Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the technology acceptance of digital banking services in Malaysia with UTAUT model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking and Financial Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital Banks assumed a critical role in the digital economy in providing fully digitalised services to cover underserved and unserved markets. Following the recent announcement by Bank Negara Malaysia (the Central bank of Malaysia) on April 29, 2022, these banks are expected to begin their operations within 12–24 months. Thus, this study investigates the technology acceptance of Malaysians to digital banking services. Malaysians' technology acceptance towards digital banking services. The study employs the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, considering variables such as performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. Data was gathered from 384 respondents in major cities throughout Malaysia. The analysis revealed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions significantly and positively impact intention to adopt digital banking services, while social influence was found to be statistically insignificant. These findings provide valuable insights for digital banks and the central bank, enabling them to understand user perspectives on technology and enhancing the penetration of digital banking services to the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT.

Abbreviations

UTAUT:

Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

INT:

Intention to adopt digital banking services

PE:

Performance Expectancy

EE:

Effort Expectancy

SI:

Social Influence

FC:

Facilitating Conditions

References

  1. Aboelmaged M, Gebba TR (2013) Mobile banking adoption: an examination of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Int J Bus Res Dev 2(1):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Afshan S, Sharif A (2016) Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan. Telemat Inform 33(2):370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed Z, Kader A, Rashid MHU, Nurunnabi M (2017) User perception of mobile banking adoption: an integrated TTF-UTAUT model. J Internet Bank Commerce 22(3):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alalwan AA, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP (2017) Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: extending UTAUT2 with trust. Int J Inf Manag 37(3):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Albashrawi M, Motiwalla L (2017) Privacy and personalisation in continued usage intention of mobile banking: an integrative perspective. Inf Syst Front 21(5):1031–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Almetere ES, Kelana BWY, Mansor NNA (2020) Using UTAUT model to determine factors affecting internet of things acceptance in public universities. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci 10(2):142–150

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amin H, Supinah R, Aris MM, Baba R (2012) Receptiveness of mobile banking by Malaysian local customers in Sabah: an empirical investigation. J Internet Bank Commerce 17(1)

  8. Bank Negara Malaysia (2022) Five successful applicants for the digital bank licences. Bank Negara Malaysia—Central Bank of Malaysia. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/digital-bank-5-licences. Accessed 31 Oct 2022

  9. Baptista G, Oliveira T (2015) Understanding mobile banking: the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Comput Hum Behav 50:418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatiasevi V (2015) An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking. Inf Dev 32(4):799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crabbe M, Standing C, Standing S, Karjaluoto H (2009) An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. Int J Mob Commun 7(5):515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Govender I, Sihlali W (2014) A study of mobile banking adoption among university students using an extended TAM. Mediterr J Soc Sci 5(7):451

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gray B (1985) Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Hum Relat 38(10):911–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hidayatullah S, Rachmawati IK, Bukhori M, Majidah Y, Waris A (2020) Analysis of use of mobile banking with acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Int J Sci Technol Res 9(8):8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kishore SV, Sequeira AH (2016) An empirical investigation on mobile banking service adoption in rural Karnataka. SAGE Open 6(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koenig-Lewis N, Palmer A, Moll A (2010) Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. Int J Bank Mark 28(5):410–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin HF (2011) An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: the effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. Int J Inf Manag 31(3):252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu HP, Su PYJ (2009) Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Res 19(4):442–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luarn P, Lin HH (2005) Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput Hum Behav 21(6):873–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malaquias RF, Hwang Y (2016) An empirical study on trust in mobile banking: a developing country perspective. Comput Hum Behav 54:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martins C, Oliveira T, Popovic A (2014) Understanding the internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int J Inf Manag 34(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT, Mai HT, Tran TTM (2020) Determinants of digital banking services in Vietnam: applying UTAUT2 model. Asian Econ Financ Rev 10(6):680–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira T, Popovic A, Martins C (2014) Understanding the internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int J Inf Manag 34(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrova LA, Kuznetsova TE, Eremina SA, Kalachev OA (2020) Digital bank of the future. In: Proceedings of the III international scientific and practical conference "Digital Economy and Finances" (ISPC-DEF 2020)

  25. Phaneuf A (2022) Digital banking in 2022: disruptive bank technology trends. https://www.insiderintelligence.com/insights/digital-banking-trends/. Accessed 31 Oct 2022

  26. Phonthanukitithaworn C, Sellitto C, Fong MWL (2016) An investigation of mobile payment (M-payment) services in Thailand. Asia Pac J Bus Admin 8(1):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pourebrahimi N, Kordnaeij A, Hosseini HK, Azar A (2018) Developing a digital banking framework in the Iranian Banks. Int J E-Bus Res 14(4):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pratima M, Babu GNPV (2020) Mobile banking adoption in the millennial customers: a revised UTAUT model. Int J Recent Technol Eng 8(6):3570–3576

    Google Scholar 

  29. Puschel J, Mazzon JA, Hernandez JM (2010) Mobile banking: proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework. Int J Bank Mark 28(5):389–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rahi S, Ghani M, Ngah A (2019) Integration of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in internet banking adoption setting: evidence from Pakistan. Technol Soc 58:101120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raza SA, Shah N, Ali M (2019) Acceptance of mobile banking in Islamic banks: evidence from modified utaut model. J Islam Mark 10(1):357–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Riquelme HE, Rios RE (2010) The moderating effect of gender in the adoption of mobile banking. Int J Bank Mark 28(5):328–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sarfaraz J (2017) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model-mobile banking. J Internet Bank Commerce 22(3):1–20

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaikh AA, Glavee-Geo R, Karjaluoto H (2018) How relevant are risk perceptions, effort, and performance expectancy in mobile banking adoption? Int J E-Bus Res 14(2):39–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh S, Srivastava RK (2018) Predicting the intention to use mobile banking in India. Int J Bank Mark 36(2):357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sonono B, Ortstad R (2017) The effects of the digital transformation process on banks’ relationship with customers: case study of a large Swedish bank

  37. Subramaniam P (2021) Digital banking: the next generation of banks. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/digital-banking-next-generation-banks. Accessed 31 Oct 2022

  38. Tan E, Lau JL (2016) Behavioural intention to adopt mobile banking among the millennial generation. Young Consum 17(1):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tarhini A, El-Masri M, Ali M, Serrano A (2016) Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers’ acceptance and use of internet banking in Lebanon. Inf Technol People 29(4):830–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thusi P, Maduku DK (2020) South African millennials’ acceptance and use of Retail mobile banking apps: an integrated perspective. Comput Hum Behav 111:106405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Valsamidis S, Tsourgiannis L, Pappas D, Mosxou E (2020) Digital Banking in the new era: exploring customers’ attitudes. Contrib Econ 111:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Venkatesh V, Zhang X (2010) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U.S. vs. China. J Glob Inf Technol Manag 13(1):5–27

  44. Venkateswari KV (2018) Technology innovation in banks—need for Omni-channel services. Int J Res Granthaalayah 6(1):150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wells CS, Wollack JA (2003) An instructor’s guide to understanding test reliability. Testing & evaluation services. University of Wisconsin

  46. Yeoh SF, Chan BYF (2011) Internet banking adoption in Kuala Lumpur: an application of UTAUT model. Int J Bus Manag 6(4):161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman funded this research under UTARRF with Project number 6550/2K04.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chin-Min Koh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 189 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, CM., Chong, TP., Hasan, N.B.A. et al. Exploring the technology acceptance of digital banking services in Malaysia with UTAUT model. J BANK FINANC TECHNOL (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-024-00048-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-024-00048-9

Keywords

Navigation