Skip to main content
Log in

Jejuno-ileal atresia: evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic approach

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Jejuno-ileal atresia is a main cause of neonatal intestinal obstructions, and minimal access technique is gaining popularity. Aim of this study was to perform systematic review of laparoscopic approach with regards its management efficacy.

Methods

Pubmed® was searched using terms ‘jejunal’, ‘jejuno-intestinal atresia’, ‘laparoscopic’ or ‘laparoscopic-assisted’. Data collected included gender, age, weight, comorbidities, surgical technique, duration of surgery, complications, reoperation, mortality, parenteral feeding time.

Results

5 articles (2004–2020) met the inclusion criteria with 63 neonates. Mean weight was 2.6 kg. There were n = 16 comorbidities: cardiac anomalies (n = 5), Meckel’s diverticulum (n = 2), meconium peritonitis (n = 4), unknown (n = 5). All patients had laparoscopic-assisted surgery, out of which n = 25 were single-port approach. Conversion was reported in n = 4 cases due to meconium ileus (n = 2), or significantly dilated bowel (n = 2). There were n = 7 complications (n = 1 sepsis, n = 2 anastomotic leaks, n = 1 cholestasis, n = 3 adhesive ileus). Two reoperations were necessary because of anastomotic dehiscence (n = 1) and adhesive ileus (n = 1). Mean parenteral feeding time was 13 days. There were three lethal outcomes, due to sepsis after anastomotic leak (n = 1), severe cardiac defect (n = 1), pneumonia and adhesive ileus (n = 1).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic-assisted is opted for jejuno-ileal atresia when minimal access approach is preferred. It is fast and feasible technique, which offers better cosmesis, may result shorter length of operation and recovery. There is > 10% complication rate, which rarely require reoperation. Limitation of this approach are low weight babies with associated anomalies, or significantly dilated proximal bowels. These remain the main concern for laparoscopic-assisted surgery, which require open approach or conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osuchukwu OO, Rentea RM. Ileal Atresia. [Updated 2020 May 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557400/.

  2. Lima M, Di Salvo N, Cordola C, D’Antonio S, Libri M, Maffi M et al (2020) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery in treating intestinal atresia: single center experience. J Invest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1704316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalla Vecchia LK, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR, Engum SA (1998) Intestinal atresia and stenosis: a 25-year experience with 277 cases. Arch Surg 133(5):490–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sato S, Nishijima E, Muraji T, Tsugawa C, Kimura K (1998) Jejunoileal atresia: a 27-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90596-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan KC, Bianchi A (1986) Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soutter AD, Askew AA (2003) Transumbilical laparotomy in infants: a novel approach for a wide variety of surgical disease. J Pediatr Surg 38(6):950–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abhyankar A, Mukhtar Z (2011) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for neonatal intestinal atresia: single-center experience(*). Asian J Endosc Surg 4(2):90–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung PHY, Wong CWY, Ip DKM, Tam PKH, Wong KKY (2017) Is laparoscopic surgery better than open surgery for the repair of congenital duodenal obstruction? A review of the current evidences. J Pediatr Surg 52(3):498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maffi M, Cantone N, Destro F, Gargano T, Lima M (2014) Laparo-assisted treatment of intestinal atresia: a single center experience. JEMIS 2(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1473/jemis6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lima M, Ruggeri G, Domini M, Gargano T, Mazzero G, Landuzzi V et al (2009) Evolution of the surgical management of bowel atresia in newborn: laparoscopically assisted treatment. Pediatr Med Chir 31(5):215–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamataka A, Koga H, Shimotakahara A et al (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for prenatally diagnosed small bowel atresia: simple, safe, and virtually scar free. J Pediatr Surg 39(12):1815–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li B, Chen W, Wang S, Liu S, Li L (2012) Laparoscopy-assisted surgery for neonatal intestinal atresia and stenosis: a report of 35 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 28(12):1225–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li B, Xia S, Chen W, Wang S, Wang Y (2015) Laparoscope-assisted intestinal lengthening using an anterior flap in jejunal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 31(12):1183–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Onofre LS, Maranhão RFA, Martins ECS, Fachin CG, Martins JL (2013) Apple-peel intestinal atresia: enteroplasty for intestinal lengthening and primary anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 48(6):E5–E7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacher M, Kuebler JF, Dingemann J, Ure BM (2014) Minimal invasive surgery in the newborn: current status and evidence. Semin Pediatr Surg 23(5):249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Rieth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rieth, A., Balogh, B. & Kovács, T. Jejuno-ileal atresia: evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic approach. J Ped Endosc Surg 3, 33–37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-020-00081-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-020-00081-7

Keywords

Navigation