Digital sources and digital archives: historical evidence in the digital age


As the cultural record becomes increasingly digital the evidentiary basis of history expands and shifts. How must historical scholarship change when the evidentiary basis shifts toward the digital? Through explorations of a series of born digital and digitized sources, we identify and discuss key issues relating to humanities scholars ability to develop claims and arguments grounded in digital sources and digital archives. In exploring these issues in digital source criticism, we work to provide practical guidance for scholars on key issues and questions to consider when working with born digital and digitized primary sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Arcangel, C. (2014). The Warhol files: Andy Warhol’s long-lost computer graphics. Artforum, (summer). Retrieved from

  2. Bailey, J. (2013). Disrespect des Fonds: Rethinking arrangement and description in born-digital archives - archive journal issue 3. Archive Journal, (3). Retrieved from

  3. Brennan, S., & Kelly, M. (2009). Why Collecting History Online is Web 1.5 (Center for History and new Media, case study). Fairfax, VA. Retrieved from

  4. Bushman, R. L. (1992). The refinement of America: Persons, houses, cities. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carr, C. T., & Stefaniak, C. (2012). Sent from my iPhone: The medium and message as cues of sender professionalism in Mobile telephony. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(4), 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronon, W. (1983). Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fino-Radin, B. (2012). Rhizome ArtBase: Preserving Born Digital Works of Art. Presented at the digital preservation. Virginia: Arlington Retrieved from

  8. Fleischhauer, C. (2011). Information or Artifact: Digitizing a Book, Part 1 | The Signal: Digital Preservation [webpage]. Retrieved August 7, 2015, from

  9. Froehlich, H. (2018, June). Distance-reading the feminine landscapes of the awakening. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from

  10. Gibbs, F., & Owens, T. (2013). The hermeneutics of data and historical writing. In K. Nawrotzki & J. Dougherty (Eds.), Writing history in the digital age. University of Michigan Press Retrieved from

  11. Good, J. (2011, September 15). How many photos have ever been taken? Retrieved August 8, 2015, from

  12. Haskins, E. (2007). Between archive and participation: Public memory in a digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(4), 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henderson, S., & Srinivasan, A. (2011). Filing, piling & structuring: Strategies for personal document management. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1–10). IEEE. Retrieved from

  14. Howell, M. C. & Prevenier, W. (2001). From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.

  15. Jones, S. (2014). The emergence of the digital humanities. New York: Routledge.

  16. Jules, B. (2016). Surveillance and social media archiving. Documenting the Now.

  17. Kalman, Y., & Ravid, G. (2015). Filing, piling, and everything in between: The dynamics of E-mail inbox management. Journal of the Association of Information Science and Technology., 66, 2540–2552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirschenbaum, M. (2007). Mechanisms: New media and the forensic imagination. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

  19. Kirschenbaum, M. (2008). Mechanisms: New media and the forensic imagination. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  20. Kirschenbaum, M., Farr, E. L., Kraus, K. M., Nelson, N., Peters, C. S., Redwine, G., & Reside, D. (2009). Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments. Retrieved from

  21. Kriesberg, A. M. (2015). The Changing Landscape of Digital Access: Public-Private Partnerships in US State and Territorial Archives. Retrieved from

  22. Leary, P. (2005). Googeling the Victorians. Journal of Victorian Culture, 10(1), 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lorang, E. M., Soh, L.-K., Datla, M. V., & Kulwicki, S. (2015). Developing an image-based classifier for detecting poetic content in historic newspaper collections, Developing an Image-Based Classifier for Detecting Poetic Content in Historic Newspaper Collections.

  24. Lynch, C. (2017). Stewardship in the "age of algorithms. First Monday 22 (12).

  25. Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marshall, C. C. (2011). Digital copies and a distributed notion of reference in personal archives. In M. A. Winget & W. Aspray (Eds.), Digital media: Technological and social challenges of the interactive world (pp. 89–115). Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McGann, J. J. (1996). The rationale of hyper text. Text, 9, 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer, R. (2018). The grim conclusions of the largest-ever study of fake news. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from

  29. Montfort, N. (2004). Continuous Paper: MLA. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from

  30. Owens, T. (2015). Lego, handcraft, and costumed zombies: What zombies do on Flickr. New Directions in Folklore, 12(2), 3–25.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Owens, T. (2018). The theory and craft of digital preservation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Padilla, T. (2017). On a collections as data imperative.

  33. Pagan, J. R. (2003). Anne Orthwood’s bastard: Sex and law in early Virginia. New York: Oxford University Press.

  34. Putnam, L. (2016). The transnational and the text-searchable: Digitized sources and the shadows they cast. The American Historical Review., 121(2), 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramsay, S. (2014). The hermeneutics of screwing around; or what you do with a million books. In K. Kee (Ed.), Pastplay: Teaching and learning history with technology. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from

  36. Reside, D. (2011) “‘No Day But Today’: A Look at Jonathan Larson’s Word Files,” New York Public Library Blog.

  37. Rosenzweig, R. (2003). Scarcity or abundance? Preserving the past in a digital era. The American Historical Review, 108(3), 735–762.

  38. Rudy, K. (2010). Dirty books: Quantifying patterns of use in medieval manuscripts using a densitometer. Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art. 2 (1).

  39. Sternfeld, J. (2011). Archival theory and digital historiography: Selection, search, and metadata as archival processes for assessing historical contextualization. The American Archivist, 74(2), 544–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thylstrup, N. (2019). The politics of mass digitization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Trachtenberg, A. (1989). Reading American photographs: Images as history, Mathew Brady to Walker Evans (1st ed.). New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Trouillot, M. (1995). Silencing the past: Power and the production of history. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tyrrell, I. R. (2005). Historians in public: The practice of American history, 1890–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from

    Google Scholar 

  44. Werner, S. (2012). Where material book culture meets digital humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 1(3). Retrieved from

  45. Wright, R. (2019). Typewriting mass observation online: Media imprints on the digital archive. History Workshop Journal., 87(Spring), 118–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor Owens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Owens, T., Padilla, T. Digital sources and digital archives: historical evidence in the digital age. Int J Digit Humanities (2020).

Download citation


  • Digital history
  • Historigraphy
  • Research methods
  • Collections as data
  • Source criticism
  • Digitization
  • Archives