Skip to main content
Log in

Daily Sleep Quality and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Negative Affect and Perspective-Taking

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Affective Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sleep is an important predictor of social functioning. However, questions remain about how impaired sleep—which is common and detrimental to affective and cognitive functions necessary for providing high quality support—is linked to both the provision and perception of support, especially at the daily level. We tested links between impaired sleep and provided and perceived support in romantic couples, and whether these links were mediated by negative affect and perspective-taking. In preregistered analyses of two 14-day diary studies (Study 1 N = 111 couples; Study 2 N = 100 couples), poor daily subjective sleep quality—but not duration—was associated with less self-reported support toward a partner (in both studies), less perceived support from a partner and less partner-reported support (in Study 1), and partner perceptions of receiving less support (in Study 2). Only greater daily negative affect consistently mediated the association between participants’ impaired sleep (i.e., poor subjective sleep quality and duration) and their own support provision, as well as their partner’s perceptions of received support. Our findings suggest that the effect of sleep on social processes may be strongest for self-reported measures of support and that unique aspects of sleep might be differentially associated with social outcomes given that sleep quality—but not duration—was consistently linked to support outcomes. These findings highlight the psychosocial influences of sleep and negative affect, and may inform approaches to promote supportive partner interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Two weeks after completing the daily diary, participants completed a follow-up survey, which we do not analyze here.

  2. Two months after completing the diary surveys, participants completed a follow-up survey, which we do not analyze here.

References 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole T. Sell.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by a SSHRC Insight Grant awarded to Emily A. Impett and a New Investigator Grant ES/S005749/1 awarded to Sarah C. E. Stanton by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) of the U.K.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Availability of data and material

Data, code, materials, and preregistrations are accessible at: https://osf.io/j8kce/.

Author Contribution

Nicole T. Sell, Natalie M. Sisson, Amie M. Gordon, Sarah C. E. Stanton, and Emily A. Impett designed the research studies, preregistration, and analysis plan. Nicole T. Sell and Natalie M. Sisson analyzed the data and wrote the first draft. Nicole T. Sell, Natalie M. Sisson, Amie M. Gordon, Sarah C. E. Stanton, and Emily A. Impett contributed to draft revisions and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Code availability

Code is accessible at: https://osf.io/j8kce/.

Authors' contributions

Not applicable.

Ethics Approval

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in both studies. Study 1 was approved by the University of Toronto ethics board (protocol reference: #31063]) and Study 2 was approved by the University of Edinburgh PPLS Research Ethics Committee (protocol reference: #15-1920/3]).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Licensing

For the purpose of open access, Sarah C. E. Stanton has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Nataria Tennille Joseph

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 531 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sell, N.T., Sisson, N.M., Gordon, A.M. et al. Daily Sleep Quality and Support in Romantic Relationships: The Role of Negative Affect and Perspective-Taking. Affec Sci 4, 370–384 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00180-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00180-7

Keywords

Navigation