Skip to main content
Log in

Do Patterns and Types of Negative Affect During Hospitalization Predict Short-Term Post-Discharge Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors?

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Affective Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We still have little understanding of short-term predictors of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Prior research links increased negative affect to STBs, but the vast majority of earlier work is limited by measuring negative affect at one time point and aiming to predict STBs months or years in the future. Recently, intensive longitudinal studies have shown that negative affect is associated with suicidal thoughts over relatively short, clinically useful time periods; however, the specific patterns and types of negative affect that predict STBs remain unclear. Using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data from psychiatric inpatients hospitalized for suicide risk (n = 83), this study sought to test whether the patterns (means and variability) of two types of negative affect (anxiety/agitation and shame/self-hatred, which were derived from a larger EMA battery) during hospitalization predict STBs in the 4 weeks after discharge: an extremely high-risk time for suicidal behavior. The mean—but not the variability—of both anxiety/agitation and shame/self-hatred during hospitalization predicted the number of days with suicidal thoughts after discharge. The mean and the variability of shame/self-hatred—but not anxiety/agitation—predicted post-discharge suicide attempt. We discuss implications for assessment and treatment of suicidal individuals and propose key directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data from the first wave of this study have been reported in two publications (for which aims and analyses do not overlap with this report): Mou et al. (2018), which used 35 of 37 participants, and Kleiman et al., (2017; Study 2), which used 36 of 37 participants.

  2. In both study waves, the second question of the 4-week follow-up survey (“about how many days in the past four weeks did you think of killing yourself?”) had an error such that the maximum number of days participants could enter was 14 (not 28). Thus, we did not analyze the “how many days” question from the 4-week follow-up.

  3. We operationalized variability with SD instead of RMSSD or other more complex metrics for two reasons. (1) The convention is to require more data points (e.g., 20 in Dejonckheere et al., 2019) than we had here to calculate more complex, time-dependent affective metrics, whereas SD is not time-dependent (Trull et al., 2015). To reliably estimate the RMSSD, we would have needed to restrict to only those participants who completed higher numbers of EMA surveys which would have biased our sample and considerably reduced our N. (2) SD and RMSSD overlap and are highly correlated (e.g., Hisler et al., 2020; Wendt et al., 2019), and we were more interested in the relationship of NA variability with STBs rather than the unique effects of one index of variability when controlling for another.

  4. In two additional sensitivity analyses, (1) when excluding the 5 participants who did not complete the two-week follow-up but denied suicidal thoughts since discharge on the 4-week follow-up, the same findings also held. (2) When excluding participants who completed fewer than 10 EMA surveys, only mean levels of shame/self-hatred (not anxiety/agitation) predicted days with suicidal thoughts.

  5. When excluding the 5 participants coded as non-attempters based only on 2-week (not four-week) follow-up survey data, and when excluding participants who completed fewer than 10 EMA surveys, the same findings held.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate H. Bentley.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was funded by grant K23 MH120436 (KHB) from the National Institute of Mental Health, and the Chet and Will Griswold Suicide Prevention Fund (MKN).

Data Availability

The code and de-identified data used for the present study are available at https://osf.io/3h7m4/.

Code Availability

Code is available from the corresponding author on request.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Massachusetts General Hospital (IRB# 2015P000598) with reliance agreements established with other involved institutions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests. Dr Nock receives publication royalties from Macmillan, Pearson, and UpToDate. He has been a paid consultant in the past year for Microsoft Corporation, the Veterans Health Administration, Cerebral, and for a legal case regarding a death by suicide. He is an unpaid scientific advisor for Empatica, Koko, and TalkLife.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Preregistration

The analyses conducted here were not formally pre-registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00058-6.

Author Contribution

KHB: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing–original draft/review and editing, visualization, funding. DDL: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing–review and editing, visualization. EMK: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, project administration, writing–review and editing. ECK: conceptualization, writing–review and editing. PM: methodology, software, formal analysis, writing–review and editing. AJM: investigation, writing–review and editing. ARR: writing–original draft/review and editing. SBW: writing–review and editing. RGF: writing–review and editing. MBS: investigation, writing–review and editing. SB: investigation, writing–review and editing. JCH: investigation, project administration, writing–review and editing. MKN: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing–review and editing, project administration, funding.

Additional information

Handling editor: Wendy Berry Mendes

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bentley, K.H., Coppersmith, D.L., Kleiman, E.M. et al. Do Patterns and Types of Negative Affect During Hospitalization Predict Short-Term Post-Discharge Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors?. Affec Sci 2, 484–494 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00058-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00058-6

Keywords

Navigation