Abstract
Invasive alien species have had a ubiquitous and escalating negative impact on native species and ecosystems over the last decade. Few areas appear to be invulnerable to invasions, some of which occur over decades or centuries as those species spread gradually across the landscape. The current work does a bibliometric review of invasive insects’ research that has been done all around the world. With greater growing season temperatures and changed rainfall patterns, controlling native and exotic insects is getting more challenging as the climate changes, creating an increasing danger. Focus has been placed on invasive pest control and its effects in various nations. According to the data, China looks to be strong in terms of publication output in the field of invasive pests, but not in terms of citation counts. The number of studies has been growing rapidly over the last three years, which suggests that recent increases in the threat posed by various invasive species have had a significant impact on crops. The scientific community has therefore concentrated more on research effort over the past three years. To determine the implications of research findings in reducing the hazards posed by invasive pests, more thorough analysis is required in near future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available with the authors, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. The data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
Abramo G, Angelo DCA, Costa DF (2008) Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? High Educ 57(2):155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
Barth M, Haustein S, Scheidt B (2013) The life sciences in German-Chinese cooperation: an institutional-level co-publication analysis. Scientometrics 98(1):99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1147-9
Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring Trade-offs in the Organization of Scientific Work: Collaboration and Scientific Reward. Manage Sci 61(7):1473–1495. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2052
Cariton J, Geller JB (1993) Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms. Science 261(5117):78–82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5117.78
Ceballos HG, Fangmeyer J, Galeano N, Juarez E, Cantu-Ortiz FJ (2017) Impelling research productivity and impact through collaboration: a scientometric case study of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 15(3):346–355. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0064-8
Davidson L (2005) Recovery, self-management and the expert patient perspective. J Ment Health 1:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230500047968
Ellegaard O, Wallin JA (2015) The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 105:1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Ferligoj A, Kronegger L, Mali F, Snijders TAB, Doreian P (2015) Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system. Scientometrics 104(3):985–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7
Frandsen TF, Rousseau R (2004) Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 56(1):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20100
Herzog C, Hook D, Konkiel S (2020) Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quant Sci Stud 1(1):387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
Huai C, Chai L (2016) A bibliometric analysis on the performance and underlying dynamic patterns of water security research. Scientometrics 108(3):1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2019-x
King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430(6997):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a
Kumar SR, Kaliyaperumal K (2015) A scientometric analysis of mobile technology publications. Scientometrics 105(2):921–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1710-7
Lampert A, Liebhold AM (2020) Combining multiple tactics over time for cost-effective eradication of invading insect populations. Ecol Lett 24(2):279–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13640
Lee S, Bozeman B (2005) The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren, JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269(1508):2407–2413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2179
Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8(4):133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90025-k
Moshobane MC, Esser LF (2022) Ensemble modeling for the potential distribution of invasive weed Verbesina encelioides in South Africa from 2020 to 2090. Manag Biol Invasions 13(4):833–844. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.16
Poland TM, Patel WT, Finch DM, Miniat CF, Hayes DC, Lopez VM (2021) Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States: A Comprehensive Science Synthesis for the United States Forest Sector (1st ed. 2021 ed.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1
Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC, Genovesi P, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Liebhold AM, Mandrak NE, Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Pergl J, Roy HE, Seebens H, Richardson DM (2020) Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol Rev 95(6):1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78: 375–388. https://www.preslia.cz/P064CRic.pdf
Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435
Seebens H, Clarke DA, Groom Q, Wilson JRU, García-Berthou E, Kühn I, Roigé M, Pagad S, Essl F, Vicente J, Winter M, McGeoch M (2020) A workflow for standardising and integrating alien species distribution data. NeoBiota 59:39–59. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.59.53578
Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Ramezani A, Atlasi R, Larijani B, Abdollahi M (2016) Scientometric study of academic publications on antioxidative herbal medicines in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord 15:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40200-016-0273-3. PMID: 27785446; PMCID: PMC5073927
Van ECKNJ, Waltman L (2009) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Venette R, Morey A (2019) Advances in understanding the ecology of invasive crop insect pests and their impact on IPM.Integrat Manag Insect Pests Curr Future Develop 161-190.https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/59268
Venette RC, Hutchison WD (2021) Invasive Insect Species: Global Challenges, Strategies & Opportunities. Front. Insect Sci 1:650520. https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2021.650520
Visser M, van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2020) Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10732
Vitousek PM, D’antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Scientist 84:468–478. https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/61
Waltman L, Calero-Medina C, Kosten J, Noyons EC, Tijssen RJ, Van Eck NJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Van Raan AF, Visser MS, Wouters P (2012) The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 63(12):2419–2432. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708
Weingart P (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics 62(1):117–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7
Williamson MH, Brown KC (1986) The analysis and modelling of British invasions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 314:505–22
Wittenberg P, Cock MJW (Eds) (2001) Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International, 228. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/book/10.1079/9780851995694.0000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors were the sole contributors to this manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghosh, P., Lal, P. Trends in invasive insect pest research: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Trop Insect Sci 43, 1369–1380 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-023-01022-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-023-01022-6