Skip to main content
Log in

Decoding the Regulator: Accuracy and Bias in Emotion Regulation Judgments

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Affective Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurately judging emotion regulation (ER) may help facilitate and maintain social relationships. We investigated the accuracy and bias of ER judgments and their social correlates in a two-part study with 136 married couples (ages 23–85 years). Couples completed trait measures of their own and their partner’s suppression, reappraisal, and situation selection. On a separate day, they discussed a conflict, then rated their own and their partner’s suppression during the discussion. Couples accurately judged their partner’s trait level use of all ER strategies, but they were most accurate for suppression. In contrast, they did not accurately judge state suppression; they showed a similarity bias, such that their own use of state suppression predicted judgments of their partner’s suppression. Greater relationship satisfaction predicted positive biases at the trait level (e.g., overestimating reappraisal, underestimating suppression), but not the state level. Relationship length did not predict ER accuracy or bias. Findings suggest ER is more detectable at the trait level than state level and for strategies with more behavioral cues. Greater relationship satisfaction may signal positive perceptions of partners’ ER patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lameese Eldesouky.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Lameese Eldesouky was supported by the T32 AG00030-32 grant from the National Institute on Aging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data Availability

As per the Institutional Review Board’s regulations, the data cannot be made publicly available. Research materials and analysis code for the project can be obtained here: https://osf.io/kfsw2/.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

L.E., Y.G. K.B., and T.E. conceptualized the study. Y.G. and K.B. collected the data. L.E. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, and Y.G., K.B., and T.E. provided feedback on the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

The research reported in this manuscript was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board (Approval No. 201407009), and the study was performed to ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all research participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Shigehiro Oishi

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eldesouky, L., Guo, Y., Bentley, K. et al. Decoding the Regulator: Accuracy and Bias in Emotion Regulation Judgments. Affec Sci 3, 827–835 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00144-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00144-3

Keywords

Navigation