Skip to main content

Physiological effects of overexpressed sigma factors on fermentative stress response of Zymomonas mobilis

Abstract

Zymomonas mobilis is a bacterium of industrial interest due to its high ethanol productivity and high tolerance to stresses. Although the physiological parameters of fermentation are well characterized, there are few studies on the molecular mechanisms that regulate the response to fermentative stress. Z. mobilis ZM4 presents five different sigma factors identified in the genome annotation, but the absence of sigma 38 leads to the questioning of which sigma factors are responsible for its mechanism of fermentative stress response. Thus, in this study, factors sigma 32 and sigma 24, traditionally related to heat shock, were tested for their influence on the response to osmotic and ethanol stress. The overexpression of these sigma factors in Z. mobilis ZM4 strain confirmed that both are associated with heat shock response, as described in other bacteria. Moreover, sigma 32 has also a role in the adaptation to osmotic stress, increasing both growth rate and glucose influx rate. The same strain that overexpresses sigma 32 also showed a decrease in ethanol tolerance, suggesting an antagonism between these two mechanisms. It was not possible to conclude if sigma 24 really affects ethanol tolerance in Z. mobilis, but the overexpression of this sigma factor led to a decrease in ethanol productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Cook H, Ussery DW (2013) Sigma factors in a thousand E. coli genomes. Environ Microbiol 15:3121–3129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12236

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burton Z, Burgess RR, Lin J, Moore D, Holder S, Gross CA (1981) The nucleotide sequence of the cloned rpoD gene for the RNA polymerase sigma subunit from E coli K12. Nucleic Acids Res 9:2889–2903

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber H, Polen T, Heuveling J, Wendisch VF, Hengge R (2005) Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: S-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J Bacteriol 187:1591–1603. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.5.1591-1603.2005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yura T (1996) Regulation and conservation of the heat-shock transcription factor sigma32. Genes Cells 1:277–284

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raina S, Missiakas D, Georgopoulos C (1995) The rpoE gene encoding the sigma E (sigma 24) heat shock sigma factor of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 14:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07085.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo B-M, Rhodius VA, Campbell EA, Gross CA (2009) Dissection of recognition determinants of Escherichia coli σ 32 suggests a composite −10 region with an ‘extended −10’ motif and a core −10 element. Mol Microbiol 72:815–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06690.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Seo J-S, Chong H, Park HS, Yoon K-O, Jung C, Kim JJYJ-H, Hong JH, Kim H, Kim JJYJ-H, Kil J-I, Park CJ, Oh H-M, Lee J-S, Jin S-J, Um H-W, Lee H-J, Oh S-J, Kim JJYJ-H, Kang HSHL, Lee SY, Lee KJ, Kang HSHL (2005) The genome sequence of the ethanologenic bacterium Zymomonas mobilis ZM4. Nat Biotechnol 23:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1045

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang S, Pappas KM, Hauser LJ, Land ML, Chen G-L, Hurst GB, Pan C, Kouvelis VN, Typas MA, Pelletier DA, Klingeman DM, Chang Y-J, Samatova NF, Brown SD (2009) Improved genome annotation for Zymomonas mobilis. Nat Biotechnol 27:893–894. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1009-893

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan F, Wu B, Dai L, Qin H, Shui Z, Wang J, Zhu Q, Hu G, He M (2016) Using global transcription machinery engineering (gTME) to improve ethanol tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis. Microb Cell Factories 15:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0398-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan FR, Dai LC, Wu B, Qin H, Shui ZX, Wang JL, Zhu QL, Hu QC, Ruan ZY, He MX (2015) Improving furfural tolerance of Zymomonas mobilis by rewiring a sigma factor RpoD protein. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:5363–5371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6577-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paget MSB, Helmann JD (2003) The sigma70 family of sigma factors. Genome Biol 4:203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He W, Jia C, Duan Y, Zou Q (2018) 70ProPred: a predictor for discovering sigma70 promoters based on combining multiple features. BMC Syst Biol 12:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-018-0570-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gopalkrishnan S, Nicoloff H, Ades SE (2014) Co-ordinated regulation of the extracytoplasmic stress factor, sigmaE, with other Escherichia coli sigma factors by (p)ppGpp and DksA may be achieved by specific regulation of individual holoenzymes. Mol Microbiol 93:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12674

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ades SE (2008) Regulation by destruction: design of the σEenvelope stress response. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:535–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2008.10.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Erickson JW, Gross CA (1989) Identification of the sigma E subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: a second alternate sigma factor involved in high-temperature gene expression. Genes Dev 3:1462–1471

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bianchi AA, Baneyx F (1999) Hyperosmotic shock induces the sigma32 and sigmaE stress regulons of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 34:1029–1038

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Staroń A, Sofia HJ, Dietrich S, Ulrich LE, Liesegang H, Mascher T (2009) The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factor protein family. Mol Microbiol 74:557–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06870.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaczmarczyk A, Campagne S, Danza F, Metzger LC, Vorholt JA, Francez-Charlot A (2011) Role of Sphingomonas sp. strain Fr1 PhyR-NepR- EcfG cascade in general stress response and identification of a negative regulator of PhyR. J Bacteriol 193:6629–6638. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06006-11

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. He MX, Wu B, Shui ZX, Hu QC, Wang WG, Tan FR, Tang XY, Zhu QL, Pan K, Li Q, Su XH (2012) Transcriptome profiling of Zymomonas mobilis under ethanol stress. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4155-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakahigashi K, Yanagi H, Yura T (1995) Isolation and sequence analysis of rpoH genes encoding sigma 32 homologs from gram negative bacteria: conserved mRNA and protein segments for heat shock regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4383–4390

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nanamiya H, Ohashi Y, Asai K, Moriya S, Ogasawara N, Fujita M, Sadaie Y, Kawamura F (1998) ClpC regulates the fate of a sporulation initiation sigma factor, sigmaH protein, in Bacillus subtilis at elevated temperatures. Mol Microbiol 29:505–513

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim B, Miyazaki R, Neher S, Siegele DA, Ito K, Walter P, Akiyama Y, Yura T, Gross CA (2013) Heat shock transcription factor σ32 co-opts the signal recognition particle to regulate protein homeostasis in E. coli. PLoS Biol 11:e1001735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001735

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang K, Shao H, Cao Q, He M, Wu B, Feng H (2015) Transcriptional analysis of adaptation to high glucose concentrations in Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2009–2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6342-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovach ME, Phillips RW, Elzer PH, Roop RM, Peterson KM (1994) pBBR1MCS: a broad-host-range cloning vector. Biotechniques 16:800–802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Linger JG, Adney WS, Darzins A (2010) Heterologous expression and extracellular secretion of cellulolytic enzymes by zymomonas mobilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6360–6369. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00230-10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindner P (1928) Gärungsstudien über Pulque in Mexiko. Bericht des Westpreussischen Bot Vereins 50:253–255

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez F, Arsène-Ploetze F, Rist W, Rüdiger S, Schneider-Mergener J, Mayer MP, Bukau B (2008) Molecular basis for regulation of the heat shock transcription factor σ32by the DnaK and DnaJ chaperones. Mol Cell 32:347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Matsushita K, Azuma Y, Kosaka T, Yakushi T, Hoshida H, Akada R, Yamada M (2016) Genomic analyses of thermotolerant microorganisms used for high-temperature fermentations. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80:655–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2015.1104235

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Charoensuk K, Sakurada T, Tokiyama A, Murata M, Kosaka T (2017) Thermotolerant genes essential for survival at a critical high temperature in thermotolerant ethanologenic Zymomonas mobilis TISTR 548. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:204 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0891-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sootsuwan K, Irie A, Murata M, Lertwattanasakul N, Thanonkeo P, Yamada M (2007) Thermotolerant Zymomonas mobilis: comparison of ethanol fermentation capability with that of an efficient type strain. Open Biotechnol J 1:59–65. https://doi.org/10.2174/187407070701015907

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Douka E, Koukkou AI, Vartholomatos G, Frillingos S, Papamichael EM, Drainas C (1999) A Zymomonas mobilis mutant with delayed growth on high glucose concentrations. J Bacteriol 181:4598–4604

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang S, Pan C, Tschaplinski TJ, Hurst GB, Engle NL, Zhou W, Dam PA, Xu Y, Rodriguez M, Dice L, Johnson CM, Davison BH, Brown SD (2013) Systems biology analysis of Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 ethanol stress responses. PLoS One 8:e101305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068886

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang S, Pan C, Hurst GB, Dice L, Davison BH, Brown SD (2014) Elucidation of Zymomonas mobilis physiology and stress responses by quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics. Front Microbiol 5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Noguchi A, Ikeda A, Mezaki M, Fukumori Y, Kanemori M (2014) DnaJ-promoted binding of DnaK to multiple sites on 32 in the presence of ATP. J Bacteriol 196:1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01197-13

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzuki H, Ikeda A, Tsuchimoto S, Adachi K, Noguchi A, Fukumori Y, Kanemori M (2012) Synergistic binding of DnaJ and DnaK chaperones to heat shock transcription factor σ 32 ensures its characteristic high metabolic instability. J Biol Chem 287:19275–19283. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.331470

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Alper H, Stephanopoulos G (2007) Global transcription machinery engineering: a new approach for improving cellular phenotype. Metab Eng 9:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2006.12.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Moraes LM, Astolfi-Filho S, Oliver SG (1995) Development of yeast strains for the efficient utilisation of starch: evaluation of constructs that express alpha-amylase and glucoamylase separately or as bifunctional fusion proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:1067–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zou SL, Zhang K, You L, Zhao XM, Jing X, Zhang MH (2012) Enhanced electrotransformation of the ethanologen Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 with plasmids. Eng Life Sci 12:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100106

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodrigues MI, Lemma AF (2014) Experimental design and process optimization. CRC Press, First

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Rodrigues MI, Costa P (2018) Protimiza experimental design. http://experimental-design.protimiza.com.br. Accessed 1 Feb 2019

  42. Kim IS, Barrow KD, Rogers PL (2000) Kinetic and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of xylose metabolism by recombinant Zymomonas mobilis ZM4(pZB5). Appl Environ Microbiol 66:186–193

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (400711/2014-1), by Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (193000830/2015) and by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The plasmid pBBR1MCS was kindly donated from Professor Henrique Ferreira (UNESP-Rio Claro, Brazil).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiago Benoliel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Gisele Monteiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benoliel, T., Rubini, M.R., de Souza Baptistello, C. et al. Physiological effects of overexpressed sigma factors on fermentative stress response of Zymomonas mobilis. Braz J Microbiol 51, 65–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00158-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00158-3

Keywords

  • Zymomonas mobilis
  • Sigma factor
  • Osmotic stress
  • Heat shock response
  • Ethanol tolerance