Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of the spray-type adhesion barrier “AdSpray®”in pediatric laparoscopic surgery

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The spray-type adhesion barrier “AdSpray®” can be easily used even in a small abdominal cavity. However, there have been no reports on the safety and efficacy of its application in children. We retrospectively examined the safety and efficacy of AdSpray® in pediatric laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients < 18 years old for whom AdSpray® was used in laparoscopic surgery at our institution between September 2017 and December 2021. As postoperative adverse events, intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis and wound infection were evaluated. The morbidity of ileus during the postoperative follow-up period was also evaluated. Liver enzymes and the renal function before and after surgery were analyzed.

Results

A total of 64 children underwent laparoscopic surgery and simultaneous AdSpray® treatment. There were 48 children < 6 years old. There were no allergic symptoms or inflammatory reactions, liver dysfunction or renal dysfunction during and the stable period after surgery. Three patients with adhesive ileus who underwent laparoscopic surgery using AdSpray® did not show recurrent ileus in over three year of clinical follow-up.

Conclusion

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of AdSpray® in pediatric laparoscopic surgery, and no adverse events associated with AdSpray® usage were confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Molinaro F, Kaselas C, Lacreuse I, Moog R, Becmeur F (2009) Postoperative intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic versus open surgery in the pediatric population: a 15-year review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:160–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jolley SG, Tunell WP, Hoelzer DJ, Smith EI (1986) Postoperative small bowel obstruction in infants and children: a problem following Nissen fundoplication. J Pediatr Surg 21:407–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkins BM, Spitz L (1987) Adhesion obstruction following Nissen fundoplication in children. Br J Surg 74:777–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA et al (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg 42:939–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Linden BC, Bairdain S, Zurakowski D, Shamberger RC, Lillehei CW (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted and open total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 48:1546–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suto T, Watanabe M, Endo T et al (2017) The primary result of prospective randomized multicenter trial of new spray-type bio-absorbable adhesion barrier system (TCD-11091) against postoperative adhesion formation. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1683–1691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cezar C, Korell M, Tchartchian G et al (2016) How to avoid risks for patients in minimal-access trials: avoiding complications in clinical first-in-human studies by example of the ADBEE study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 35:84–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cezar C, Tchartchian G, Korell M et al (2016) Long term follow-up concerning safety and efficacy of novel adhesion prophylactic agent for laparoscopic myomectomy in the prospective randomized ADBEE study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 35:97–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kai M, Maeda K, Tasaki M et al (2018) Evaluation of a spray-type, novel dextrin hydrogel adhesion barrier under laparoscopic conditions in a porcine uterine horn adhesion model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25:447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park EY, Kwon JY, Kim KJ (2012) Carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic surgery. Yonsei Med J 53:459–466

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amin MD, Harpavat S, Leung DH (2015) Drug-induced liver injury in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 27:625–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patzer L (2008) Nephrotoxicity as a cause of acute kidney injury in children. Pediatr Nephrol 23:2159–2173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Okubo S, Shindoh J, Kobayashi Y, Matsumura M, Hashimoto M (2021) Adhesions as a risk factor for postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy and the potential efficacy of adhesion barriers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:618–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Mr. Brian Quinn for his advices and help with the manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM and KS drafted the manuscript and equally contributed to this study. SI and TK supervised the writing of the manuscript. YI, MO, LT, NN, AN, KY, SO, TH, KY WY, MM, TK and MM performed surgery and perioperative management of the patient. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Ieiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with regard to this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan in 2014. The study complied with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki (revised in 2013) and was approved by the local ethics committee of Kagoshima University Hospital (registration number: 27-119). All participants, or their parents, provided their informed consent for inclusion for publication of this article and any companying images.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murakami, M., Sugita, K., Iwamoto, Y. et al. Safety of the spray-type adhesion barrier “AdSpray®”in pediatric laparoscopic surgery. J Ped Endosc Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-024-00226-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-024-00226-y

Keywords

Navigation