Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of papers presented at the BAPES congress, 2019-2022

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To review characteristics of papers presented at the BAPES congress over a 4 year period.

Methods

Papers presented at BAPES congresses 2019–2022 were identified from publicly available congress programmes. Papers were grouped by sub-specialty and centre. Descriptive statistics performed in Microsoft Excel.

Results

The total number of papers presented was 2019: 57, 2020:22, 2021:48, 2022:41. The most presented subspecialty was urology (57 papers, 34%). In 2019, upper GI had the largest share (30%); subsequently, urology has had the largest share (2020:45%, 2021:35%, 2022:41%). 79% of papers were from UK centres. In 2019, 12% of papers were from international centres. This rose in 2020 (31%) but has since decreased (2021:27%, 2022:22%). Within the UK, the most represented consortium is London and the South-East (62% of UK papers). The most represented centres are Great Ormond Street (26, 20%) and Evelina (18, 14%).

Conclusion

Since 2020, urology has consistently been the most presented subspecialty. The majority of papers are from UK centres. Following an increase in 2020, the number of international papers is falling– this may be due to international centres wishing to attend local in person conferences. 34% of UK papers are from 2 centres in the London and South-East consortium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. British Association of Paediatric Endoscopic Surgeons (2019) ‘Constitution, BAPES’. Section 2, objectives b and c. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c547dd3d7819e06b90a19ae/t/5c714d00971a1842777e845e/1550929153281/BAPES+Constitution+2019.pdf

  2. Valenti A, Fortuna G, Barillari C, Cannone E, Boccuni V, Iavicoli S (2021) The future of scientific conferences in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: critical analysis and future perspectives. Ind Health 59:334–339. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaëta BA, De Las Rivas J, Horton P, Meysman P, Mulder N, Romano P, Welch L (2017) Ten simple rules for forming a scientific professional society. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gruben P, Orda E (2023) Blog post ‘How to craft the perfect call for papers’ Accessed 25/11/2023. [https://www.exordo.com/blog/perfect-call-for-papers/]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Macdonald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Alexander Macdonald is on the executive committee of BAPES. There are no financial interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westwood, E., Macdonald, A. Characteristics of papers presented at the BAPES congress, 2019-2022. J Ped Endosc Surg 6, 33–36 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-023-00213-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-023-00213-9

Keywords

Navigation