A multiphase mathematic model based on realizable k-ε turbulence model for subsonic flow was presented to investigate the mixing flow behaviors between gas and water in the gas-liquid ejector. The simulation was carried out to predict the pumping performance of the ejector by a commercial computational code ANSYS-FLUENT 15.0. General agreements between the predicted results and experimental data validated the present theoretical model. Using the present approach, the pressure, velocity, and turbulence intensity distribution along center-line and contours of gas and liquid volume fraction profiles were predicted. It is found that the mixing process between gas and water in ejector can be divided into three periods, co-axial flow, mixing shock flow, and bubble flow. The prediction results show that the mixing shock is a dominant position in affecting the mixing flow behavior in gas-liquid ejector and the ejector’s performances.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Cai, B. 2005. Analysis and experimental study on incipient cavitation within jet pumps. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University. Cramers, P., Beenackers, A. 2001. Influence of the ejector configuration, scale and the gas density on the mass transfer characteristics of gas-liquid ejectors. Chem Eng J, 82: 131–141.
Kim, M. I., Sin Kim, O., Lee, D. H., Done Kim, S. 2007. Numerical and experimental investigations of gas-liquid dispersion in an ejector. Chem Eng Sci, 62: 7133–7139.
Launder, B. E., Spalding, D. B. 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng, 3: 269–289.
Opletal, M., Novotny, P., Linek, V., Moucha, T., Kordac, M. 2018. Gas suction and mass transfer in gas-liquid up-flow ejector loop reactors. Effect of nozzle and ejector geometry. Chem Eng J, 353: 436–452.
Pianthong, K., Seehanam, W., Behnia, M., Sriveerakul, T., Aphornratana, S. 2007. Investigation and improvement of ejector refrigeration system using computational fluid dynamics technique. Energ Convers Manage, 48: 2556–2564.
Rahman, F., Umesh, D. B., Subbarao, D., Ramasamy, M. 2010. Enhancement of entrainment rates in liquid-gas ejectors. Chem Eng Process, 49: 1128–1135.
Senthil Kumar, R., Kumaraswamy, S., Mani, A. 2007. Experimental investigations on a two-phase jet pump used in desalination systems. Desalination, 204: 437–447.
Sharma, D., Patwardhan, A., Ranade, V. 2018. Effect of turbulent dispersion on hydrodynamic characteristics in a liquid jet ejector. Energy, 164: 10–20.
Shih, T. H., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J. 1995. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids, 24: 227–238.
Song, X., Park, J. H., Kim, S. G., Park, Y. C. 2013. Performance comparison and erosion prediction of jet pumps by using a numerical method. Math Comp Model, 57: 245–253.
Wu, J. 2017. Multi parameter analysis of gas-liquid jet pump pumping performance. Shenyang, China: Northeastern University.
Yadav, R. L., Patwardhan, A. W. 2008. Design aspects of ejectors: Effects of suction chamber geometry. Chem Eng Sci, 63: 3886–3897.
Zheng, P., Li, B., Qin, J. 2018. CFD simulation of two-phase ejector performance influenced by different operation conditions. Energy, 155: 1129–1145.
The financial supports provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51775098) and the Australian Research Council (DP160101953) are gratefully acknowledged.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Li, H., Dong, J. et al. Numerical study on mixing flow behavior in gas-liquid ejector. Exp. Comput. Multiph. Flow 3, 108–112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-020-0069-z