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 68–86.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2017). Effects of cultural consequences on the interlocking behavioral contingencies of ethical self-control. Psychological Record, 67, 399–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0231-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brondízio, E. S. (2004). From staple to fashion food: Shifting cycles and shifting opportunities in the development of açai palm fruit economy in the Brazilian estuary. In D. J. Zarin, J. R. R. Alavalapati, F. E. Putz, & M. Schmink (Eds.), Working forests in the neotropics: Conservation through sustainable management (pp. 339–365). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brondízio, E. S. (2008). Amazonian caboclo and the açaí palm. New York, NY: The New York Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brondízio, E. S., Safar, C. A. M., & Siqueira, A. D. (2002). The urban market of acai fruit (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) and rural land use change: Ethnographic insights into the role of price and land tenure constraining agricultural choices in the Amazon estuary. Urban Ecosystem, 6, 67–97.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025966613562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camargo, J., & Haydu, V. B. (2016). Fostering the sustainable use of common-pool resources through behavioral interventions: An experimental approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 61–76.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.25i0.6328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, M. E., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), art38.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dal Ben, R., Camargo, J., De Melo, C. M., & Figueiras, G. B. (2017). Análise do comportamento e sustentabilidade: Revisão dos artigos publicados no Behavior and Social Issues de 2005 a 2016 [provide a translation of the title here]. Revista Brasileira de Análise Do Comportamento, 12(2), 86–94.  https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v12i2.4401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  12. Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2002). The drama of the commons. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 3–35).  https://doi.org/10.17226/10287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M. F. L., Houmanfar, R., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.25i0.6634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248 Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19390450903037302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, M. (1968). The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, M. (1998). Theories of culture in postmodern times. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  18. Homma, A. K. O. (2012). Extrativismo vegetal ou plantio: Qual a opção para a Amazônia? [Plant extractivism or planting: What is the option for Amazon?]. Estudos Avançados, 26(74), 167–186.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142012000100012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Homma, A. K. O., Nogueira, O. L., Menezes, A. J. E. A., Carvalho, J. E. U., Nicoli, C. M. L., & Matos, G. B. (2014). Açaí: Novos desafios e tendências [Açaí: New challenges and tendencies]. In A. K. O. Homma (Ed.), Extrativismo vegetal na Amazônia: História, ecologia, economia e domesticação (pp. 133–148). Brasília, Brazil: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  20. Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. J. (2006). The metacontingency and the behavioral contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lima, E. U., Homma, A. K. O., Tahim, E. F., Brienza, S., Jr., & Tavares, F. B. (2013). O arranjo produtivo local (APL) do açaí na Ilha de Arumanduba (Abaetetuba/PA): Um estudo de caso na comunidade Nossa Senhora da Paz [The local productive arrangements of açaí in the island of Arumanduba (Abaetetuba/PA): A case study of the Nossa Senhora]. Novas Fronteiras Da Agropecuária No Brasil e Na Amazônia: Desafios Da Sustentabilidade: Anais. Retrieved from http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/92741/1/1843.pdf
  23. Lira, T. d. M., & Chaves, M. d. P. S. R. (2016). Comunidades ribeirinhas na Amazônia: organização sociocultural e política [Riverside communities in the Amazon: Sociocultural and political organization]. Interações, 17, 66–76 Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/inter/v17n1/1518-7012-inter-17-01-0066.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luke, M., & Alavosius, M. P. (2012). Impacting community sustainability through behavior change: A research framework. Behavior and Social Issues, 21, 54–79.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v21i0.3938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malagodi, E. F., & Jackson, K. (1989). Behavior analysts and cultural analysis: Troubles and issues. The Behavior Analyst, 12(1), 17–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mattaini, M. A., Twyman, J. S., Chin, W., & Lee, K. N. (1996). Youth violence. In M. A. Mattaini & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Finding solutions to social problems (pp. 75–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Murrieta, R. S. S., Dufour, D. L., & Siqueira, A. D. (1999). Food consumption and subsistence in three caboclo populations on Marajo Island, Amazonia, Brazil. Human Ecology, 27(3), 455–475.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018779624490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nogueira, A. K. M., de Santana, A. C., & Garcia, W. S. (2013). A dinâmica do mercado de açaí fruto no Estado do Pará: De 1994 a 2009 [The dynamics of açai market in Pará State from 1994 to 2009]. Revista Ceres, 60(3), 324–331.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2013000300004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nonini, D. M. (2007). Introduction: The global idea of the commons. In D. M. Nonini (Ed.), The global idea of “the commons” (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. City, ST: Publisher.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with the tragedy of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 493–535.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ostrom, E. (2002). Policy analysis in the future of good societies. The Good Society, 11(1), 42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2002.0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rachlin, H. (2002). Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 239–250.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Silva, I. S., & De Castro, E. M. R. (2013). Interações rural-urbano: A sociobiodiversidade e o trabalho em portos, feiras e mercados de Belém, Pará [Rural-urban interactions: Sociobiodiversity and work system in wharves, marts and marketplaces of Belém, Pará State]. Novos Cadernos NAEA, 16(1).  https://doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v16i1.1453.
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Why we are not acting to save the world. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Upon further reflection (pp. 1–14). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B. F. (2014). Science and human behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation (Original work published 1953).Google Scholar
  40. Steward, A. (2013). Reconfiguring agrobiodiversity in the Amazon estuary: Market integration, the açaí trade and smallholders’ management practices in Amapá, Brazil. Human Ecology, 41(6), 827–840.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9608-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tavares, G. d. S., & Homma, A. K. O. (2015). Comercialização do açaí no Estado Do Pará: Alguns comentários [Açaí marketing in the Pará State: Some comments]. Observatório de La Economía Latinoamericana, 1(September), 1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Tourinho, E. Z. (2013). Cultural consequences and interlocking behavioral contingencies: Selection at the cultural level. Behavior and Philosophy, 41, 60–69.Google Scholar
  43. Ulbricht, C., Brigham, A., Burke, D., Costa, D., Giese, N., Iovin, R., et al. (2012). An evidence-based systematic review of acai (Euterpe oleracea) by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. Journal of Dietary Supplements, 9(2), 128–147.  https://doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2012.686347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21–S32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Teoria e Pesquisa do ComportamentoUniversidade Federal do ParáBelémBrazil
  2. 2.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations