Abstract
When people are asked to locate the self, they frequently choose the head and heart regions of the body. These bodily regions, in turn, are linked to an extensive set of metaphors, including those that conceptualize the heart as the locus of authenticity, love, and passion. Based on such considerations as well as frameworks within the self and well-being literatures, four samples of participants in three studies (total N = 527) were asked whether, on particular days, they perceived themselves to be located in their head regions of their bodies or their heart regions. When the self was perceived to be in the heart to a greater extent, participants reported higher levels of affective and eudaimonic well-being, as mediated by processes related to reward perception (Study 1), savoring (Study 2), and social activity (Study 3). In terms of daily experiences, the heart-located self is a happier self.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afreh, E. S. (2015). The metonymic and metaphoric conceptualisations of the heart in Akan and English. Legon Journal of the Humanities, 26, 38–57.
Alsmith, A. J. T., Ferrè, E. R., & Longo, M. R. (2017). Dissociating contributions of head and torso to spatial reference frames: The misalignment paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 53, 105–114.
Alsmith, A. J. T., & Longo, M. R. (2014). Where exactly am I? Self-location judgements distribute between head and torso. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 24, 70–74.
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576.
Anglin, S. M. (2014). I think, therefore I am? Examining conceptions of the self, soul, and mind. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 29, 105–116.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand Mcnally.
Berendt, E., & A., & Tanita, K. (2011). The ‘heart’ of things: A conceptual metaphoric analysis of heart and related body parts in Thai, Japanese and English. Intercultural Communication Studies, 20, 65–78.
Bernecker, K., & Becker, D. (2021). Beyond self-control: Mechanisms of hedonic goal pursuit and its relevance for well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 627–642.
Compton, R. J., Robinson, M. D., Ode, S., Quandt, L. C., Fineman, S. L., & Carp, J. (2008). Error-monitoring ability predicts daily stress regulation. Psychological Science, 19, 702–708.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.
Doerksen, S. E., Elavsky, S., Rebar, A. L., & Conroy, D. E. (2014). Weekly fluctuations in college student leisure activities and well-being. Leisure Sciences, 36, 14–34.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
Epstein, E. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). John Wiley & Sons.
Fetterman, A. K., Juhl, J., Meier, B. P., Abeyta, A., Routledge, C., & Robinson, M. D. (2020). The path to God is through the heart: Metaphoric self-location as a predictor of religiosity. Self and Identity, 19, 650–672.
Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2013). Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 316–334.
Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In E. A. Plant & P. G. Devine (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Academic Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (2019). Metaphor as dynamical-ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol, 34, 33–44.
Hanley, A. W., Lecy, N., & Hanley, R. (2021). Locating the embodied sense of self and examining its relationship with psychological well-being. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 40, 84-95.
Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2014). Weekends and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 116, 389–407.
Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 196–221.
Hicks, J. A., Schlegel, R. J., & Newman, G. E. (2019). Introduction to the special issues: Authenticity: Novel insights into a valued, yet elusive, concept. Review of General Psychology, 23, 3–7.
Huang, Y., Tse, C., & Xie, J. (2018). The bidirectional congruency effect of brightness-valence metaphoric association in the Stroop-like and priming paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 189, 76–92.
Hutchinson, S. L., & Kleiber, D. A. (2005). Gifts of the ordinary: Casual leisure’s contributions to health and well-being. World Leisure Journal, 47, 2–16.
Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 176–187.
Jovanović, V. (2015). Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 487–491.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
King, L. A., Burton, C. M., Hicks, J. A., & Drigotas, S. M. (2007). Ghosts, UFOs, and magic: Positive affect and the experiential system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 905–919.
Klein, R. J., Liu, T., Diehl, D., & Robinson, M. D. (2017). The personality-related implications of Stroop performance: Stress-contingent self-control in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 156–165.
Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. M. (2018). Mental labour. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 899–908.
Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 364–403.
Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1986). Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 803–814.
Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Lemay, E. P., Jr., Muise, A., & Tskhay, K. O. (2018). Communal motivation and well-being in interpersonal relationships: An integrative review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 1–25.
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 737–749.
Limanowski, J., & Hecht, H. (2011). Where do we stand on locating the Self? Psychology, 2, 312–317.
Lorah, J. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, 1–11.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86–92.
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1–20.
Martela, F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). Clarifying the concept of well-being: Psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23, 458–474.
Maurer, M. M., & Daukantaitė, D. (2020). Revisiting the organismic valuing process theory of personal growth: A theoretical review of Rogers and its connection to positive psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–15.
McLaughlin, K. A., Borkovec, T. D., & Sibrava, N. J. (2007). The effects of worry and rumination on affect states and cognitive activity. Behavior Therapy, 38, 23–38.
Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Multilevel modeling for psychologists. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 219–241). American Psychological Association.
Niemeier, S. (1997). To have one’s heart in the right place. Metaphorical and metonymic evidence from the folk model of the heart as the site of emotions in English. In B. Smieja & M. Tasch (Eds.), Human contact through language and linguistics (pp. 87–106). Peter Lang.
Niemeier, S. (2000). Straight from the heart-metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 195–213). Mouton de Gruyter.
Niemeier, S. (2008). To be in control: Kind-hearted and cool-headed. The head-heart dichotomy in English. In F. Sharifian, R. Dirven, N. Yu, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages (pp. 349–372). Mouton de Gruyter.
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Daily studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010). Does it matter where we live? The urban psychology of character strengths. American Psychologist, 65, 535–547.
Rathi, N., & Lee, K. (2021). Does it pay to be authentic? Implications of authenticity for life satisfaction and psychological well-being in a collectivist culture. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 147–161.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5, 199–213.
Rivera, G. N., Christy, A. G., Kim, J., Vess, M., Hicks, J. A., & Schlegel, R. J. (2019). Understanding the relationship between perceived authenticity and well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23, 113–126.
Robinson, M. D., Irvin, R. L., Wu, D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2023). On being warm-hearted: A daily diary approach to self-location, social cognition, and personality states [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University.
Robinson, M. D., Roiger, A. N., & Irvin, R. L. (2022). In touch and in tune: Preferences for openness as a substrate of experiential ability and engagement. European Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6, 1–14.
Rogers, C. R. (1963). The concept of the fully functioning person. Psychotherapy: Theory. Research & Practice, 1, 17–26.
Rogers, C. R. (1964). Toward a modern approach to values: The valuing process in the mature person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 160–167.
Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). Oxford University Press.
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.
Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367.
Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J., & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality, 71, 835–869.
Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323–355.
Sjöberg, L. (2003). Intuitive vs. analytical decision making: Which is preferred? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19, 17–29.
Swan, T. (2009). Metaphors of body and mind in the history of English. English Studies, 90, 460–475.
van der Veer, A. H., Alsmith, A. J. T., Longo, M. R., Wong, H. Y., & Mohler, B. J. (2018). Where am I in virtual reality? PLoS ONE, 13, e0204358.
Wang, L., & Maxwell, S. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20, 63–83.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Werner, K. M., & Milyavskaya, M. (2019). Motivation and self-regulation: The role of want-to motivation in the processes underlying self-regulation and self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13, 1–14.
West, S. G., Ryu, E., Kwok, O., & Cham, H. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2–50.
Westbrook, A., Kester, D., & Braver, T. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference. PLoS ONE, 8, e68210.
Wojciszke, B., Parzuchowski, M., & Bocian, K. (2015). Moral judgments and impressions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 50–54.
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 466–470.
Zeng, X., Wang, R., Oei, T. P. S., & Leung, F. Y. K. (2019). Heart of joy: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of an appreciative joy meditation training on subjective well-being and attitudes. Mindfulness, 10, 506–515.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
There is no funding for this research.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
Datasets for all studies can be found at https://osf.io/jxa8e/?view_only=cd4ca254c718473f9792ce9de083f769.
Author Contribution
All authors contributed to the designs and analyses of these studies. The first author wrote the paper, the second author performed analyses, the third author helped design the studies, and the fourth author contributed to analyses as well as paper preparation.
Ethics Approval
The studies were approved by the first author’s institutional IRB and conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Open Practices Statement
Datasets for all studies can be found at https://osf.io/jxa8e/?view_only=cd4ca254c718473f9792ce9de083f769. None of these studies was preregistered.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Shigehiro Oishi
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Irvin, R.L., Wu, D., Fetterman, A.K. et al. Heads of Worry, Hearts of Joy: Daily Diary Investigations of Self-Location and Well-Being. Affec Sci 4, 744–756 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00196-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00196-z