Does Care Count for Less? Tracing the Income Trajectories of Low Status Female Immigrant Workers in Canada, 1993–2015

Abstract

Canada has long relied on women from poorer countries to fill gaps in its paid care market. Yet little is known about the upward or downward trajectories of immigrant women who arrive intending to work in lower status jobs in care. Using a unique administrative dataset (the Longitudinal Immigration Database), the author estimates a series of growth curve models of employment income for 220,265 non-professional, non-managerial immigrant women working in Canada between 1993 and 2015. Results reinforce prior suggestions of a “care [wage] penalty”, as all intended care workers, besides nurse aides, fare worse over two decades in the labour market than comparable intended non-care workers. Yet entry class is also found to play a role. Women who arrive to Canada though the Live-in Caregiver Program--which has the explicit goal of providing in-home care for children, the elderly, and people with disabilities--have higher employment income than comparable immigrant women reporting the intention to work in homecare who entered via the family reunification and economic immigration streams.

RÉSUMÉ

Le Canada compte depuis longtemps sur les femmes des pays plus pauvres pour combler les lacunes de son marché des soins rémunérés. Pourtant, nos connaissances sont limitées sur les trajectoires ascendantes ou descendantes des immigrantes qui arrivent avec l'intention d'occuper des emplois de statut inférieur dans le secteur des soins. À l'aide d'une base de données administratives uniques (la base de données longitudinale sur l'immigration), l'auteur estime une série de modèles de courbe de croissance du revenu d'emploi pour 220 265 immigrantes non professionnelles et non gestionnaires travaillant au Canada entre 1993 et 2015. Les résultats renforcent les suggestions antérieures d'un « pénalité de soins », car tous les soignants visés, outre les aides-soignantes, réussissent moins bien sur le marché du travail sur deux décennies que les travailleurs non soignants visés comparables. Pourtant, la classe d'entrée joue également un rôle. Les femmes qui arrivent au Canada par le biais du Programme des aides familiaux résidants -- dont l'intention explicite est de fournir des soins à domicile aux enfants, aux personnes âgées et aux personnes handicapées -- ont un revenu d'emploi plusélevé que les femmes immigrantes comparables déclarant l'intention de travailler dans les soins à domicile qui sont entrés via les volets du regroupement familial et de l'immigration économique.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    The LCP was reformed in 2014, in part due to critiques from caregivers and their advocates that the live-in component created scenarios of employer exploitation and abuse (Banerjee et al., 2018; Tungohan et al., 2015).

  2. 2.

    By comparison, the top five intended non-caring occupations for the sample of non-professional, non-managerial immigrant women at landing between 1993 and 2015 were administrative assistants (17%); administrative officers (4.2%), accounting technicians and bookkeepers (3.5%), tailors, dressmakers, furriers, and milliners (3.4%) and general office support workers (3.3%).

  3. 3.

    Within the total non-professional, non-managerial sample, only 3% of immigrants reporting these intended occupations between 1993 and 2015 were male. Consequently, the empirical analysis in this study focuses on the female population only.

  4. 4.

    The IMDB does not include undocumented or illegalized immigrants, as they do not file taxes. These individuals likely comprise a significant proportion of the immigrant population in Canada’s larger cities (see Sidhu, 2013).

  5. 5.

    The analysis for this paper begins in 1993, 1 year after the introduction of the LCP, in order to allow all immigrants in the sample sufficient time in the labour market for accurate measurement of annual employment income in the tax file data.

  6. 6.

    MLM is appropriate for the IMDB, in part, because it incorporates all individuals in its estimation of trajectories, regardless of the number of waves in which the respondent participated, thereby addressing concerns about data attrition and periods outside the labour market (Fairbrother, 2014).

  7. 7.

    Note that the intended occupation field is mandatory for principal applicant immigrants within the economic entry categories, in part explaining its high prevalence within the study population.

References

  1. Adserà, A., & Ferrer, A. (2016). Occupational skills and labour market progression of married immigrant women in Canada. Labour Economics, 39, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alboim, N., & Cohl, K. (2012). Shaping the Future: Canada's Rapidly Changing Immigration Policies: Maytree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, N., & Hughes, K. D. (2010). The business of caring: Women's self-employment and the marketization of care. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(4), 381–405.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (2009). Precarious employment in the health-care sector. In L. F. Vosko, M. MacDonald, & I. Campbell (Eds.), Gender and the contours of precarious employment (pp. 256–270). Routledge Press.

  5. Atanackovic, J., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2013). The employment and recruitment of immigrant care workers in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atanackovic, J., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2014). Economic and social integration of immigrant live-in caregivers in Canada. Retrieved from

  7. Banerjee, R. (2009). Income growth of new immigrants in Canada: Evidence from the survey of labour and income dynamics. Industrial Relations, 64(3), 466–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee, R., Kelly, P., Tungohan, E., Cleto, P., de Leon, C., Garcia, M., et al. (2018). From “migrant” to “citizen”: Labor market integration of former live-in caregivers in Canada. International Labour Review, 71(4), 908–936.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barron, D. N., & West, E. (2013). The financial costs of caring in the British labour market: Is there a wage penalty for workers in caring occupations? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(1), 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bierman, A. (2014). Reconsidering the relationship between age and financial strain among older adults. Society and Mental Health, 4(3), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Birdsell Bauer, L., & Cranford, C. (2017). The community dimensions of union renewal: Racialized and caring relations in personal support services. Work, Employment and Society, 31(2), 302–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourgeault, I. L., & Khokher, P. (2006). Making a better living from caregiving: Comparing strategies to improve wages for care providers. Canadian Review of Sociology, 43(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brickner, R. K., & Straehle, C. (2010). The missing link: Gender, immigration policy and the live-in caregiver program in Canada. Policy and Society, 29(4), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Budig, M. J., & Misra, J. (2010). How care-work employment shapes earnings in cross-national perspective. Interational Labour Review, 149(4), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Budig, M. J., Hodges, M. J., & England, P. (2019). Wages of Nurturant and reproductive care workers: Individual and job characteristics, occupational closure, and wage-equalizing institutions. Social Problems, (66), 294–319.

  16. Christofides, L. N., Polycarpou, A., & Vrachimis, K. (2013). Gender wage gaps, ‘sticky floors’ and ‘glass ceilings’ in Europe. Labour Economics, 21, 86–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coloma, R. S., McElhinny, B. S., Davidson, L. M., Catungal, J. P., & Tungohan, E. (2012). Filipinos in Canada: disturbing invisibility. University of Toronto Press.

  18. Dodson, L., & Zincavage, R. M. (2007). “It's like a family” caring labor, exploitation, and race in nursing homes. Gender & Society, 21(6), 905–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duffy, M. (2011). Making care count: A century of gender, race, and paid care work. Rutgers University Press.

  20. Duffy, M., & Armenia, A. (2019). Paid care work around the globe: A comparative analysis of 47 countries prepared for UN women. Retrieved from

  21. Elrick, J., & Lightman, N. (2016). Sorting or shaping? The gendered economic outcomes of immigration policy in Canada. International Migration Review, 50(2), 352–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49(4), 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Evra, R., & Prokopenko, E. (2018). Longitudinal immigration database (IMDB) technical report, 2015. Retrieved from Statistics Canada, 11–633-X: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-633-x/11-633-x2018011-eng.htm

  25. Fairbrother, M. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(01), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Faraday, F. (2012). Made in Canada. How the Law Constructs Migrant Workers’ Insecurity. Toronto, Metcalf Foundation.

  27. Ferrer, A. M., Picot, G., & Riddell, W. C. (2014). New directions in immigration policy: Canada's evolving approach to the selection of economic immigrants. International Migration Review, 48(3), 846–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. FitzGerald, D. S., & Arar, R. (2018). The sociology of refugee migration. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Folbre, N. (Ed.). (2012). For love or money: Care provision in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.

  30. Forbes, D. A., & Neufeld, A. (2008). Discourse: Looming dementia care crisis: Canada needs an integrated model of continuing care now!

  31. Foster, J. (2018). Unfree labour? Struggles of migrant and immigrant Workers in Canada eds. By Aziz Choudry and Adrian a. smith. Labour/Le Travail, 81, 269–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuller, S. (2015). Do pathways matter? Linking early immigrant employment sequences and later economic outcomes: Evidence from Canada. International Migration Review, 49(2), 355–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2012). The impact of precarious legal status on Immigrants' economic outcomes. IRPP Study, 35, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hanley, J., Larios, L., & Koo, J.-H. (2017). Does Canada" care" about migrant caregivers?: Implications under the reformed caregiver program. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 49(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hennebry, J. L., & Preibisch, K. (2012). A model for managed migration? Re-examining best practices in Canada’s seasonal agricultural worker program. International Migration, 50(s1), e19–e40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hodge, J. (2006). Unskilled labour: Canada's live-in caregiver program. Undercurrent, 3(2), 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hurst, E., Li, G., & Pugsley, B. (2014). Are household surveys like tax forms? Evidence from income underreporting of the self-employed. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada. (2018). Annual report to parliament on immigration. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/annual-report-2018.pdf

  39. Javdani, M., & Pendakur, K. (2014). Fiscal effects of immigrants in Canada. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 15(4), 777–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Keung, N. (2019). ‘Canada is caring for our caregivers:’ New programs give foreign caregivers job mobility, chance to bring family. In Toronto Star Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2019/06/15/new-programs-give-foreign-caregivers-job-mobility-chance-to-bring-family.html.

    Google Scholar 

  41. León, M. (2016). The transformation of care in European societies. Springer.

  42. Lightman, N. (2019). The migrant in the market: Care penalties and immigration in eight Liberal welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meyer, B. D., & Mittag, N. (2015). Using linked survey and administrative data to better measure income: Implications for poverty, program effectiveness and holes in the safety net. Retrieved from

  44. Michel, S., & Peng, I. (2012). All in the family? Migrants, nationhood, and care regimes in Asia and North America. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moyce, S., Lash, R., & de Leon Siantz, M. L. (2016). Migration experiences of foreign educated nurses: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(2), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pendakur, K., & Pendakur, R. (2015). The Colour of Money Redux: Immigrant/Ethnic Earnings Disparity in Canada 1991–2006. Retrieved from

  47. Ranci, C., Cordini, M., Cerea, S., & Arlotti, M. (2019). Migrant and/or care workers? Debating the Ethnicization of the elderly care market in Italy and the United Kingdom. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxz002.

  48. Robson, J. (2019). John Robson: The health-care crisis in Canada is that nothing ever changes. In National Post Retrieved from https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-robson-the-health-care-crisis-in-canada-is-that-nothing-ever-changes.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rutter, J. (2006). Changing migration patterns in the UK: Implications for education. In A. Ross (Ed.), Citizenship education: Europe and the world (pp. 351–360). CiCe.

  50. Salami, B., & Nelson, S. (2014). The downward occupational mobility of internationally educated nurses to domestic workers. Nursing Inquiry, 21(2), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schwiter, K., Strauss, K., & England, K. (2018). At home with the boss: Migrant live-in caregivers, social reproduction and constrained agency in the UK, Canada, Austria and Switzerland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(3), 462–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sidhu, N. (2013). Accessing community programs and services for non-status immigrants in Toronto: Organizational challenges and responses retrieved from Toronto:

    Google Scholar 

  53. Statistics Canada. (2017). Longitudinal Immigration Database (IMDB). Retrieved from http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p2SV.pl?Function=getSurvey&SDDS=5057

  54. Tungohan, E. (2018). Living with compromised legal status: Irregular temporary foreign Workers in Alberta and the importance of imagining, strategizing, and inter-provincial legal consciousness. International Migration, 56(6), 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tungohan, E., Banerjee, R., Chu, W., Cleto, P., de Leon, C., Garcia, M., Kelly, P., Luciano, M., Palmaria, C., & Sorio, C. (2015). After the live-in caregiver program: Filipina Caregivers' experiences of graduated and uneven citizenship. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 47(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Van Hooren, F., Apitzsch, B., & Ledoux, C. (2018). The politics of care work and migration. In A. Weinar, S. Bonjour, & L. Zhyznomirska (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the politics of migration in Europe. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (File no: 430-2018-00062).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Lightman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 4 Growth curve model measuring annual employment income trajectory for migrant women intending to work in care (dichotomous measure), 1993–2015

Appendix 2

Table 5 Growth curve model measuring annual employment income trajectory for migrant women intending to work in care (categorical measure), 1993–2015

Appendix 3

Table 6 Growth curve models measuring annual employment income trajectories for LCP migrant women reporting four types of intended care work, 1993–2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lightman, N. Does Care Count for Less? Tracing the Income Trajectories of Low Status Female Immigrant Workers in Canada, 1993–2015. Can. Stud. Popul. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42650-021-00040-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Labor migration
  • Gender and migration
  • Longitudinal analysis in demographic research

MOTS-CLÉ

  • Migration et travail
  • Migration et genre
  • Analyse longitudinale dans la recherche démographique